View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Piotr Krochmal
Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:22 pm Post subject: Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm f/8 55BB |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal wrote:
Hi,
As always, with adaptall lenses, all technical info can be found http://www.adaptall-2.com/lenses/55BB.html
I have been hunting this lens in Poland from some long time. I had Tokina 500mm. It was good lens I sold it to my friend also pentaxian.
But 500mm 55BB lens is a stellar.
it is much more contrast. And it is also bigger.
But worth to buy.
_________________ Pentax K1, K5 and only few manual lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7795 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
It's a lens I wanted for a long time, I bought one and it was very poor, I got a refund. Last year I found another at a good price, it's a good lens - very good. I don't use it a lot, but when I do it always impress's me. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I have the 55BB and I love mine. It is very sharp with great contrast.
Piotr, I have a question about your second photo. It appears it was taken in a darkened location with only stage lighting available to illuminate the violinist. Given the 55BB's fixed f/8 aperture, what ISO were you having to use to get that shot? Were you using a monopod or other sort of tool to stabilize the shot? Also, what camera did you use? _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013 Posts: 356 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
It is a fine lens but it needs good light or a sensor that works well at high ISOs. It is probably operating at the equivalent brightness of f11, and even so it is tough to nail focus.
Would be interesting to try it on an A7II series camera - the amplified brightness of the EVF, focus aids and stabilisation would really help |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal
Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal wrote:
@cooltouch.
Yes, photo have been make at stage.
I use K1 ISO was 12800. Post in Capture one as it gives me better colours.
All my photos have full exif embedded. I use exif viewer for firefox.
That day I also used combo 600mm from Tamron adaptall 300mm 2.8 + 2x TC = 600mm 5.6 and it give me iso aroud 6400. but it is much heavier _________________ Pentax K1, K5 and only few manual lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4065 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
hmm ... i recently got one as well, but haven't yet compared it to other 8/500mm RF lenses!! Some more work to do ... It certainly will have less CA than the Canon nFD 2.8/400mm L ... but then: the bokeh _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edri
Joined: 26 Oct 2014 Posts: 315 Location: walking in the air
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 2:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
edri wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
It's a lens I wanted for a long time, I bought one and it was very poor, I got a refund. Last year I found another at a good price, it's a good lens - very good. I don't use it a lot, but when I do it always impress's me. |
I have a lens of this on its way from an ebay seller. I hope not to be this poor copy. I actually was thinking to buy a MTO 500/8 lens, but so it has completed an auction, I bought Tamron Adaptall SP 500/8 first version. I hope that I chose well. _________________ http://www.adlightstill.smugmug.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1318 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
I've also had a bad 55BB, there is a thread here about it:
http://forum.mflenses.com/tamron-adaptall-500mm-55bb-disappointing-iq-help-t66320,highlight,%2Btamron+%2B500mm.html
but overall I think these are optics that deserve their good reputation. I acquired another one, it was just a cash converters chance (price was right) but no problems - sharp!
Note that these are easy lenses to eg clean a bit of fungus off the mirror or objective. Not so easy if there is fungus in the rear assembly. And delamination of a rear doublet is not uncommon and can't be fixed, gives rainbow reflections when scrutinised. However that doesn't usually noticeably affect IQ (doesn't on my 350mm 06B). _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3245 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:19 pm Post subject: Re: Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm f/8 55BB |
|
|
Himself wrote:
I think that Attila bought that domain a while ago. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7795 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
edri wrote: |
Lloydy wrote: |
It's a lens I wanted for a long time, I bought one and it was very poor, I got a refund. Last year I found another at a good price, it's a good lens - very good. I don't use it a lot, but when I do it always impress's me. |
I have a lens of this on its way from an ebay seller. I hope not to be this poor copy. I actually was thinking to buy a MTO 500/8 lens, but so it has completed an auction, I bought Tamron Adaptall SP 500/8 first version. I hope that I chose well. |
I bought the first copy in a charity shop for £80, it was in its case and very well used, the paint was worn off in many places; which I didn't mind as to me it showed that the lens was regularly used so it was probably going to be OK. Sadly it wasn't and I got a refund. I think that the lens might have been dropped after it was donated to the charity, nobody could have used that lens so much and tolerated such bad results.
These are very good, sharp, lenses. I think they are only likely to be poor if they have dropped. They need careful testing on a tripod as soon as you get them.
The second lens I got was from a friend who sadly has dementia, and it's perfect. Except for the fact the filters aren't with the lens and he hasn't got a clue where they are, or indeed what they are. So, if anyone finds a set of filters for this lens, I will buy them. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:19 am Post subject: Re: Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm f/8 55BB |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
Well, not "always" -- I just picked up an Adaptall-2 lens - a 47A - and I can't find it listed on that site (unless I'm just looking in the wrong place) (but which is ~not~ to say that it's not a great resource for a lot of classic Tamron lenses).
In regard to the Tamron SP 500/8 mirrors - in my experience, ~both~ the 55B and the 55BB are really sweet 500/8 mirrors, with very high "bang-for-the-buck"ratio. _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal
Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal wrote:
@fwcetus if you know better site for tamron and especially adaptall lenses please share I found only www I put in post.
thanks for help _________________ Pentax K1, K5 and only few manual lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Hi Lloyd I have extra set of rear filters for Tamron 500 mm f8 reflex if you need.Regards _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
Piotr Krochmal wrote: |
@fwcetus if you know better site for tamron and especially adaptall lenses please share I found only www I put in post. thanks for help |
No, Piotr, I don't know of a better Tamron site -- I just pointed out that it is not 100% complete -- don't forget that I did say, "(but which is ~not~ to say that it's not a great resource for a lot of classic Tamron lenses)", although I perhaps could/should have said, "(but which is ~not~ to say that it's not still the best resource for a lot of classic Tamron lenses)". You were helpful in pointing out that site for anyone who was not aware of it. _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7795 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
kryss wrote: |
Hi Lloyd I have extra set of rear filters for Tamron 500 mm f8 reflex if you need.Regards |
Yes I do ! I'll send a PM kryss. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
OK wilco. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Piotr Krochmal wrote: |
@cooltouch.
