MFlenses - A new life in a digital age
MFLenses 2026

Manual Focus Lenses Forum

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.

Explore the world of vintage lenses through repair notes, real test shots, and detailed archive threads packed with images.
DiskFreeVault safely moves Mac apps and data to external storage.
Spotlight

Featured partner placement for the forum front page.

Canon FL 1,2/55
View previous topic :: View next topic  


Reply

First encounter with that lens. Wide open.

Irradiante | Glowing by lumens pixel, sur Flickr


Reply

It's a bit of a sleeper of a lens. I'm pretty sure it's the same optical formula as the early FD 55mm f/1.2. Of course, there are coatings differences. I own both, and I can detect no difference in photos of the same image taken with both lenses.

One thing I like about the FL version versus the FD version is the FL version's girth is noticeably less.


Reply

cooltouch wrote:
It's a bit of a sleeper of a lens. I'm pretty sure it's the same optical formula as the early FD 55mm f/1.2. Of course, there are coatings differences. I own both, and I can detect no difference in photos of the same image taken with both lenses.

One thing I like about the FL version versus the FD version is the FL version's girth is noticeably less.


I do not have the FD version but from the info on MIR website what you say is correct. I will need some time to learn this lens. What I have noticed so far is that best performance is reached beyond 80 cm. Wide open at infinity field flatness is impressive. At minimum focus distance you need to close a little bit for good clarity. I already think it is an impressive lens.


Reply

I found that the biggest challenge when shooting it wide open was making sure I didn't move. The slightest movement on my part could throw the image out of focus.


Reply

You are right. I'm on the verge of buying a 35 2,5 or 3,5 fl and experiment furthermore.