View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 12:36 am Post subject: Strange rays. |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
How can you explain the many subtle rays that come from a light source? Is it related to the lens design, the aperture, or something else? Who saw it. I never got that. Industiar-100U lens with helicoid, Sony NEX 5N camera.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
I believe it is an effect produced by diffraction combined with residual spherical aberration. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
I believe it is an effect produced by diffraction combined with residual spherical aberration. |
Your opinion is highly appreciated by me. It is a pity that here you can not see those who design lenses. However, other lenses failed to perform this feat. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
The effect you captured is not so unusual. It is called a "star effect". A good article on this subject:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/create-compelling-star-effects-sun-stars-starbursts-photos _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
The article is informative, but there are questions. Images of light sources in the sharpness zone are given in the article. There are specific forms of radiation of the stars. In my case, the light is completely unfocused, the shape is not a ray star, it resembles a circle with thin lines coming out of it. In addition, the lens did not close its aperture. One can temporarily accept the General nature of the phenomenon and as a special case of a particular lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:06 am Post subject: Re: Strange rays. |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
LLB! wrote: |
How can you explain the many subtle rays that come from a light source? Is it related to the lens design, the aperture, or something else? Who saw it. I never got that. Industiar-100U lens with helicoid, Sony NEX 5N camera. |
This can be a result of either internal reflection or dispersion. Or both.
For example a scratched (for full 360°) front element can disperse light in a similar fashion.
Just as the one without properly blackened edges (the edge cut is the deepest scratch there is). _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 6:34 am Post subject: Re: Strange rays. |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
LLB! wrote: |
How can you explain the many subtle rays that come from a light source? Is it related to the lens design, the aperture, or something else? Who saw it. I never got that. Industiar-100U lens with helicoid, Sony NEX 5N camera. |
This can be a result of either internal reflection or dispersion. Or both.
For example a scratched (for full 360°) front element can disperse light in a similar fashion.
Just as the one without properly blackened edges (the edge cut is the deepest scratch there is). |
mmm.. The lens is brand new, bought directly from the factory about five years ago. No scratches. However, your thoughts accompany mine more than. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Well oof highlights are sharp projections of the lens aperture opening in the image, so small imperfections in the aperture circle could cause diffraction with very strong highlights. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
Well oof highlights are sharp projections of the lens aperture opening in the image, so small imperfections in the aperture circle could cause diffraction with very strong highlights. |
Clear. But the aperture didn't work. Its blades did not participate in the creation of the image. The lens was completely open, meaning the hole was round. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
LLB! wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
Well oof highlights are sharp projections of the lens aperture opening in the image, so small imperfections in the aperture circle could cause diffraction with very strong highlights. |
Clear. But the aperture didn't work. Its blades did not participate in the creation of the image. The lens was completely open, meaning the hole was round. |
There is always an aperture of not the blades than the ring the blades are behind. At certain angles small imperfections can have large effect. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
LLB! wrote: |
D1N0 wrote: |
Well oof highlights are sharp projections of the lens aperture opening in the image, so small imperfections in the aperture circle could cause diffraction with very strong highlights. |
Clear. But the aperture didn't work. Its blades did not participate in the creation of the image. The lens was completely open, meaning the hole was round. |
There is always an aperture of not the blades than the ring the blades are behind. At certain angles small imperfections can have large effect. |
Theoretically, YES. But to get to these irregularities, the light beam must change direction two or three times. Although as clearly stated in the literature, an unsuccessful frame design can reduce the quality of optics by up to 40% down. The second argument is indisputable - this lens is built to work in a magnifier where the light flow goes in one direction. The reverse course is not provided. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 9:41 pm Post subject: Re: Strange rays. |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
LLB! wrote: |
aidaho wrote: |
LLB! wrote: |
How can you explain the many subtle rays that come from a light source? Is it related to the lens design, the aperture, or something else? Who saw it. I never got that. Industiar-100U lens with helicoid, Sony NEX 5N camera. |
This can be a result of either internal reflection or dispersion. Or both.
For example a scratched (for full 360°) front element can disperse light in a similar fashion.
Just as the one without properly blackened edges (the edge cut is the deepest scratch there is). |
mmm.. The lens is brand new, bought directly from the factory about five years ago. No scratches. However, your thoughts accompany mine more than. |
I have a round cut from LASIK on both of my lenses now and if you point a high-beam directly into my eye, this is exactly the aberration I will see.
I believe any 360° dispersion or reflection source will do the job. _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/curry-hexagon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: Strange rays. |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
LLB! wrote: |
aidaho wrote: |
LLB! wrote: |
How can you explain the many subtle rays that come from a light source? Is it related to the lens design, the aperture, or something else? Who saw it. I never got that. Industiar-100U lens with helicoid, Sony NEX 5N camera. |
This can be a result of either internal reflection or dispersion. Or both.
