UV Topcor 53mm/F2 on APS-C

[tb_a]

Hi everybody,

I think it's no surprise that I took another one of my UV Topcors this morning for my dog walk, namely the standard lens (UV Topcor 53/2) which was attached to the Topcon Uni camera when it was available in the 1960's. Somehow a strange focus length which is also used by the Russians for their Industar lens.

More information about the UV Topcor lenses can be found in the previous threads about the other lenses here:
100mm: http://goo.gl/N1QjDF
35mm: http://goo.gl/z1TFWJ
28mm: http://goo.gl/AJAFzl

Pictures of the lenses: http://goo.gl/12hTV0

As before all pictures shot with my beloved Ricoh GXR-M (APS-C/12MP/without anti-aliasing AKA low-pass filter) and just downsized for presentation. No PP besides some exposure corrections (when needed). The used aperture should be obvious. Mainly fully open, except for the infinity shots.

As usual pictures taken primarily to show the capabilities and/or shortcomings of the lens and not the skills of the photographer and therefore on purpose some repeating scenarios have been chosen for better comparability.

The pictures (clickable for larger view):














All pictures taken without any accessories except a universal rubber lens hood. No flash or distance rings have been used. All shot free hand.

For the pixel peepers some 100% crops all taken fully open (F2):





Finally I didn't realize any noteworthy shortcomings. I think it's by far my best lens in relation to the money I've paid for.
Not even CA's which are somehow disturbing the picture are noticeable on the test shot with the lamp. That's rather remarkable.
However, in terms of bokeh it's certainly not my favorite lens but this is rather a matter of taste.

I do hope I was able to be of help at least for some of the readers here.
However, nobody is forced to read my boring and "overbearing" contributions. That's certainly the good news.
Sorry for my bad English. My German is far better.

Cheers,

[mo]

I don't read your words I just look at the pictures Seriously, very nice pictures, and the lens it seems is in the right hands.

[tb_a]

[kryss]

I like the Hibiscus Thomas...

[scsambrook]

Hi Thomas - never mind the nice pictures, I'm looking at the words so I can point out errors ( ) . . . Now I can show off my superior encyclopaedic knowledge of stuff that has little or no real world impact. (yes, yes, I know I can't take decent pictures but what the heck! )

The lens is labelled 53mm because most 50mm lenses are actually TWO INCHES in focal length, which is pretty much 53mm. At least, that's what I've read in lots of books. And I think the origin of that is to do with 19th century connections between photography and microscopy and the use of imperial measurements even by continental makers.

Coming back to the real world, I think those UV Topcors are very nice. Looks like you've got the full set !

[tb_a]

@kryss - Thank you!

@Stephen,

Thank you as well! So now I've learned (again) something from you!
Obviously there are still some book readers around, at least we are two of them.

Well, what I've found out so far, I have indeed the full set from the Uni series of cameras. The later Unirex, which was the last Topcon leaf shutter camera (with dual metering mode, integral and spot), brought also the 28mm/F4 lens (which I have too) and the 50mm/F2 lens which I don't have. The outer design of these newer lenses was also different (complete silver or black). That's also apparent on the picture of my collection.

Kind regards,

[papasito]

[iangreenhalgh1]

I have to say that, compared to it's big brother, the RE Topcor 1.8/58, this one doesn't look good. There's a big difference in the contrast, particularly micro contrast. This one looks sharp enough, albeit less sharp then the RE, but the images are totally different in rendition, much flatter, almost as if the glass is not clean. In such bright sunlight, the RE produces images with real bite and that '3D pop' people talk about is often visible. This UV very much looks like a budget item in comparison, which is what it was.

I have the 35, 50, 100 and 135 UV Topcors and also the mount from a broken Uni but never got round to making a working adapter. They are very well made lenses, they feel like really high quality items.

[papasito]

They were made for social photographer.

The topcon cameras for the UV lenses had compete with Zeiss Ikon contaflexes. Voigtlander bessamatic and ultramatic. Kowa with fixed lens, etc.

The IQ necessary was not so great. Only for límites médium to little copies.

[tb_a]

[tb_a]

[iangreenhalgh1]

[tb_a]

UV Topcor to Sony-E: Click here to see on Ebay
UV Topcor to Fuji FX: Click here to see on Ebay

[papasito]

[mo]

Thanks for the adapter links Thomas

[tb_a]

[iangreenhalgh1]

He has a total of 3 NEX adapters available and the price is 10 times what a Chinese M42-NEX adapter costs.

Not an attractive proposition for me.

[mo]

I know we are getting OT, and forgive my ignorance but Topcor lenses are not M42 are they? These adapters are certainly not cheap (if there are other options that would be nice to know), but from my understanding they are not readily available,its still a niche market? I have wondered about these lenses for awhile so its nice to know there are adapters if I decide to follow my curiousity and buy one.: D

Posts like these help make that decision easier,not only by showing the lens and samples but showing the available adapters.

[pimpy1]

Does anyone know if this lens Topcon UV Topcor 53mm f/2 has thorium in the elements or is radioactive in anyway? Thanks.

[ARD]

[pimpy1]

[Ernst Dinkla]

[John Shriver]

The only thoriated (radioactive) Topcor is the RE GN Topcor 50/1.4. Tickles my Geiger counter, and I had to bleach it out with UV light -- it had gone tea brown.

The UV Topcor lenses rear elements had to fit into the small leaf shutter on the cameras. A constraint that hampered quality at a given cost. Also the reason so many of the lenses were f/4.