View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 11:00 pm Post subject: Carl Zeiss Jena 50mm f2.8 WO. |
|
|
kryss wrote:
_________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1372 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
Kryss,
So beautiful...
What's the lens, a Tessar?
Cheers,
Renato _________________ RSalles BLog: Made in The Wet
http://madeinthewet.blogspot.com.br/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
RSalles wrote: |
Kryss,
So beautiful...
What's the lens, a Tessar?
Cheers,
Renato |
Exactly my thoughts Renato.
Good job Kryss
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
Looks very nice
the name Jena when you are talking LTM, I thought denoted a lens made in the pre-war Jena factory. This lens was made in the Soviet side? Meaning East Germany, 1947 +? _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgustav
Joined: 01 Jun 2014 Posts: 270 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
cgustav wrote:
Nice pics Kryss! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Thank you all,most appreciated.I have to give credit to a6000 though,Whatever lens I mount this sensor does justice to all. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
uhoh7 wrote: |
Looks very nice
the name Jena when you are talking LTM, I thought denoted a lens made in the pre-war Jena factory. This lens was made in the Soviet side? Meaning East Germany, 1947 +? |
The only LTM Jena lenses were made during ww2 as Leitz were unable to keep up with the production numbers required. It was these lenses that the Russians copied to make their LTM Jupiters. All Zeiss did was to remount their Contax lenses into LTM barrels. These wartime LTM Zeiss lenses are rather rare and were often in surprisingly poor quality aluminium barrels.
I'm not sure what the Russians copied to make their Industar 3.5/50. There was a pre-war Zeiss Tessar 3.5/50 for Contax, but the Industar doesn't render at all like that lens so maybe the Industar is a copy of the Leitz Elmar? _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
I think that the industar is not an Elmar but a Tessar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7581 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
The Industar-50 is a tessar(the aperture position is placed between the 2nd element and the 3rd cemented group). It is also mentioned in the archive of KMZ.
http://www.zenitcamera.com/archive/lenses/industar-50.html _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
According to this, the pre-war Industar-10 is a copy of the Elmar but the post-war Industar-22 is a copy of the Tessar:
http://rubicon.egloos.com/5456954 _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
To get back on track..... This is the lens.
_________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Great results Kryss from this lens - indeed.
I have a pre-set version - no Red T - and I don't think that it is as sharp as yours wide open, but it does render very nicely.
This one is with a small extension tube to give the shallow DOF.
Cheers
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kryss
Joined: 13 Sep 2009 Posts: 2169 Location: Canada
Expire: 2017-09-18
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
kryss wrote:
Thanks OH,that is a very nice shot too,I have to put short extension tube on mine if I use it on one of my DSLR's or it hits the mirror. _________________ Do not trust Atoms....they make up everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Great results Kryss from this lens - indeed.
I have a pre-set version - no Red T - and I don't think that it is as sharp as yours wide open, but it does render very nicely.
This one is with a small extension tube to give the shallow DOF.
Cheers
OH
|
Lovely picture. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
kryss wrote: |
Thanks OH,that is a very nice shot too,I have to put short extension tube on mine if I use it on one of my DSLR's or it hits the mirror. |
Mine will operate without the extension ring - but to render the OOF highlights, I had to add it.
Here it is on my X-E1 and the extension ring is between the adapter and the lens.
Cheers
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7581 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
kryss wrote: |
Thanks OH,that is a very nice shot too,I have to put short extension tube on mine if I use it on one of my DSLR's or it hits the mirror. |
Mine will operate without the extension ring - but to render the OOF highlights, I had to add it.
Here it is on my X-E1 and the extension ring is between the adapter and the lens.
Cheers
OH
|
Yours is also T coated even it does not comes with the red T symbol. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
kryss wrote: |
Thanks OH,that is a very nice shot too,I have to put short extension tube on mine if I use it on one of my DSLR's or it hits the mirror. |
Mine will operate without the extension ring - but to render the OOF highlights, I had to add it.
Here it is on my X-E1 and the extension ring is between the adapter and the lens.
Cheers
OH
|
Yours is also T coated even it does not comes with the red T symbol. |
Thanks Calvin.
I thought maybe that it was, as its serial number puts it in the next batch after Kryss' lens (around 1955 I think).
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StillSanj
Joined: 21 Apr 2015 Posts: 412 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
StillSanj wrote:
Very nice. I just got the exact same lens, but the focusing ring is basically immovable. I hope that it just needs some lube because its otherwise in mint . If it works out, I hope my copy is as sharp as yours. I really like the last shot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rudolfkremers
Joined: 10 Jun 2014 Posts: 723 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2015-08-08
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rudolfkremers wrote:
StillSanj wrote: |
Very nice. I just got the exact same lens, but the focusing ring is basically immovable. I hope that it just needs some lube because its otherwise in mint . If it works out, I hope my copy is as sharp as yours. I really like the last shot. |
Are you sure its not a preset ring stopping the movement?
I bought this lens with preset ring as "broken - focus ring stuck" for peanuts, because the seller did not realise its a preset.
You have to pull the preset ring OUT move it you see... _________________ https://www.rudolfkremers.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudolfkremers/
https://www.facebook.com/rudolf.kremers
https://www.omni-labs.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1372 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2015 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
Rudolf,
Just for a matter of curiosity, I had the chance to by last year 2 analog cameras considered broken by the sellers, with the shutter not firing, and all I had to do was replace the batteries,
Cheers,
Renato _________________ RSalles BLog: Made in The Wet
http://madeinthewet.blogspot.com.br/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
With these tessars, You had to push the read pin back in to snack the aperture open?
I remember trying to use it and it was just annoying.. I'm trying to think.. Oh pulling down and selecting the aperture it would stay, but to open it all the way again I could turn the whole thing to the right, but then the aperture wouldn't engage until you pushed the rear M42 pin back in. I think I used to try and 95% turn it around to re-focus etc etc then allowing it to remain "stopped down" ? I couldn't work out a way to keep the M42 pin depressed either as simply holding it in the entire time didn't fix it..
There was an earlier one that came with a Praktica IV, no a FX2 that was half the size and had a "conventional" non-automatic aperture mechanism.
I should have never sold that lens..
Oh, an d yes all the ones I've had had been jammed shut more or less, simply fiddling with them bought them back to life
Last edited by tromboads on Fri Jun 26, 2015 1:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1372 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2015 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
Hi,
I have the same camera model. maybe more beaten then that,but works as intended - M42 mount and I can screw-in many lenses,
There is a loupe inside the "box" shade for the ground glass for better focusing, nice camera,
Cheers,
Renato _________________ RSalles BLog: Made in The Wet
http://madeinthewet.blogspot.com.br/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|