alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:34 pm Post subject: delta 3200 shot at 1600 |
|
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:34 pm Post subject: delta 3200 shot at 1600 |
|
|
alaios wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to ask if someone has samples of delta 3200, shot at 1600 and then developed normally.
I will try it myself but sometimes it is fun to check what others have tried as well
Alex
_________________
“The fact is that relatively few photographers ever master their medium. Instead they allow the medium to master them and go on an endless squirrel cage chase from new lens to new paper to new developer to new gadget, never staying with one piece of equipment long enough to learn its full capacities, becoming lost in a maze of technical information that is of little or no use since they don’t know what to do with it”
(written at 1927 by Edward Weston) |
|
Kei
Joined: 08 Jan 2015
Posts: 142
Location: S. Wales UK
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2017 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kei wrote:
Bit late on this one, but I shot some delta 3200 as 1600 and processed as normal in D76 over the new year. The results were excellent. These were all shot using a mamiya 645.
 Nut Cracker-Delta3200-AFD-16 by Kyle, on Flickr
 NewYears-2017-Delta3200-AFD-12 by Kyle, on Flickr
 NewYears-2017-Delta3200-AFD-06 by Kyle, on Flickr
 Llandegfedd-Delta3200-AFD-14 by Kyle, on Flickr
_________________
Contax Zeiss Distagon 35mm f1.4, Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Zeiss Vario-sonnar 35-70mm f3.4
Mamiya RB/RZ67 RZ67 Pro II, 65mm f4 L-A, 75mm f4.5 Shift, 127mm f3.5 K/L
Mamiya m645 645 1000S, 645J, 645AFD M 35mm f3.5 C, 55mm f2.8 AF, 80mm f1.9 N, 80mm f2.8 C, 120mm f4 macro, 150mm f2.8 A, 210mm f4 ULD, 210mm f4 C
Tamron Primes 17mm f3.5, 24mm f2.5, 90mm f2.8, 135mm f2.5, 180mm f2.5, 300mm f5.6
Tamron Zooms 24-48mm f3.5-3.8, 28-80 f3.5-4.2, 35-80 f2.8-3.8, 70-210mm f3.5, 75-250mm f3.5-5.6
Olympus OM Zuiko 24mm f2.8, Zuiko 28mm f2.8, Zuiko 50mm f1.8, Sigma 600mm f8
Nikon MF 24mm f2.8 N.C, 28mm f2 AI-s, 35mm f1.4 AI-s, 50mm f1.2 AI-s, 50mm f1.8 AI-s, 135mm f2.8 AI, 300mm f2.8 AI-s
Nikon AF F5, D810 16mm f2.8 AF-D, 20mm f1.8 AF-S, 55mm f2.8 AF micro, Tokina 100mm f2.8 macro, 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D
Canon FD T90, T50, AT-1, 50mm f1.8, 135mm f3.5
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015
Posts: 1721
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
1 and 4 very good. Exact exposed. Very good zone 5.
2 and 3 a bit overexposed for my taste.
The skin fall in zone 6,5/7, and I should put it in zone 5,5/6.
Taste question, no more. |
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
very useful to share your photos! The reason for me to overxpose the ilford 3200 is that you can develop normal at my lab with no extra price range.
The other alternatiev will be the hp4 pushed to 1600. The grain will be similar though at the end, if I can "interpret" correctly the results.
Alex
_________________
“The fact is that relatively few photographers ever master their medium. Instead they allow the medium to master them and go on an endless squirrel cage chase from new lens to new paper to new developer to new gadget, never staying with one piece of equipment long enough to learn its full capacities, becoming lost in a maze of technical information that is of little or no use since they don’t know what to do with it”
(written at 1927 by Edward Weston) |
|
