View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2023 10:53 pm Post subject: Leitz Focotar 4.5/50 (Schneider made) as a cityscape shooter |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
To my surprise, there is no samples in the forum taken with the 1st version of the enlarger Focotar 4.5/50. I took the lens for a walk and used it occasionally WO handheld on Sony NEX. It is a later version, with a large front glass. It works rather fine as a cityscape lens, in twilight too.
#1
#2
#3
#4 SOOC jpg
Last edited by alex ph on Tue Sep 12, 2023 5:16 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2023 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Some more shots taken with the same setup in slightly brighter light, but not yet in the midday.
I suppose the lens has a special light transmission parameters. The resulting Nex jpg has a high plasticity and might be pushed quite far in exposure. Meantime quite often the colours in slightly pushed shots tend to magenta and thus need a bit more of correction. Beside this, the shapes are neat. And in some lighting conditions even SOOC jpg comes out perfectly balanced, while in some others (especially contrasty light) colour shift is more visible.
The followng shots were slightly corrected in exposure and colour.
#1
#2
#3
A simple BW conversion with exposure and contrast further pushed gives especially neat and crisp results, including portraits or portrait-like shots. The last shot is taken in twilight and glow neon lighting, then exposure and contrast are pushed quite heavily.
#4
#5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 634
|
Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2023 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
#4
|
Great shots, particularly the second set! I like this B&W image best. Seems to work really well for that. Was it stopped down?
BTW. there's a number of different Focotar 50/4.5 lenses, even besides the Schneider-made one:
https://deltalenses.com/?s=focotar+50
I've only tried mine for macro/close-ups. Unsurprisingly it's quite good there as well, although I doubt it comes close to the Focotar-2, particularly in the corners...
Compensate for feeling incomplete by simple.joy, on Flickr
Territories by simple.joy, on Flickr _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you very much! Following Deltalenses typology, I have a Schneider made lens. Good to know. I used it wide open in the previous shots. But even the max aperture is set, the blades remain very slightly closed. I don't know if it is a feature by design (as it happens in some other enlarger lenses) or a fault of my copy which had a pretty hard working life, given its aspect.
This yours is especially crunchy! Very appealing.
I finally used mine in a strong sunlight, including mid and short but not macro distance. The results are shiny.
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3189 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Nice results of this lens! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
And here is a couple of night shots, properly speaking. WO on Sony Nex. They keep the pleasing combination of neatness and mildness showed in daytime shots, even at distance.
#1
#2 Sooc jpeg
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 634
|
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2023 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
Thank you very much! Following Deltalenses typology, I have a Schneider made lens. Good to know. I used it wide open in the previous shots. But even the max aperture is set, the blades remain very slightly closed. I don't know if it is a feature by design (as it happens in some other enlarger lenses) or a fault of my copy which had a pretty hard working life, given its aspect.
This yours is especially crunchy! Very appealing.
|
Thanks a lot! Yes, you're right - the blades in the Schneider-made Focotar don't open fully and I'm sure it's by design. A number of earlier Leitz enlarging lenses had a max. aperture of f/3.5, so it's likely that they limited that to f/4.5 in order to provide excellent results wide open. Limited aperture ranges are actually not uncommon in other high-grade industrial lenses, so it's usually not a bad sign.
The important thing to consider when adapting lenses like that is the blades showing up, particularly in direct light. That doesn't seem to be a problem with the Focotar 50mm f/4.5 LFE from my observation. Just tried it with a metal object in direct sunlight:
Brassentation of the key change by simple.joy, on Flickr
I would still prefer to be able to use it to f/3.5 or thereabouts, like the older Elmar/Varob designs.
alex ph wrote: |
I finally used mine in a strong sunlight, including mid and short but not macro distance. The results are shiny.
#1
#2
|
Yup - looks great! 👠_________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2023 5:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
simple.joy wrote: |
Yes, you're right - the blades in the Schneider-made Focotar don't open fully and I'm sure it's by design. ...
I would still prefer to be able to use it to f/3.5 or thereabouts, like the older Elmar/Varob designs. |
Thank you for the confirmation. Me too, I'd like to use this Xeno-Focotar WO, with (I presume) slight glow around edges, an interesting effect for portrait employement.
You continue to cherish the gaze with joyfully bright and masterfully made shots. Bravo!
The lens resists pretty well to flare, including neon and halogen night lights.
#1
Even though in some positions towards direct sunlight you get visible strikes of stray beams affecting the IQ.
#2
When the light is calm and the distance is close, it is a hit without miss.
#3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Finally an "odd" comparison confronting the Focotar to a Yashinon-DX 1.7/50. The Yashinon shots are taken some years ago.
#1 Focotar WO (f4.5) close focusing
#2 Yashinon close focusing (a similar statue)
#3 Focotar WO
#4 Yashinon at f4 or f5.6
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SandroB
Joined: 07 Mar 2013 Posts: 45 Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2023 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SandroB wrote:
Interesting pictures! I didn't know the Focotar was produced by Schneider. Was it a Schneider design? I have a 4.5/50mm Focotar that I occsionally use for macro photos.
So were they all produced by Schneider?
Lex _________________ Lenses:
Leitz/Leica Elmarit-M 2; Elmarit-M 28; Summaron 2.8/35; Summicron 35; Summilux 35; Summarit 1.5/50; Elmar 50; Elmar-M 50; Summicron 50; Summilux 50; Elmar 65; Elmar 90; Elmarit 90; Tele-Elmar 135; Elmarit 135; Telyt 4/200.
