View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
StyxD
Joined: 18 Nov 2014 Posts: 79 Location: Italia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:26 am Post subject: Leica R + Lens Turbo...not working |
|
|
StyxD wrote:
Took a couple of pics early this morning to test my freshly assembled configuration for the Sony A6000:
Leica Summilux-R 50 1.4 E55
+
Leica R to Canon EOS adapter
+
Canon EF to Sony E Lens Turbo mkII
To my biggest surprise (and disappointment), there is no focus at infinite. It felt like using M42 lenses on Nikon body through lensless adpaters, where only macroing was possible.
What am I missing ? I have another Lens Turbo mkII (M42->Sony E) and it works just fine. Is it a problem of the lens ? Or maybe the Leica to Canon adapter ?
I'm waiting for a Nikon to Canon adapter to test my Samyang 85 1.4, will see if that one works. _________________ Powered by Sony A7ii, Canonet QL17 G-III, Konica Hexar RF and:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35 2.4 - Porst 50 1.2 - Canon LTM 50 1.4 - Fujinon 55 2.2 - Topcon 58 1.4 - Leica Summicron-R 90 2.0 - Helios 44M-4 58 2.0 - Konica AE 24 2.8 - Voigtlander Nokton SC 35 1.4 - Leica-R Elmarit 135 2.8 - Leica-R Elmarit 180 2.8 - Jupiter-3 50 1.5 - Jupiter-9 85 2.0
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VLR
Joined: 05 Mar 2015 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
VLR wrote:
I would guess that the R to EOS adapter acts like a spacer, which costs you your infinity focus. If you would use a Lens Turbo for Leica R, this would work. _________________ http://vintagelensreviews.com/
Reviews of vintage Minolta SR mount lenses and more |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StyxD
Joined: 18 Nov 2014 Posts: 79 Location: Italia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
StyxD wrote:
But Leica R needs a spacer to work on Canon EOS, since there is a 3mm difference in terms of flange focal distance (Leica has 47mm while Canon has 44mm).
So there should be no loss of infinity focus. _________________ Powered by Sony A7ii, Canonet QL17 G-III, Konica Hexar RF and:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35 2.4 - Porst 50 1.2 - Canon LTM 50 1.4 - Fujinon 55 2.2 - Topcon 58 1.4 - Leica Summicron-R 90 2.0 - Helios 44M-4 58 2.0 - Konica AE 24 2.8 - Voigtlander Nokton SC 35 1.4 - Leica-R Elmarit 135 2.8 - Leica-R Elmarit 180 2.8 - Jupiter-3 50 1.5 - Jupiter-9 85 2.0
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
It should work...
Have you tested the LT with other lenses for infinity?
My Speed Booster (Leica R) has an adjustment for infinity at the back of the adapter. When it came, new from factory, the infinity was way out with all lenses but after I made the adjustment everything is O.K. now.
Last edited by dan_ on Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StyxD
Joined: 18 Nov 2014 Posts: 79 Location: Italia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
StyxD wrote:
dan_ wrote: |
It should work...
Have you tested the LT with other lenses for infinity?
My Speed Booster (Leica R) has an adjustment for infinity at the back of the adapter. When it came, mew from factory, the infinity was way out with all lenses but after I made the adjustment everything is O.K. now. |
Not yet, I'll test it with a Nikon lens as soon as I get the Nikon->Canon adapter
Could you tell me more abouth that adjustment thing on your adapter ? Perhaps it's just the same as mine. _________________ Powered by Sony A7ii, Canonet QL17 G-III, Konica Hexar RF and:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35 2.4 - Porst 50 1.2 - Canon LTM 50 1.4 - Fujinon 55 2.2 - Topcon 58 1.4 - Leica Summicron-R 90 2.0 - Helios 44M-4 58 2.0 - Konica AE 24 2.8 - Voigtlander Nokton SC 35 1.4 - Leica-R Elmarit 135 2.8 - Leica-R Elmarit 180 2.8 - Jupiter-3 50 1.5 - Jupiter-9 85 2.0
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
It's quite simple.
At the back of the adapter, in the part that enters the camera, is a little screw. If you unscrew it a bit you'll be able to screw and unscrew the entire optical part bringing it closer or further to the sensor till you have spot-on infinity with one of your lenses at maximum aperture. When you're done just screw back that little screw to fix in place the optical part. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StyxD
Joined: 18 Nov 2014 Posts: 79 Location: Italia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
StyxD wrote:
There's no thing like that on mine.
I've read that it could be due to the small protruding flange on the bottom lens, which is the reason why some Leica R lenses hit the mirror on Canon 5D.
I'll be testing. _________________ Powered by Sony A7ii, Canonet QL17 G-III, Konica Hexar RF and:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35 2.4 - Porst 50 1.2 - Canon LTM 50 1.4 - Fujinon 55 2.2 - Topcon 58 1.4 - Leica Summicron-R 90 2.0 - Helios 44M-4 58 2.0 - Konica AE 24 2.8 - Voigtlander Nokton SC 35 1.4 - Leica-R Elmarit 135 2.8 - Leica-R Elmarit 180 2.8 - Jupiter-3 50 1.5 - Jupiter-9 85 2.0
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
My experience is that there should be not problems at all.
