| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
 Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 8:40 pm Post subject: What is wrong here? |
 |
|
alaios wrote:
Hi, there.
I know that noon light is hard. I also know that forests (anything with shadows and openings).. is a very very harsh lighting environment.
Still when I look on this shot below
there is something else that bothers me, that when I zoom in in the image looks that light does something to the scene elements... Some look over sharpened and other over unsharpened. There is something harsh in each scene element but is very hard to say exactly what that is and what is causing it.
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4741
Location: Cheshire, England
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Its difficult to see anything, the image has been resized and the exif data is missing. Is it from film, digital? can we see close-up samples of the 'problem' areas?
_________________
Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 1:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Shot metered for highlights (or highlight EV lowered in pp) and then LOTS of raised shadows in RAW conversion + noise removal --> shadows have little detail. Pretty much exactly what to expect from that kind of post processing treatment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
Hi,
thanks how I can share the raw file here. I am mostly intresting for learning what I could do better (okay this is a very harsh lighting condition but still good to see where my mistakes are).
Can it also be the reflecting leaves at the ground? Perhaps a polarizer
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
http://regex.info/blog/2011-11-07/1880 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
it looks like hdr, share raw and I am sure that more can be pulled out from the file
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
I hope I am sharing it right
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
hmmm i do not see a link
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
I am sorry
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vpa5b5awd3uinms/_DSC5325.ARW?dl=0 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
well there is something wrong with this file  I have tried not much happened there. Sky is very weird it might be because of the kit lens. It probably would look better in b&w
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 21, 2014 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
Hi,
anyway thanks for trying this. My little knowledge says that this is major a problem coming from the vegetation reflections (as there were humid)
Regards
A |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4741
Location: Cheshire, England
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I cant see a problem with it. Looks fine to me.
_________________
Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7555
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| philslizzy wrote: |
| I cant see a problem with it. Looks fine to me. |
Me too.
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
hmm my eyes see "too much overall reflections everywhere in the scene' and o polarizer could have brought down all this contrastness of the scene |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009
Posts: 5017
Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
| philslizzy wrote: |
| I cant see a problem with it. Looks fine to me. |
Looks OK to me too, maybe a very slight reduction in contrast...but for that lighting condition would think it is what you see with the human eye.
_________________
Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
