| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 577
Location: Zurich
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 2:47 pm Post subject: James Bond's Takumars |
 |
|
wolan wrote:
Just seen in a James Bond movie (You live only twice min 43):
On the left the 50mm f1.4, on the right I am not sure 35mm f3.5?
Cheers.
_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/149089857@N03/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 878
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
I do disagree. These are not owned by Bond but by Q.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrianSVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Posts: 343
Location: Philadelphia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:26 pm Post subject: Re: James Bond's Takumars |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
It's the exceptionally rare Quartz Takumar, 85mm f/3.5, a lens designed for UV scientific imaging. These days, they can fetch up to 5 figures!
| wolan wrote: |
Just seen in a James Bond movie (You live only twice min 43):
On the left the 50mm f1.4, on the right I am not sure 35mm f3.5?
Cheers. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wolan
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 577
Location: Zurich
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolan wrote:
_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/149089857@N03/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2532
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
One wonders what the use of these lenses was, FOV is much too narrow to catch the face of the driver or a passenger, especially the 85mm. :p
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 1180
Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
| D1N0 wrote: |
| One wonders what the use of these lenses was, FOV is much too narrow to catch the face of the driver or a passenger, especially the 85mm. :p |
Knowing "Q" (The Desmond Llewyn one, not that youngster replacement), those lenses probably articulate and move in and out more than a reasonable amount. 
...And yes, I'm a fan 
-D.S.
_________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrianSVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2023
Posts: 343
Location: Philadelphia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2024 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
Who knows, but it's doubtlessly the first instance of an Asahi/Pentax lens mounted on a Sony body...
| Doc Sharptail wrote: |
| D1N0 wrote: |
| One wonders what the use of these lenses was, FOV is much too narrow to catch the face of the driver or a passenger, especially the 85mm. :p |
Knowing "Q" (The Desmond Llewyn one, not that youngster replacement), those lenses probably articulate and move in and out more than a reasonable amount.
...And yes, I'm a fan
-D.S. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
