View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thebbm
Joined: 11 Dec 2013 Posts: 294 Location: France montpellier
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 10:44 pm Post subject: konica hexanon 65-135mm f4 on sony nex 6 |
|
|
thebbm wrote:
Hello
this is some shoots taken with this lens (all wide open f4, handled and sun begin to go so i have not so high shutter speed) , post prod for color rendition a +15 sharpening on DXO
I found the lens pretty nice.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1659
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2016 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Nice lens.
Almost all hexanons till the 80's has cold tonalities.
Medium contrast, good sharpness (enought at the least).
Prone to flare, with small CA.
There are a lot to know about it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2964 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
I have this lens. I think I paid 25 USD. It has ridiculous performance for the price. Few others in the short tele zoom range that meet this performance for that price. (this is a really odd range!) _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thebbm
Joined: 11 Dec 2013 Posts: 294 Location: France montpellier
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
thebbm wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
I have this lens. I think I paid 25 USD. It has ridiculous performance for the price. Few others in the short tele zoom range that meet this performance for that price. (this is a really odd range!) |
by ridiculous you mean good or bad
the range is short compared to 70-200 but this lens is sharper than my vivitar 70-200mm so i prefere it. The 24mm f2.8 is good to |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mr G
Joined: 27 Jan 2014 Posts: 187 Location: London & Essex
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr G wrote:
I have a Canon fd 50-135 f3.5, quite a similar focal range, now I've moved up to full frame I'll have to give it a spin, only cost me £22gbp. Don't know how image quality is compared to the Hex, unfortunately it's dark when I go to work and dark when I come home now, Will try and post some pics at the weekend. _________________ EVEN A BLIND SQUIRREL FINDS A NUT NOW AND THEN! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2964 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
thebbm wrote: |
jamaeolus wrote: |
I have this lens. I think I paid 25 USD. It has ridiculous performance for the price. Few others in the short tele zoom range that meet this performance for that price. (this is a really odd range!) |
by ridiculous you mean good or bad
the range is short compared to 70-200 but this lens is sharper than my vivitar 70-200mm so i prefere it. The 24mm f2.8 is good to |
Ridiculous in a good way. The lens is a tank though and not something you would want to carry around all the time. I have to agree regarding performance of Konica lenses. I have quite a range and IMHO the performance to price ratio for most of the range is the best amongst brand products. They are likely to go up though as mirrorless viewfinder cameras increase in popularity. Currently the fact that Nikon or Canon SLR's won't work with them reduces demand. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|