| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2537
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1636
Location: Sweden
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
blotafton wrote:
Yeah looks cool. 35mm and 45mm for full frame. But I'm sad to see aspheric lenses included. It will hurt bokeh unless they are made like Leica does them.
#1
#2
#3
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 2537
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2021 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
I bet the Revuenon 55mm 1.2 will kick it's ass Bokeh wise 
_________________
pentaxian |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2021 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I wouldn't want an f0.95 lens that didn't have aspheric elements as the performance would be crap. I have several Schneider cine lenses with aspheric elements and they have beautiful bokeh.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
Posts: 1636
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2021 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
| I wouldn't want an f0.95 lens that didn't have aspheric elements as the performance would be crap. I have several Schneider cine lenses with aspheric elements and they have beautiful bokeh. |
If the bokeh is free of onion rings I'm for it. A horrible example is the new Meike 50mm f/1.2. Onion rings everywhere. Strange priorities from the maker if you ask me.
But people don't seem to mind. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cbass
Joined: 27 Jul 2019
Posts: 450
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2021 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cbass wrote:
Define crap. If you are looking to shoot landscapes at f/0.95 or astro and want corner to corner sharpness, then you will need aspherical lens elements. Probably even more than just one. If you are looking for general shooting/portraits than you don't. Try a Mitakon f/0.95 lens or 7Artisans. They don't use any aspherical elements and are sharp from f/0.95 in the center. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 1632
Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2021 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
The 35mm f/0.95 would be interessing for me - portrait / sensual work most times.
I love to work with the Mitakon 50mm f/0.95, would be a interessting wideangle for that.
_________________
Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
