View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
revinhood
Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 53 Location: España
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: pentax 70-210 or vivitar 70-210 |
|
|
revinhood wrote:
I want a good telezoom, and which will not be better, Pentax 70-210 f / 4 or 1 Vivitar series f / 3.5.? _________________ Pentax k100d / sigma 18-200 / pentax 50mm f/1,4 / samyang 8mm
Canon 5d + 40d / Canon 24-70 L / canon 70-200 L / tamron 90mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sandie
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 217 Location: Austria
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sandie wrote:
I suggest you try NikKor E 70-210mm f/4.0. _________________ Canon 5DII + Canon 5D + Canon 350D + Pentax MZ10 + Pracktica BX20 + Mamiya 1000TL + Yashica TL Electro X + Yashica FR1 + Pentax ES II
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 20/f4, Flektogon 35/f2.4, Pancolar 50/f1.4, Pancolar 50/f1.8, Tessar 50/f2.8, Pancolar 80/f1.8, Sonnar 135/f3.5, Sonnar 135/f4, Sonnar 180/f2.8;
Pentacon: 50/f1.8, 135/f2.8, 200/f4, 300/f4;
Meyer: Orestegon 29/f2.8, Lydith 30/f3.5, Domiplan 50/f2.8, Trioplan 100/f2.8, Orestor 100/f2.8, Telemegor 250/f5.5;
Revuenon: 24/f4(Ennalyt), 28/f3.5(Ennalyt), 200/f3.5(Tomioka);
Yashica: 28/f2.8; 55/f1.2;
Soligor 135/f2.8; 35/f2.8;
Misc: Schacht 50/f2.8; Steinheil 135/f3.5; Mamiya 55/f1.4; Fujinon 135/f3.5; Tokina 70-220/f3.5; Tamron 28/f2.5; Helios 58/f2; Kiron 28/f2; Volna 80/f2.8; Mir 24M 35/f2;Carenar 85-210/f4.5; Olympus 50/f1.8; Chinon 35-80/f3.5-4.9; Pentax 55/f2; |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Tamron SP any of them. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
revinhood
Do you interpret the guy's opinion as I do? None of both?
Rino _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revinhood
Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 53 Location: España
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revinhood wrote:
should be to mount Pentax.
another option better?
which? _________________ Pentax k100d / sigma 18-200 / pentax 50mm f/1,4 / samyang 8mm
Canon 5d + 40d / Canon 24-70 L / canon 70-200 L / tamron 90mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 5745 Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
revinhood wrote: |
should be to mount Pentax.
another option better?
which? |
I would follow Attila's advice. Any TAMRON SP with a PK-Adpatall adapter will do a good job...
I got a TAMRON SP 70-210, 3.5-4 MACRO and it is a wonderful lens. Better if you can get the one with fixed aperture in all the range, but this one is not expensive.
It works fine in my K10D.
You can see it mounted on my previous K100D Super in this thread:
http://forum.mflenses.com/big-boy-tamron-sp-70-210-got-home-t6562,highlight,tamron.html
Jes. _________________ Jesito, Moderator
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
The only problem with the Adaptalls is that K mounts and K-A mounts especially cost a good deal of money. Even lenses that have a K adaptall go higher than ones with some other adapter. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
convert1
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 100 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
convert1 wrote:
I converted Vivitar series 1 3,5/70-210 to EF mount and compare in 135 mm position with Pentax SMC Takumar 3,5/135, Carl Zeiss Jena MC Sonnar 3,5/135, Canon EF 2/135 L.
I know, it is not fair to compare zoom with prime lens..., but the result can be seen athttp://www.flickr.com/photos/29149282@N07/
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
csaba369
Joined: 08 Feb 2008 Posts: 172 Location: Hungary
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
csaba369 wrote:
I have the second Vivitar 70-210 S1. At first, I don't like it. Sold it. No I bought one, because I can make better mastering on pics, and missing that full of metal and glass. On 350D there was problem with the green colors. Now it can easily correct in Lightroom or PS. Very-very sharp lens, better with 2x then CZJ Sonnar 2.8/200! Quite good macro mode. My version is a Kiron made modell with M42 mount.
Tamron 19AH maybe better, I don't know, will try. But only the 19AH!!! Not the others! But that is not a cheap one.
By me, Kiron made Vivitar S1 70-210 is a very good zoom lens, good performer for that price.
More info:
http://www.robertstech.com/vivitar.htm _________________ A lot of MF lenses, Panasonic G1, EOS 300V, Zorki 4, Kiev 4, Pentacon Six etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
soikka
Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 534 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
soikka wrote:
revinhood wrote: |
should be to mount Pentax.
another option better?
which? |
I have Pentax A70-210/4 and I think that it isn't a bad choice at all. It has great coatings and it is sharp at every aperture.
There's also a macro mode at 70mm and the A-position helps the use of the lens with DSLR's.
Compared to some other lenses I have, the A70-210 is a little bit less sharp than the Tamron SP 80-200/2.8, but has better coatings. It is also a bit sharper than the DA50-200/4-5.6 and M75-150/4 I have.
