Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Building "optimum" lens from several identical one
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 8:42 am    Post subject: Building "optimum" lens from several identical one Reply with quote

Hey all,

I own three different Hexanon 50/1.7 and each one has something that I don't like. One has a nice smooth focusing ring and good aperture, but the front glass has lots of micro scratches (not visible at all on photos), one has a perfect barrel but the aperture is soft and doesn't open completely, and the last one has a perfect front lens but soft aperture and focusing ring is too soft, too.

Do you think I can get the perfect front lens from one and put it on the lens that works best diaphragm and focus-wise ? What I'd like to know is if the front element is the same one from lens to lens and can be swapped. I did that on a 40/1.8 without any problem so I guess it should be OK but want to make sure. This way, I'll have all the best elements.

I know how to take them apart (except the diaphragm which is a nightmare to put back together again).

Thanks
Jay


PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did exactly that with two CZJ Flektogon 50mm F4 and the end result was excellent.
If the permutation of the elements does not work, you can always revert to the original lenses.


PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I too swapped the front element of a lens with one coming from another copy, and it worked fine.
I wouldn't recommend going much further than that as - since your lenses seem to be working - the risk is to do more damage than good.


PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I made a nice working Oretegor 4/200 from two beat up one's myself
Took the better parts and the better glass..... Works fine....

And i had a professional do the same for another lens.... also works fine.

They have to be the exact same lenses, same generation, same formula....

But i suggest you take your better lens and CLA it yourself or have it done
by a pro according to your preferences... you'll end up with an "as new" lens.


PostPosted: Wed May 28, 2014 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I swapped elements in a Helios 44-2.


PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi !

Thanks a lot for your answers. I did some sesting and appart from "comfort", there is no difference in IQ, so I'll just use the one with the sweetest focus ring and iris.

Cheers
Jay


PostPosted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

See my Post
http://forum.mflenses.com/frankenstein-jupiter8-on-nex-3-t60861.html


PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 3:52 am    Post subject: Thank you for sharing Reply with quote

Thank you for sharing Very Happy


PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a PentaMog - made from a Pentacon 200 / 4 and it's Meyer Optik Gorlitz brother. One of my favourite lenses.


PostPosted: Sat Aug 08, 2015 2:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would expect to have to collimate the lens after swapping elements, since they do vary in thickness. (Controlling the radius of curvature of each side is practical, but making every element the same thickness is much harder.) This is a matter of getting the infinity stop or ship correct for the lens to focus at infinity when set there.

Certainly for some lenses, they will pick sets of elements that are optimal together.

Also, do NOT try this on a rangefinder lens! You will change the focal length, and the rangefinder cam will be wrong. Leica makes focusing mounts (for 50mm) or rangefinder cams (other lenses) for many different ranges of focal lengths for a given lens.