For example a scratched (for full 360°) front element can disperse light in a similar fashion.
Just as the one without properly blackened edges (the edge cut is the deepest scratch there is). |
mmm.. The lens is brand new, bought directly from the factory about five years ago. No scratches. However, your thoughts accompany mine more than. |
No scratches, but you are not taking into account the internal design of the lens, everything in the light path other than the lens elements themselves. There are plenty of things for the light to reflect off of or diffuse from inside the tube itself, even if coated matte black to minimize internal reflections. _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sat Aug 29, 2020 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
It is very important to understand that the rays that seem to emanate from the light source are just a visual effect caused by diffraction! In a sense, these "rays" are an optical illusion! These rays do not necessarily have a physical existence.
The light waves diffracted by the discontinuities of the lens (iris diaphragm and the edges of the optical elements) interfere with each other so that for certain angles the interference is constructive. The "rays" as seen in the photograph basically show the angles for which the interference of the diffracted waves is constructive.
I believe that there is nothing magical or special about the Industar 100U regarding the observed star effect, which nevertheless requires an appropriate combination of factors (relative intensity of the light source, lens aperture, framing, exposure, etc. ) to be visible in a photo. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 12:52 am Post subject: Re: Strange rays. |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 7:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
This is with an Angenieux projection lens, no aperture.
_________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 6:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
It is very important to understand that the rays that seem to emanate from the light source are just a visual effect caused by diffraction! In a sense, these "rays" are an optical illusion! These rays do not necessarily have a physical existence.
The light waves diffracted by the discontinuities of the lens (iris diaphragm and the edges of the optical elements) interfere with each other so that for certain angles the interference is constructive. The "rays" as seen in the photograph basically show the angles for which the interference of the diffracted waves is constructive.
I believe that there is nothing magical or special about the Industar 100U regarding the observed star effect, which nevertheless requires an appropriate combination of factors (relative intensity of the light source, lens aperture, framing, exposure, etc. ) to be visible in a photo. |
I am inclined to the specifics of the lens body, not the glasses, and to the fact that the bright light goes in the opposite direction. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
I was easily able to replicate this with a strong OOF light source (a usb led lamp) shining directly into the the lens that happened to be on my camera (Auto-Takumar 35mm 1:2.3 wide open). When you look at the sun or stars you see rays emitting/ spikes for the same reason. Diffraction effects.
_________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
I was easily able to replicate this with a strong OOF light source (a usb led lamp) shining directly into the the lens that happened to be on my camera (Auto-Takumar 35mm 1:2.3 wide open). When you look at the sun or stars you see rays emitting/ spikes for the same reason. Diffraction effects.
|
My congratulations ! You really do it ! We are the Сhampions ! Please, turn on F. Mercury song ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
[quote="LLB!"]
D1N0 wrote: |
I was easily able to replicate this with a strong OOF light source (a usb led lamp) shining directly into the the lens that happened to be on my camera (Auto-Takumar 35mm 1:2.3 wide open). When you look at the sun or stars you see rays emitting/ spikes for the same reason. Diffraction effects.
|
My congratulations ! You really did it ! We are the Сhampions ! Please, turn on F. Mercury song !
Diffraction Queen Of The Light. Or no ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1196 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
LLB! wrote: |
Please, turn on F. Mercury song ! |
Or The Beatles' "Here Comes The Sun" _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blazer0ne
Joined: 12 Sep 2018 Posts: 836
Expire: 2024-12-07
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blazer0ne wrote:
...
Last edited by Blazer0ne on Tue Feb 22, 2022 7:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LLB!
Joined: 26 Aug 2020 Posts: 59 Location: Belarus
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LLB! wrote:
Gerald wrote: |
LLB! wrote: |
Please, turn on F. Mercury song ! |
Or The Beatles' "Here Comes The Sun" |
There is only heaven and earth and between them man as the main jewel.javascript:emoticon('') |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2020 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
LLB! wrote: |
Gerald wrote: |
It is very important to understand that the rays that seem to emanate from the light source are just a visual effect caused by diffraction! In a sense, these "rays" are an optical illusion! These rays do not necessarily have a physical existence.
The light waves diffracted by the discontinuities of the lens (iris diaphragm and the edges of the optical elements) interfere with each other so that for certain angles the interference is constructive. The "rays" as seen in the photograph basically show the angles for which the interference of the diffracted waves is constructive.
I believe that there is nothing magical or special about the Industar 100U regarding the observed star effect, which nevertheless requires an appropriate combination of factors (relative intensity of the light source, lens aperture, framing, exposure, etc. ) to be visible in a photo. |
I am inclined to the specifics of the lens body, not the glasses, and to the fact that the bright light goes in the opposite direction. |
Yes, it is about internal reflections and dispersion between the elements and/or after the last element in the lens. _________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|