Don't have any experience with Vivitars, but I've heard they are great too. _________________ DSLR: K-5,K20d+Grip, Ist*Ds
Film: MZ-5n, LX, MX+winder, SuperA+winder, ME Super,
M-series: 28/2.8, 35/2, 40/2.8, 135/3.5, 75-150/4, A-series: 50/1.7, Super-Taks: 55/1.8, 105/2.8, S-M-C Taks: 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, Sigma SW2 24/2.8, Tamron SPs: 90/2.5(I), 180/2.5, 500/8, Rikenon XR 35-70/3.5, Cosinon 40/2.5, F-1.7x AF-adapter, Olympus XA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
soikka
Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 534 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
soikka wrote:
convert1 wrote: |
I converted Vivitar series 1 3,5/70-210 to EF mount and compare in 135 mm position with Pentax SMC Takumar 3,5/135, Carl Zeiss Jena MC Sonnar 3,5/135, Canon EF 2/135 L.
I know, it is not fair to compare zoom with prime lens..., but the result can be seen athttp://www.flickr.com/photos/29149282@N07/
Regards |
Autch, that's not that great result with the zoom.
Are these crops? _________________ DSLR: K-5,K20d+Grip, Ist*Ds
Film: MZ-5n, LX, MX+winder, SuperA+winder, ME Super,
M-series: 28/2.8, 35/2, 40/2.8, 135/3.5, 75-150/4, A-series: 50/1.7, Super-Taks: 55/1.8, 105/2.8, S-M-C Taks: 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, Sigma SW2 24/2.8, Tamron SPs: 90/2.5(I), 180/2.5, 500/8, Rikenon XR 35-70/3.5, Cosinon 40/2.5, F-1.7x AF-adapter, Olympus XA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
convert1 wrote: |
I converted Vivitar series 1 3,5/70-210 to EF mount and compare in 135 mm position with Pentax SMC Takumar 3,5/135, Carl Zeiss Jena MC Sonnar 3,5/135, Canon EF 2/135 L.
I know, it is not fair to compare zoom with prime lens..., but the result can be seen athttp://www.flickr.com/photos/29149282@N07/
Regards |
Id keep the Tak and sell the others. :p _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
soikka
Joined: 11 Jun 2008 Posts: 534 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
soikka wrote:
zewrak wrote: |
Id keep the Tak and sell the others. :p |
This could have been seen from your signature .
Do you know how the 135/3.5 Takumar compares to the M135?
Ps. I'd do the same. _________________ DSLR: K-5,K20d+Grip, Ist*Ds
Film: MZ-5n, LX, MX+winder, SuperA+winder, ME Super,
M-series: 28/2.8, 35/2, 40/2.8, 135/3.5, 75-150/4, A-series: 50/1.7, Super-Taks: 55/1.8, 105/2.8, S-M-C Taks: 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, Sigma SW2 24/2.8, Tamron SPs: 90/2.5(I), 180/2.5, 500/8, Rikenon XR 35-70/3.5, Cosinon 40/2.5, F-1.7x AF-adapter, Olympus XA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
soikka wrote: |
zewrak wrote: |
Id keep the Tak and sell the others. :p |
This could have been seen from your signature .
Do you know how the 135/3.5 Takumar compares to the M135?
Ps. I'd do the same. |
Well, from what I can see from those pictures, I think the Takumar outperform the others, especially on contrast. I'll probably be beaten with a stick soon enough for saying a Takumar outperform a Zeiss though . Just hang tight.
The only SMC Pentax-M lens that I have tried that I feel is better then the Super Takumar equal is the 200/4. I can't say that the 135 perform any better then the Super Tak. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots
Last edited by zewrak on Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revinhood
Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 53 Location: España
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revinhood wrote:
zewrak, Takuma that you think are the best in your team?
I also have a K10D _________________ Pentax k100d / sigma 18-200 / pentax 50mm f/1,4 / samyang 8mm
Canon 5d + 40d / Canon 24-70 L / canon 70-200 L / tamron 90mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
revinhood wrote: |
zewrak, Takuma that you think are the best in your team?
I also have a K10D |
Hmm. Best? Hard to say really. My favourites/most used on the K10D is 55/1.8 and 135/3.5.
But I have to say that the 50/1.4, 85/1.9/1.8 and 105/2.8 did not get their reputation by accident.
If you are eager to try Takumars out, get the 55/1.8 and 135/3.5. The 55/1.8 _often_ go on ebay for less then 20$. And the 135 often for less then 50$.
The 85 can sometime end at 200$ _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revinhood
Joined: 29 May 2008 Posts: 53 Location: España
|
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
revinhood wrote:
zewrak wrote: |
revinhood wrote: |
zewrak, Takuma that you think are the best in your team?
I also have a K10D |
Hmm. Best? Hard to say really. My favourites/most used on the K10D is 55/1.8 and 135/3.5.
But I have to say that the 50/1.4, 85/1.9/1.8 and 105/2.8 did not get their reputation by accident.
If you are eager to try Takumars out, get the 55/1.8 and 135/3.5. The 55/1.8 _often_ go on ebay for less then 20$. And the 135 often for less then 50$.
The 85 can sometime end at 200$ |
ok, ok, i like this 135mm, jejeje.
thanks _________________ Pentax k100d / sigma 18-200 / pentax 50mm f/1,4 / samyang 8mm
Canon 5d + 40d / Canon 24-70 L / canon 70-200 L / tamron 90mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edri
Joined: 26 Oct 2014 Posts: 315 Location: walking in the air
|
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
edri wrote:
Is the Pentax A 70-210/4 with a rotating front element or not? I read on the internet about both variants.
How are Vivitar Series 1 and Kiron zoom lock, with rotating front element or not? _________________ http://www.adlightstill.smugmug.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|