DSC_0006 by simbon4o, on Flickr
I have tested 90 2.8 R and Summicron 50 2.0 R - no problems.
PS if there is no infinity the problem should be bad adapter EF-R, if it is fatter than it should be there will be no infinity. LTII is fine even with FD lenses, I have one converted FDn 50 1.4 and tested converted FL 55 1.2 - both have infinity. _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
StyxD
Joined: 18 Nov 2014 Posts: 79 Location: Italia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
StyxD wrote:
That's really interesting.
Could you do me a favor ? I'd like to know where you've purchased your Lr-Eos adapter and also see a pic of the bottom lens of your Summicron - perhaps the flange on the Summilux is more prominent and that could possibly be a reason.
Tomorrow I'll be testing the adapters again with a friend of mine (he's got a Canon).
Thank you ! _________________ Powered by Sony A7ii, Canonet QL17 G-III, Konica Hexar RF and:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35 2.4 - Porst 50 1.2 - Canon LTM 50 1.4 - Fujinon 55 2.2 - Topcon 58 1.4 - Leica Summicron-R 90 2.0 - Helios 44M-4 58 2.0 - Konica AE 24 2.8 - Voigtlander Nokton SC 35 1.4 - Leica-R Elmarit 135 2.8 - Leica-R Elmarit 180 2.8 - Jupiter-3 50 1.5 - Jupiter-9 85 2.0
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2015 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
VLR wrote: |
I would guess that the R to EOS adapter acts like a spacer, which costs you your infinity focus. If you would use a Lens Turbo for Leica R, this would work. |
No, that is not the problem. Adapter stacking is perfectly possible as long as the adapters are precisely crafted.
With an R-EOS-Adapter you turn the R-lens into an EOS-lens. So any EOS-to-somthing adapter should work just with any other EOS lens.
You need to check:
1. Does the R-lens on its own focus to infinity?
2. Does the R-lens with the R-EOS-adapter focus on an EOS cam to infinity?
3. Does any EOS lens with the LensTurbo focus to infinity?
If you can answer all three questions with yes, I guess there must be some minor obstactle which prevent the stack from mounting properly.
I use a PentaxK-FujiX-LensTurbo and I can use stacking (for example with M42 lenses). But I hardly ever do it. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VLR
Joined: 05 Mar 2015 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VLR wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
VLR wrote: |
I would guess that the R to EOS adapter acts like a spacer, which costs you your infinity focus. If you would use a Lens Turbo for Leica R, this would work. |
No, that is not the problem. Adapter stacking is perfectly possible as long as the adapters are precisely crafted.
With an R-EOS-Adapter you turn the R-lens into an EOS-lens. So any EOS-to-somthing adapter should work just with any other EOS lens.
|
I'm with you as long as there is no optics in the light path and only the flange focal distance (FFD) has to be corrected by the adapter. But in this case, one of the adapters contains a lens. Doesn't that pose some kind of a problem when the adapted lenses exit pupil is further away from the adapter optics than a native lens? Could you help me understand why the FFD is the only measure that has to be correct _________________ http://vintagelensreviews.com/
Reviews of vintage Minolta SR mount lenses and more |
|
Back to top |
|
|
meanwhile
Joined: 29 May 2014 Posts: 225 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-11-28
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
meanwhile wrote:
Most likely problem is the adapter. I'd try another one. _________________ In my bag: Sony A7II - Olympus OM 21mm f/3.5 - Minolta M-Rokkor 40mm f/2.0 - Konica Hexanon 57mm f/1.2 AR - Olympus Zuiko OM 100mm f/2.8 - Pentax 135mm f/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Apr 12, 2015 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
VLR wrote: |
LucisPictor wrote: |
VLR wrote: |
I would guess that the R to EOS adapter acts like a spacer, which costs you your infinity focus. If you would use a Lens Turbo for Leica R, this would work. |
No, that is not the problem. Adapter stacking is perfectly possible as long as the adapters are precisely crafted.
With an R-EOS-Adapter you turn the R-lens into an EOS-lens. So any EOS-to-somthing adapter should work just with any other EOS lens.
|
I'm with you as long as there is no optics in the light path and only the flange focal distance (FFD) has to be corrected by the adapter. But in this case, one of the adapters contains a lens. Doesn't that pose some kind of a problem when the adapted lenses exit pupil is further away from the adapter optics than a native lens? Could you help me understand why the FFD is the only measure that has to be correct |
The exit pupil distance doesn't really matter, it's the FFD that matters because it is the distance the lens is designed to focus to(the projected image).
With optics in the adapter, things become much more complicated, the adapter optics must be the correct distance from the sensor, and the lens must be the correct distance from the optics, if either of those are out.... _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|