View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:15 am Post subject: Old plate camera with digital back? |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I have a very nice plate 9x12 folder equipped with a Schneider Kreuznach Xenar 4.5/135. Following to the lens serial number, it comes form 1928 or 1929.
Strangely, the camera body is no name, with no manufacturer number or markings. People from APUG hinted it could be Welta. Especially looking at big clip standard fixers.
But my question is not about that.
In several forums I saw successful attempts to use such old cameras digitally, with mirrorless cameras attached to their backs, instead of film plate. I am tempted to try it with my NEX. But do not know where to start. Do those of you who did successfully have a how-to step-by-step description? I am especially interested in the following questions:
1. What base or plate did you use to hold your digital camera on the folder's back?
2. What way did you fix the digital mount on the plate?
3. What way you provided correct focusing distance, taking into account that digital sensor schould be put on the focal plane otherwise taken by a film sheet?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012 Posts: 1372 Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
The register distance does not interferes too much as you always can compensate with the bellows moving, but for the god's sake please do not destroy the camera doing this conversion...
[]s,
Cheers,
Renato |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
In no way I am going to destroy the camera. Especially after viewing possbile photo results which are far from being really convincing. Playing with NEX could be an additional option to the camera's original use. Hope the authors of successful experience will give me several hints. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
It will be easier to do this with a 4X5 monorail camera as some gear already exists. There are expensive scanner backs you can use or on eBay there are sliding plate backs with DSLR mounts. However, those sliding backs do not provide full-frame coverage. Also, LF lenses are not anywhere near as sharp as SF and MF lenses on an lp/mm basis. That's because there's less enlargement needed, so 110 lp/mm on an LF lens looks better than 140 lp/mm on an SF lens. So you will have results that, I think, will consistently disappoint you.
Also, old lenses do not have as good a color and contrast transmission profile as modern lenses, so the results will need more post work to avoid them looking very flat.
My suggestion would be to pick up an old monorail camera and use that. It will be easier to do and will be much more durable (due both to age and construction.) With your plate camera, I'd suggest getting some plate holders and using it like it was intended to be used -- with plates. The results, I think, will knock your socks off. Then you can digitize the plates with a macro lens and light source. Here's the process I use: http://youtu.be/ot_vVjlBLmk and it works very well. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
David wrote: |
My suggestion would be to pick up an old monorail camera and use that. |
That is the best advice. On your camera you only have shift movements, no tilt. With a monorail you'll have both and the ability to easier change the lenses.
If you still want to use your camera with a "digital camera back" then the best method to do it is to buy a metal plan-film holder for it and mount your digital camera in the center of the holder. Then take off the ground glass back and replace it with the plan-film holder. This way you won't destroy the old camera. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
On method I have seen is to drill a hole in the back plate of the camera and glue in an adapter e.g. for Sony NEX.
This adapter can be "closed" by a rear cap and thus the camera is still in working order. But you have a pretty huge hole in its back.
Focussing is no problem, as Renato pointed out. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4745 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I did this with an old Icarette. link here: http://forum.mflenses.com/ica-icarette-b-t57273,highlight,%2Bicarette.html
The camera is a rollfilm camera with a removeable back for plates. If you look at the first photo you see how the back is removed.
basically I made a replacement back from a piece of plasticard (modelling plastic available in sheets) about 1.5mm thick. filled down the edges so it would slide into the plate holder.
When that was done I marked the centre and used a hole saw to drill a circular hole in the middle. I attached an M39 NEX adapter (having found where the top was) with plenty of glue.
my camera attaches like this.
I focus using the camera's focusing mechanism. It works well.
The entire job took half an hour or less.
It ought not to take you too long.
I used an M39 adapter because with anything flatter i.e. reversing ring, the grip would have got in the way. The adapter holds it at just the right distance. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
re. getting the focus right, assuming that the bellows can be opened only part way there is no problem; infinity focus will be with the bellows closer to the back than with film (how much closer depends on how far you get the sensor from the back), and extending the bellows more focuses closer.
For the back an easy option would probably be a plate with a hole drilled in the middle, you can the glue a short extension tube (M39 or M42 is very cheap) on the board. No modification of original camera necessary…
I've done a similar modification on a couple of roll film cameras that have a non-opening back and thus include a removable port for cleaning the rear element of the lens. Thus it's a simple matter of attaching said extension tube with double-sided tape:
(Again before anyone misunderstands, this is fully reversible and there is no modification or drilling of the original camera, the hole in the back is there by design.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you so much to all for your contributions! Now I have an idea how to proceed. philslizzy, I will use your technique. Thanks you for precise description.
As for getting quality pictures, I only want to use my camera in a double mode. Acquire another equipment, such as monorail camera goes beyond my intention. Maybe in future.
philslizzy, I saw your samples in the other thread, they are nice and much more convincing that others I saw before.
Arkku, folks, if you have shots from your plate-digital, please post links. I'd really appreciate to see the final result.
Best,
Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4745 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Thanks. Let us know how you get on. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eugen Mezei
Joined: 17 May 2008 Posts: 266
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eugen Mezei wrote:
Slide the matte glass-rear shade assembly out and slide an aluminium plate in to the rails, holding the adaper for your digital camera's bayonet.
As for identification, is nothing embossed in the leather of the camera's handle? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4745 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
The Welta's had a loop stitched to one of the bellows folds which attaches to a small hook on the left of the lens board (as you look at it) Presumably this was to keep the bellows tight when in the infinity position.
I suspect it was a generic camera made for a retailer for example 'Boots Cash Chemist' . They usually had a transfer or sticker attached, which flaked off after about 30 years. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|