View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kansalliskalaCafe
Joined: 23 Jul 2015 Posts: 602 Location: South Finland, countryside
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 12:41 pm Post subject: Industar 61 or Micro-Nikkor 55/2.8 for 14,6 mpix? |
|
|
kansalliskalaCafe wrote:
Sound like a strange question but the first one you can buy with 20 euros and the latter one is around and above 100 euros. And I'm not planning to buy FF Nikon body, at least for a while. _________________ (my normal account password still on another computer) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
you must mean Industar 61 L/Z, because rangefinder version L/D isn't close focusing _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5038 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
No, I actually do mean the rangefinder version.
Don't know if there is sense in this comparison, I'd just like to have a sharpish short tele to a crop camera.
Cheap _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
well, both are good lenses, only be careful with industar because of sample variance _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
Those lenses are not comparable... This nikkor is one of the sharpest lenses ever and the industar is one of the cheapest Russian crap for rangefinder. I can easily say that the nikkor will be sharper at 2.8 and the industar will never get that sharp at any aperture. Even the later macro model 61 L/Z is not micro nikkor sharp...
If you are looking for something small to stick on your mirrorless camera... than maybe you must take a look for other lenses. The micro nikkor is not small and compact but in terms of sharpness... it is difficult task to find something that sharp for that kind of money. _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Some late cheap 50s from late 70s to 80s are sharp enough on your 14MP camera if they stopped down to F2.8 even in the corners. For example, the Minolta MD 50/2(49mm filter). _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
newst
Joined: 21 Oct 2014 Posts: 617 Location: Troy, MI USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
newst wrote:
If you would like a smallish (for SLR) 50mm, inexpensive and super cheap, look into the Zenitar M 1.7/50.
For smaller, high quality but still not very expensive rangefinder lens I would look to the Jupiter-8 2.0/50. _________________ Steve
Just an armadillo on the shoulder of the information superhighway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1621 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
I got two I61's, one l/d. Both kind of lack the crispness you'd expect when stopping down. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Can also look at the Nikkor 55/3.5 macro, I bought one a few weeks ago for $20
Just about any macro will be good, and likely better than the I61 _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5038 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
Lightshow wrote: |
Can also look at the Nikkor 55/3.5 macro, I bought one a few weeks ago for $20 |
I'd buy also, but they are not widely available at that price any more. I had one but sold it too cheap _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick1779
Joined: 17 May 2013 Posts: 1207 Location: Italy
Expire: 2014-06-06
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rick1779 wrote:
newst wrote: |
If you would like a smallish (for SLR) 50mm, inexpensive and super cheap, look into the Zenitar M 1.7/50.
For smaller, high quality but still not very expensive rangefinder lens I would look to the Jupiter-8 2.0/50. |
or the industar M2S 50/2 _________________ TELLTALE
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|