View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SandroB
Joined: 07 Mar 2013 Posts: 47 Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 8:20 pm Post subject: Nikon older SLR lenses |
|
|
SandroB wrote:
A few months ago I inherited a Nikkormat EL with 7 Nikon lenses and a Soligor macro zoom lens. On Nikonions.org I read that all non-Ai Nikon lenses have a letter after the name Nikon, to tell the number of the optical formula. So P would mean Penta, 5 elements. So what would then the C mean in a Micro-Nikkor -P.C 3.5/55mm?
And several of my lenses don't have such a letter, like the Nikkor 1.4/50mm, the Nikkor 2.5/105mm. About this 105mm lens I read that people differentiate between a Sonnar type and a Xenar (I think) type. How can one tell which is which?
And what would Nikkor-O Auto 2/35mm say about the optical formula?
Thanks for any information,
Lex _________________ Lenses:
Leitz/Leica Elmarit-M 2; Elmarit-M 28; Summaron 2.8/35; Summicron 35; Summilux 35; Summarit 1.5/50; Elmar 50; Elmar-M 50; Summicron 50; Summilux 50; Elmar 65; Elmar 90; Elmarit 90; Tele-Elmar 135; Elmarit 135; Telyt 4/200.
Steinheil Culminar 2.8/90
Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135
Bodies: Leica M3, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6TTL, MDa, MD-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox
Joined: 29 Apr 2017 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:32 pm Post subject: Re: Nikon older SLR lenses |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox wrote:
SandroB wrote: |
A few months ago I inherited a Nikkormat EL with 7 Nikon lenses and a Soligor macro zoom lens. On Nikonions.org I read that all non-Ai Nikon lenses have a letter after the name Nikon, to tell the number of the optical formula. So P would mean Penta, 5 elements. So what would then the C mean in a Micro-Nikkor -P.C 3.5/55mm?
And several of my lenses don't have such a letter, like the Nikkor 1.4/50mm, the Nikkor 2.5/105mm. About this 105mm lens I read that people differentiate between a Sonnar type and a Xenar (I think) type. How can one tell which is which?
And what would Nikkor-O Auto 2/35mm say about the optical formula?
Thanks for any information,
Lex |
Not all non-Ai lenses have a letter after NIKKOR. There was a generation of pre-Ai lenses, sometimes referred to as the 'K' series, between those with a letter after NIKKOR and the beginning of the Ai lenses. This page has a full list of all Nikon lenses, sorted by generation: http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html
When there's a letter and a 'C' like with your micro lens, that C means it's multicoated. There were also a few lenses that underwent an optical change with the switch to multicoating. You can reference the page I linked above to see when any change in optics occurred.
The first NIKKOR-P 105mm/2.5 lenses were of a Sonnar design, but this was changed to a Xenotar formula toward the end of the -P run. If your 105mm is -P.C or later, it's a Xenotar design. There were also some further refinements in this Xenotar lens formula over subsequent generations.
The 'O' in NIKKOR-O is for 'Octo', meaning it has eight lens elements. _________________ I quit wearing my glasses to always get good bokeh.
Whoever dies with the most lenses, wins! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SandroB
Joined: 07 Mar 2013 Posts: 47 Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SandroB wrote:
Thanks, this explains a lot. Only my 105mm is not clear to me, since it doesn't have any letter or other designations than I gave, Nikkor 2.5/105mm. Judging from the serial number it was produced in the period 1977-sept. 1981 and it makes it the Xenotar type since it was produced later than the P designated 105mm lenses.
Lex _________________ Lenses:
Leitz/Leica Elmarit-M 2; Elmarit-M 28; Summaron 2.8/35; Summicron 35; Summilux 35; Summarit 1.5/50; Elmar 50; Elmar-M 50; Summicron 50; Summilux 50; Elmar 65; Elmar 90; Elmarit 90; Tele-Elmar 135; Elmarit 135; Telyt 4/200.
Steinheil Culminar 2.8/90
Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135
Bodies: Leica M3, M4, M4-2, M4-P, M6TTL, MDa, MD-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1216 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
I found the nikonians site to be a bit on the odd side, and did not stay long.
In some cases, ill-informed opinions get confused with what is actually known about the nikkor line. It does pay to dig a little for further information.
I have a lens quite similar to your 35mm f2, except it's a tiny bit later, and is multi-coated. It's designation is O.C. nikkor. It is a lens that rapidly became a favorite with me- for it's rendering.
I have both the P and P.C 55mm f3.5 micro nikkors. They are basically the same lenses with the C version being multi-coated. The plain P version has an earlier coating that is likely a single coating.
Your 105 is most likely an A/I (aperture index tab) or A/I-s with the cut out scoop on the lens mount for Program metering with Nikon FA and newer cameras.
Finding an EL with a functioning metering system and shutter takes a bit of doing these days. The early electronics era shutter resistors that went into them were not very long lived.
Enjoy your new acquisitions!
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox
Joined: 29 Apr 2017 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2024 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox wrote:
Doc Sharptail wrote: |
I have a lens quite similar to your 35mm f2, except it's a tiny bit later, and is multi-coated. It's designation is O.C. nikkor. It is a lens that rapidly became a favorite with me- for it's rendering. |
I love this lens as well. I also have a Canon of similar vintage, the much-hyped 35mm/2 S.S.C. "concave" that sells for high prices thanks to it becoming popular with videographers. I even gave mine an extended UV treatment and completely ridded it of any yellowing. However, the Canon is obscenely large, so I heavily favor the NIKKOR-O.C in actual use. _________________ I quit wearing my glasses to always get good bokeh.
Whoever dies with the most lenses, wins! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|