Yes, photo have been make at stage.
I use K1 ISO was 12800. Post in Capture one as it gives me better colours.
All my photos have full exif embedded. I use exif viewer for firefox.
That day I also used combo 600mm from Tamron adaptall 300mm 2.8 + 2x TC = 600mm 5.6 and it give me iso aroud 6400. but it is much heavier |
Thanks for your reply.
You know, it's odd. I was just sitting here a short while ago, thinking about comparing my 55BB against my Tamron 300/2.8 with 2x TC and see how they compared. Last year, I did a comparison with all of my long telephotos, shooting the moon when it was full, but I didn't take good notes, so I wasn't able to figure out which were which afterward. So maybe I'll try it again this time, but just with the 55bb and the 300/2.8 with 2x. My 300/2.8 is one of my sharpest telephotos -- if not the sharpest -- so I'm interested in seeing how the 55bb compares with it.
Have you done any comparisons with yours? _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal
Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal wrote:
For short distances there is no big differences. But I don't make tests at infinity. I read that 55bb is not best option for infinity. So I wait for your tests
Unfortunatelly in Poland we have almost winter. cold nights lot of air pollution so this is not best time to test infinity.
K1 + 500mm 55BB
K1 + 300mm 60B + quite simple 2x TC
K1 + 300mm 60B
[/img] _________________ Pentax K1, K5 and only few manual lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1318 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:33 pm Post subject: Re: Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm f/8 55BB |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
fwcetus wrote: |
Well, not "always" -- I just picked up an Adaptall-2 lens - a 47A - and I can't find it listed on that site (unless I'm just looking in the wrong place) (but which is ~not~ to say that it's not a great resource for a lot of classic Tamron lenses). |
This list of adaptall-2 and SP lenses includes the ones missing from adaptall-2.com.
http://www.gyes.eu/documents/tamron-adaptall-2_lenses.pdf _________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TeemÅ
Joined: 07 Apr 2016 Posts: 586 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TeemÅ wrote:
I read that this one was better than the Minolta RF Rokkor 500mm F8 which is already considered one of the best. Is that right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:28 pm Post subject: Re: Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm f/8 55BB |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
marcusBMG wrote: |
fwcetus wrote: |
Well, not "always" -- I just picked up an Adaptall-2 lens - a 47A - and I can't find it listed on that site (unless I'm just looking in the wrong place) (but which is ~not~ to say that it's not a great resource for a lot of classic Tamron lenses). |
This list of adaptall-2 and SP lenses includes the ones missing from adaptall-2.com.
http://www.gyes.eu/documents/tamron-adaptall-2_lenses.pdf |
Yes, that's a good resource, too, showing dates and price info at a glance, as well as links to English machine translations of relevant pages from http://www.tamron.co.jp/ . _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
Piotr Krochmal wrote: |
For short distances there is no big differences. But I don't make tests at infinity. I read that 55bb is not best option for infinity. So I wait for your tests
Unfortunatelly in Poland we have almost winter. cold nights lot of air pollution so this is not best time to test infinity. [...3 more images...] |
I really like those chamber music photos, Piotr -- I have never thought about using a 500mm mirror for a (presumably) small concert, and I think it is interesting that one of the mirror's main weaknesses - "doughnut bokeh" - is not much of a problem at all (it's just barely visible) because of the relatively "empty" backgrounds. Good work.
_________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7795 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
TeemÅ wrote: |
I read that this one was better than the Minolta RF Rokkor 500mm F8 which is already considered one of the best. Is that right? |
I've got the AF version of the Rokkor, and it very good indeed, I need to do a shootout between them, maybe throw the Canon FD 500 in as well? _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal
Joined: 17 Aug 2014 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Piotr Krochmal wrote:
fwcetus wrote: |
Piotr Krochmal wrote: |
For short distances there is no big differences. But I don't make tests at infinity. I read that 55bb is not best option for infinity. So I wait for your tests
Unfortunatelly in Poland we have almost winter. cold nights lot of air pollution so this is not best time to test infinity. [...3 more images...] |
I really like those chamber music photos, Piotr -- I have never thought about using a 500mm mirror for a (presumably) small concert, and I think it is interesting that one of the mirror's main weaknesses - "doughnut bokeh" - is not much of a problem at all (it's just barely visible) because of the relatively "empty" backgrounds. Good work.
|
Thanks . _________________ Pentax K1, K5 and only few manual lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shapencolour
Joined: 03 Oct 2013 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2016 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: Tamron Adaptall-2 500mm f/8 55BB |
|
|
shapencolour wrote:
Piotr Krochmal wrote: |
Hi,
As always, with adaptall lenses, all technical info can be found http://www.adaptall-2.com/lenses/55BB.html
I have been hunting this lens in Poland from some long time. I had Tokina 500mm. It was good lens I sold it to my friend also pentaxian.
But 500mm 55BB lens is a stellar.
it is much more contrast. And it is also bigger.
But worth to buy.
|
_________________ shapencolour |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|