Steinheil Culminar 2.8/90
Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135
Bodies: Leica M3, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6TTL, MDa, MD-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2023 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
SandroB wrote: |
Interesting pictures! I didn't know the Focotar was produced by Schneider. ... So were they all produced by Schneider? |
I knew that one of Focotars is made by Schneider from the text on deltalenses, related by simple.joy. Visibly, only one model is known to be in the case, the one with larger front element.
Here is another couple of shots from everyday life of a large city.
#1
#2
#3
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 634
|
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2023 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
SandroB wrote: |
Interesting pictures! I didn't know the Focotar was produced by Schneider. Was it a Schneider design? I have a 4.5/50mm Focotar that I occsionally use for macro photos.
So were they all produced by Schneider?
Lex |
No, as far as I know only the one with the obvious large front element (17581A), as alex ph has mentioned. You can read up on that in the article in progress Mark (initiator of the deltalenses project and active here as user "16:9") has created:
https://deltalenses.com/the-leica-story/#:~:text=received%20%E2%80%98Focotar%E2%80%99%20branding.-,The,-Focotar%20Dynasty%3A%2050mm
He has done a lot more research on the matter. There are lots of 50 mm Focotars actually as you can see in the table I linked to, and then there are of course also the 60 mm, 95 mm and 100 mm versions. Most of them are pretty good actually. I've recently been quite impressed by their predecessors the Voort 9.5 cm and Varob 5 cm lenses. You can find some of my sample shots with many of these lenses in the article, if you're interested.
BTW. The Focotar (17581A) is not the only case where Leitz labeled lenses were actually made by Schneider, that's for sure. 😉 _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SandroB
Joined: 07 Mar 2013 Posts: 45 Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SandroB wrote:
Very interesting information and thanks for the link. I have a stupid question: I have Focotar and years ago I wrote down a serial number,. but I can't find it back on the lens. Any suggestion where to find it?
Lex _________________ Lenses:
Leitz/Leica Elmarit-M 2; Elmarit-M 28; Summaron 2.8/35; Summicron 35; Summilux 35; Summarit 1.5/50; Elmar 50; Elmar-M 50; Summicron 50; Summilux 50; Elmar 65; Elmar 90; Elmarit 90; Tele-Elmar 135; Elmarit 135; Telyt 4/200.
Steinheil Culminar 2.8/90
Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135
Bodies: Leica M3, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6TTL, MDa, MD-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SandroB
Joined: 07 Mar 2013 Posts: 45 Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
SandroB wrote:
Never mind about the serial number, with a magnifying glass I found it again.
Lex _________________ Lenses:
Leitz/Leica Elmarit-M 2; Elmarit-M 28; Summaron 2.8/35; Summicron 35; Summilux 35; Summarit 1.5/50; Elmar 50; Elmar-M 50; Summicron 50; Summilux 50; Elmar 65; Elmar 90; Elmarit 90; Tele-Elmar 135; Elmarit 135; Telyt 4/200.
Steinheil Culminar 2.8/90
Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135
Bodies: Leica M3, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6TTL, MDa, MD-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2023 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Did it give you some meaningful information? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SandroB
Joined: 07 Mar 2013 Posts: 45 Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SandroB wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
Did it give you some meaningful information? |
If you mean the number, yes, and that points to 1965 as year of production.
Lex _________________ Lenses:
Leitz/Leica Elmarit-M 2; Elmarit-M 28; Summaron 2.8/35; Summicron 35; Summilux 35; Summarit 1.5/50; Elmar 50; Elmar-M 50; Summicron 50; Summilux 50; Elmar 65; Elmar 90; Elmarit 90; Tele-Elmar 135; Elmarit 135; Telyt 4/200.
Steinheil Culminar 2.8/90
Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135
Bodies: Leica M3, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6TTL, MDa, MD-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Do you have an idea of the changing lens IQ according the year of production? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
16:9
Joined: 04 Apr 2014 Posts: 311 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2023 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
16:9 wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
Do you have an idea of the changing lens IQ according the year of production? |
With regard to the Focotar 50mm, there are four optical designs packaged in eight versions during the decades-long production run. Later is better. The first generation five-element design was in production from 1952 to 1969. There was probably a coating upgrade in 1961 when Leitz switched from model 'names' to numbers. The second-generation five element Schneider lens was only produced from 1969/70 to 1974. The third generation six-element Focotar-2 ran from 1974 to 1980. The fourth generation Focotar-3 was prototyped in 1981. There's a table on this page itemising production dates for all versions: https://deltalenses.com/the-leica-story/
Leitz was unusually good at repairing and refurbishing these lenses, so you see quite a few anomalous factory-upgraded samples that have the wrong serial number for the model.
Incidentally, if anyone has a nice clean Focotar 2 or Focotar 3 to loan or sell, I'd like to update our test results based on a better sample. They're not currently included in the rankings. _________________ If it ain't broke, break it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2023 3:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you, Marc, for you explanation. I've read the related info on deltalenses and I already knew that Focotar-2 is considered as a step forward as compared to Focotar-1. I was wondering if the first version had variations in design affecting the IQ. Visibly not. That's also good to know! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3705 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2023 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
#3 Focotar WO
|
This scene is so cool. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you, Pancolart! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|