| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008
Posts: 1746
Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2021 8:47 pm Post subject: Anastigmat "PRIMAR" 1:4.5 13.5cm |
 |
|
LittleAlex wrote:
Today obtained the lens in the perfect condition. The glass in clean – no scratches, or marks. After cleaning of some inside fog it started to be completely transparent. The shutter also is in the perfect state. Very clean, and the shutter easily fires on all speeds properly.
They didn’t ask for it too much ($24), so I grabber it, however I had not had any idea what the lens is at all. Never meet anything with the name “Primarâ€. And no production company mention as well.
After hard search throughout of the Internet, surprisingly, I didn’t discover any information concerning the lens either. So, I wonder very much, what it is. And hope that maybe somebody would be able to submit to me the proper information concerning that lens.
_________________
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11044
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2021 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Lens Vademecum
Balda section has Balda Primar f6.3 105mm for 6x9 camera 1928
Hugo Meyer section mentions Primar focal camera
Zeiss section mentions Bentzin Primar Reflex camera 1932
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008
Posts: 1746
Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2021 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LittleAlex wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
Balda section has Balda Primar f6.3 105mm for 6x9 camera 1928
|
Well, but who did make that lenses? And what kind it is? After disassembling I am able to say, that it looks like either “tripletâ€, or “tessarâ€. But didn’t discover yet exactly.
_________________
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 2970
Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
Eh...who cares who made it, how does it shoot? I am betting you will be surprised at the quality of the images if you pay attention to shot selection. ie don't shoot with significant backlight. At 4.5,not fast but should be OK in morning or evening sunlight.
_________________
photos are moments frozen in time |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11044
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
| LittleAlex wrote: |
| visualopsins wrote: |
Balda section has Balda Primar f6.3 105mm for 6x9 camera 1928
|
Well, but who did make that lenses? And what kind it is? After disassembling I am able to say, that it looks like either “tripletâ€, or “tessarâ€. But didn’t discover yet exactly. |
Balda, Hugo Meyer, or Zeiss... 
| Quote: |
| Balda, Dresden, Germany Primarily a camera maker, their lenses had trade names which reflected their own, as in Baldanar, even though these lenses may have been bought in. |
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008
Posts: 1746
Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
LittleAlex wrote:
| jamaeolus wrote: |
| Eh...who cares who made it. |
I really do carry. And not only from the simple curiosity. At least I prefer to know whether it is of the “triplet†type, or the “tessar†one.
I did already try to discover it by the so called “method of reflectionsâ€, comparing reflections of the back components from the known “tessar†lens 150/4.0, and that one. And I didn’t see any difference. However, it might be also as well that I simply isn’t so good in that method.
The front lens anyway is the single lens. I know it for certain, because after I disassembled the first component, the front lens – quite surprisingly, dropped down (fortunately upon the soft surface – my slipper). Which is very unusual, because commonly in that kind of lenses the front lens is stamped into the mounting.
_________________
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008
Posts: 1746
Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
LittleAlex wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
Balda, Hugo Meyer, or Zeiss... |
Or, maybe Rodenstock, or Schneider. And way not?
_________________
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
