View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:35 am Post subject: Question about the coating of Canon FD S.S.C and FDn |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
As far as I know, in the new FD (FDn) lenses, they're all coated with the same coating as the S.S.C lenses and the red S.S.C was no longer marked. However, some people observed that S.S.C lens coating looks more brown-yellowish and FDn coating looks more blue and that affects the tone of the photos captured by these lenses. So I wonder if the difference was caused by the changing of the coating color through time or they're actually different? (Except the thorium containing FD 35mm f2 which has yellowish coating).
Some FD lenses I have both SSC and FDn versions but they're not with me together so I can't compare them. If someone here ever compared FDn and S.S.C lens pairs, please share with me, I really appreciate that. _________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6000 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
AFAIK these are exactly the same coatings, just that the FDn lenses don't carry the SSC marking on the front.
Of course, there were older Canon FD lenses with a yellowish multi-coating labeled SC, but from SSC onwards - and through the FDn series, they were all the same multi-coating.
Cheers
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014 Posts: 351
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
AFAIK these are exactly the same coatings, just that the FDn lenses don't carry the SSC marking on the front.
Of course, there were older Canon FD lenses with a yellowish multi-coating labeled SC, but from SSC onwards - and through the FDn series, they were all the same multi-coating.
Cheers
OH |
Thank you for your information. This is what I insist while I was discussing with others but I actually saw some SSC lens with more brownish coating so I just hope that someone here has the actual images or experience with these versions to help me figuring out the difference. _________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
Yes, most FDn lenses use SSC coatings, however, these coatings are not just used to reduce glare. They are also part of the method for tuning the spectral transmission. Therefore the colour of the SSC coatings may not necessarily match exactly from lens to lens - some colour variation can be expected.
There at least one non-SSC exception in the FDn line, the 50/1.8 has SC coatings not SSC according to the 1984 edition of Lens Work. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2
Last edited by barryreid on Thu Jul 09, 2015 7:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2015 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
barryreid wrote: |
Yes, most FDn lenses use SSC coatings, however, these coatings are not just used to reduce glare. They are also part of the method for tuning the spectral transmission. Therefore the colour of the SSC coatings may not necessarily match exactly from lens to lens - some colour variation can be expected.
There at least one exception - the FDn 50/1.8 has SC coatings not SSC according to the 1984 edition of Lens Work. |
+1. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeec
Joined: 16 Jun 2013 Posts: 45 Location: Edmonton, Canada
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
eeec wrote:
barryreid wrote: |
There at least one non-SSC exception in the FDn line, the 50/1.8 has SC coatings not SSC |
The FDn 50mm f/2 was the other non-SSC coated lens (it also used the SC coating). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CBokeh
Joined: 15 Oct 2009 Posts: 147 Location: Southern California
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
CBokeh wrote:
eeec wrote: |
barryreid wrote: |
There at least one non-SSC exception in the FDn line, the 50/1.8 has SC coatings not SSC |
The FDn 50mm f/2 was the other non-SSC coated lens (it also used the SC coating). |
I think the 135 f2.5 also falls into that category. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
eeec wrote: |
barryreid wrote: |
There at least one non-SSC exception in the FDn line, the 50/1.8 has SC coatings not SSC |
The FDn 50mm f/2 was the other non-SSC coated lens (it also used the SC coating). |
Wasn't aware of that - the f/2 was quite a let lens with a limited run and isn't listed in my lens work. FWIW It's also the only FDn 50 I never owned over the years. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
CBokeh wrote: |
eeec wrote: |
barryreid wrote: |
There at least one non-SSC exception in the FDn line, the 50/1.8 has SC coatings not SSC |
The FDn 50mm f/2 was the other non-SSC coated lens (it also used the SC coating). |
I think the 135 f2.5 also falls into that category. |
The 135/2.5 was indeed an sc only lens, but it was only ever made in Breechlock, the FDn 135mm lenses (even the f/3.5) were all SSC. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
barryreid
Joined: 27 Aug 2013 Posts: 285 Location: London
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
barryreid wrote:
Just for completeness the only other lens noted as SC in '84 was the 20mm macro photo lens, which is a special bellows only lens so not technically an FDn lens. _________________ Canon + Contax + Minolta + Nikon + Olympus + Pentax + Yashica = Adaptall-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|