View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tachi
Joined: 09 May 2020 Posts: 98 Location: China guangzhou
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:21 am Post subject: Any information about Telor 85 mm f/2.0 |
|
|
tachi wrote:
I can't find any news about it here. Can you help me.
It's best to have a structural diagram of this lens。
#1
#2
_________________ a person has no faith if he has no patience |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3953 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
A quick search on google reveals that the lens was made by MOM in Hungary; it seems to be related to the Sowjet Jupiter 9 which in turn is based on the German Zeiss Sonnar 2/85mm.
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Max78
Joined: 14 Oct 2011 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Max78 wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
A quick search on google reveals that the lens was made by MOM in Hungary; it seems to be related to the Sowjet Jupiter 9 which in turn is based on the German Zeiss Sonnar 2/85mm.
S |
My search says, that it is Planar-like design - 6 lenses in 4 groups: https://lens-club.ru/lenses/item/c_5442.html
Google Translation: The Telor 1:2/85 technical lens was installed on test benches for ship turbines and high-speed rudder propeller units. It usually exists in the form of lens blocks without a focusing unit. Due to the fact that the lens worked in difficult conditions, the front lens was usually subject to erosion. With the first lens affected by erosion, the lens turns into a soft lens, because this erosion is uniform in the form of a light shagreen. A lens in good technical condition is rare. In terms of shooting qualities, it is a typical planar with a typical pattern on an open aperture. Color reproduction without distortion. The lens is very easy to adapt to a 35mm camera. The lens block is simply inserted into the helicoid of the Helios-44M lens and you get a lens with 70-80mm MDF. The lens is very overpriced. In essence, this is an ordinary planar, of which there are many. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
https://spiral-m42.blogspot.com/2021/08/mommagyar-optikai-muvek-telor-85mm-f2.html
Spiral checked the lens should be a 6e/4g Gauss type. It is not difficult to check by looking at the reflections at the rear with the aperture closed.
Without checking the lens, I would guess the lens is a double gauss than a sonnar: the size of rear element looks close to the size of front element. For a sonnar type 85/2.0 lens, the rear element will be much smaller compare to the front element. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3953 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
https://spiral-m42.blogspot.com/2021/08/mommagyar-optikai-muvek-telor-85mm-f2.html
Spiral checked the lens should be a 6e/4g Gauss type. It is not difficult to check by looking at the reflections at the rear with the aperture closed.
Without checking the lens, I would guess the lens is a double gauss than a sonnar: the size of rear element looks close to the size of front element. For a sonnar type 85/2.0 lens, the rear element will be much smaller compare to the front element. |
Thank you for correcting me - it's easy to believe some web sources, but checking a lens yourself is safer
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Yes. The best is to check it by opening the lens. I think Spiral is very capable to identify a lens structure as he is well known in the manual lens community.
Since we have the sample photos, I can double check my previous assumption without the help from Spiral. The photos with tress shows the swirly bokeh which is much more common on double gauss than sonnar. So, the lens Spiral owns should be a double gauss.
To investigate further, let us check the link on twitter showing a different design of the Telor 85/2? This may be an early version/prototype? I can't verify this so I will leave it to someone more capable.
https://twitter.com/tefolium/status/1377481463814254592
There is also a design of MOM Telor 180/2.8 for 18mm x 24mm ?!
https://twitter.com/tefolium/status/1377865695548084225 _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tachi
Joined: 09 May 2020 Posts: 98 Location: China guangzhou
|
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
tachi wrote:
Thank you very much to my friends:Stevemark, Max78, and calvin83。 Thank you for your information _________________ a person has no faith if he has no patience |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hudson
Joined: 08 Jan 2024 Posts: 18 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hudson wrote:
I've recently purchased a MOM 100mm f2 with a Hasselblad mount (haven't received it yet). I'm quite excited about it.
Does anyone know if any of the versions of this lens cover 6x6 and can be easily adapted to a suitable mount? They're all adapted to M39/M42 from the original industrial purpose? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|