Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Urban landscape with Hexanon AR 135/3.2
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:56 am    Post subject: Urban landscape with Hexanon AR 135/3.2 Reply with quote

A 135mm is not the best for urban landscape, but serves for fun and play and some detail that we do not have access...
Direct JPG from camera, neutral settings, EXIF available.

At f/3.2

Full resolution: https://www.dropbox.com/s/m72lr487vugdvj0/Hexanon%20AR%20135%20f3.2%20a%20f3.2.JPG?dl=0

At f/5.6

Full resolution: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0pvv446v2uhyyng/Hexanon%20AR%20135%20f3.2.JPG?dl=0

Happy shots!

Sorry, I edit to change model. It is 3.2 and not 3.5


Last edited by anktonio on Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:09 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like 1 Like 1 Like 1


PostPosted: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like 1


PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like 1


PostPosted: Sat Dec 24, 2016 8:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great sample shots.


PostPosted: Sun Dec 25, 2016 5:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


Like 1 Like 1 Like 1 Laugh 1


Last edited by memetph on Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:37 am; edited 2 times in total


PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2016 6:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff Zen wrote:
PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


thumbs up emoticon is substitute for "I like it but now I haven't got time for analysis."

Like 1


PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


f u

(how's that??)


PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 3:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aspen wrote:
Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


f u

(how's that??)

Well, since you're asking... pretty infantile. Jeff's comment was rather unkind, but yours is downright disgraceful.
I think it is unfair to subject members on this list to the spectacle of insults being thrown about.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

konicamera wrote:
aspen wrote:
Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


f u

(how's that??)

Well, since you're asking... pretty infantile. Jeff's comment was rather unkind, but yours is downright disgraceful.
I think it is unfair to subject members on this list to the spectacle of insults being thrown about.


Agreed.
This forum has functioned very well when we are courteous and show respect.
Discourtesy not appreciated.
OH


PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 7:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oldhand wrote:
This forum has functioned very well when we are courteous and show respect.
Discourtesy not appreciated.


+1

I fully agree and support your statement.


PostPosted: Thu Dec 29, 2016 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I looked at the second photo and immediately thought, that looks like Granada.
You have many lovely things to photograph, i grew up there for 20 years and love the place.
Excellent shots


PostPosted: Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

eddieitman wrote:
I looked at the second photo and immediately thought, that looks like Granada.
You have many lovely things to photograph, i grew up there for 20 years and love the place.
Excellent shots

Yes, it is a view of Granada from the Albaicín, a typical neighborhood. A old beautiful city, bright, good food and friendly people. You know it...

Thanks to all!


PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

konicamera wrote:
aspen wrote:
Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


f u

(how's that??)

Well, since you're asking... pretty infantile. Jeff's comment was rather unkind, but yours is downright disgraceful.
I think it is unfair to subject members on this list to the spectacle of insults being thrown about.


Two letters are insulting? I'm ashamed that you would find insult in wit or sharp denouncements. The man's pleading for verbiage in leau of a simple emoticon is misdirected. If he wants the emoticons not to be used then he should address the the web designer and plead for their removal. We asked for them however so that we could use them. DO you wish to go over that history?
Obscenis, peream, Priape, si non
uti me pudet improbisque verbis
sed cum tu posito deus pudore
ostendas mihi coleos patentes
cum cunno mihi mentula est vocanda


PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aspen wrote:
konicamera wrote:
aspen wrote:
Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


f u

(how's that??)

Well, since you're asking... pretty infantile. Jeff's comment was rather unkind, but yours is downright disgraceful.
I think it is unfair to subject members on this list to the spectacle of insults being thrown about.


Two letters are insulting? I'm ashamed that you would find insult in wit or sharp denouncements. The man's pleading for verbiage in leau of a simple emoticon is misdirected. If he wants the emoticons not to be used then he should address the the web designer and plead for their removal. We asked for them however so that we could use them. DO you wish to go over that history?
Obscenis, peream, Priape, si non
uti me pudet improbisque verbis
sed cum tu posito deus pudore
ostendas mihi coleos patentes
cum cunno mihi mentula est vocanda

I do say, you did oblige with the verbiage, didn’t you – and with obscenity disguised as erudition to boot. You do indeed seem to know what you’re taking about. Obviously civil behavior was too much to ask for.


PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

memetph wrote:
Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


Like 1 Like 1 Like 1 Laugh 1


It looks that I was the only one to agree with Jeff Zen .


PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

konicamera wrote:
aspen wrote:
konicamera wrote:
aspen wrote:
Jeff Zen wrote:
Nice color and rendering. Definitely a decent lens. Thanks for posting.

PS. The thumbs-up emoticon is no substitute for substantive comments and conversation. Boring and lazy.


f u

(how's that??)

Well, since you're asking... pretty infantile. Jeff's comment was rather unkind, but yours is downright disgraceful.
I think it is unfair to subject members on this list to the spectacle of insults being thrown about.


Two letters are insulting? I'm ashamed that you would find insult in wit or sharp denouncements. The man's pleading for verbiage in leau of a simple emoticon is misdirected. If he wants the emoticons not to be used then he should address the the web designer and plead for their removal. We asked for them however so that we could use them. DO you wish to go over that history?
Obscenis, peream, Priape, si non
uti me pudet improbisque verbis
sed cum tu posito deus pudore
ostendas mihi coleos patentes
cum cunno mihi mentula est vocanda

I do say, you did oblige with the verbiage, didn�t you � and with obscenity disguised as erudition to boot. You do indeed seem to know what you�re taking about. Obviously civil behavior was too much to ask for.

Members that have been here longer and posted more than Jeff Zen were criticized as "lazy and boring" and when I use the simplest phrase of defiance you call me infantile.
The person who graciously submits examples of their lens doesn't want their thread highjacked by off topic garbage. If Mr.Zen had a problem with me using an emoticon he should have PM'd me. But he chose this public forum to do so and I responded with as little flair as necessary. I got my point across. You, however, want to continue the garbage even though you acknowledge he was wrong. We can continue this in private, when you wish to apologize, and where it should have been done in the beginning.


PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very nice shots, OP. The Hexanon 135mm f3.2 always seemed to me the best of the Hexanon 135 lot, and of course they ALL are great lenses. Acting on my belief a number of years ago, I paid between three and four times the amount back then that I would need to pay today for that same lens. Indeed, the lens now is a wonderful bargain IMO, considering its very high quality. And there are usually quite a few of the f3.2 lenses on the market.