| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:08 am Post subject: Mickey mouse scanner |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:08 am Post subject: Mickey mouse scanner |
|
|
alaios wrote:
Hi
I saw today on the internet more mickey mouse film scanners that have their resolution increased. For example this scanner
http://www.pearl.de/a-PX8299-1301.shtml?query=scanner
has a a 14mpixels resolution. I just wonder if these are any better than the typical 5mpixels scanners.
Regards
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 5117
Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
that would be a Mighty Mouse scanner then 
_________________
MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
I think you described it pretty well... perhaps still a scanner outperforms it.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11638
Location: California
Expire: 2027-07-11
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2014 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
My step son brags his tiny 13Mp point & shoot camera has more megapixels than my humongous Canon 5D I at 12Mp. (He also brags about 12X zoom  )
What is the pixel size on these scanners? Bigger pixels are better!
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Solinon 1:5.6/18 ASPH.
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4753
Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
My step son brags his tiny 13Mp point & shoot camera has more megapixels than my humongous Canon 5D I at 12Mp. (He also brags about 12X zoom )
|
You both take the same photo and compare. That will shut him up.
Re the scanner. Ignore the word 'professional' that is just marketing hyperbole. It could be better, but at the price you are getting into flatbed territory, while not as good as a 'proper' neg scanner it ought to do the job better.
_________________
Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
duckrider
Joined: 11 Dec 2013
Posts: 437
Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
duckrider wrote:
aaaaaahm, let say it this way:
The offerer of this item ist not reputated as a highest quality items seller, veeeeeeeery carefully said so. 
do You understand, what I mean?
looking for cheap giimcks? loof at the offerer. 
_________________
T*homas
(from the origin land of Zeiss, an obligation  )
Zeiss ZF 3.5/18, 2.8/25, 2.0/35, 2/50macro, 1.4/50, 1.4/85, 2/100macro
Nikon Df, F2AS, F2A, F3/T, FM
ALPA 11Si, Angulon 2,8/35 ; Xenar 1,9/50 ; Tele-Tessar 4/200
Leica R3 SAFARI Safari Lenses 2.8/28 ; 2/50 ; 4/180
Rolleiflex SL 350 , Zeiss 2,8/16 ; 4/18 ; 2,8/25 ; 2,8/35 ; 1,4/35 ; 1,8/50 ; 2,8/85 ; 1,4/85 ; 4/135 ; 4/200
Leica M9-P, Leica M4-2, Tri-Elmar "Wate", Distagon 2,8/21, Biogon 2,8/28, Biogon 2/35, Planar 2/50, Tessar 4/85, M-Elmar 50mm, Summicron 90
Sony alpha 7r & adapters for all lenses above |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
