View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Karhallarn
Joined: 26 May 2009 Posts: 577
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:32 am Post subject: Which ist the best small 135mm f3.5? |
|
|
Karhallarn wrote:
Hi guys!
I would like to have a 135mm lens for my Samsung NX11. I had the Nikkor-Q 135mm f2.8, which was a very good lens but awefully heavy and huge on this camera.
At the moment I have the 135mm f3.5 Minolta MD my father gave me but I'm disappointed by the imagequality. It's neither sharp nor contrasty.
So, which is the best 135mm f3.5 around! I would like to have a small lens, that is why I'm searching for the 3.5 and not 2.8 Versions!
Cheers,
Karhallarn _________________ www.MoWePhoto.de
Olympus OM-D e-m1 II , Olympus E-5 and NEX 5 and a lot of glas.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mowephoto/?hl=de
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25115960@N08/
500px:
https://500px.com/mowephoto |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
The ebc fujinon T, both in m42 and fujica x mount, is a very good lens, and noticeably smaller and lighter (290 g for the x mount) of all the other 135's I have.
EDIT:
The best overall I tried is the sonnar 135/3.5, but it is much heavier (more than 450g) than the fujinon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:59 am Post subject: Re: Which ist the best small 135mm f3.5? |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Karhallarn wrote: |
Hi guys!
I would like to have a 135mm lens for my Samsung NX11. I had the Nikkor-Q 135mm f2.8, which was a very good lens but awefully heavy and huge on this camera.
At the moment I have the 135mm f3.5 Minolta MD my father gave me but I'm disappointed by the imagequality. It's neither sharp nor contrasty.
So, which is the best 135mm f3.5 around! I would like to have a small lens, that is why I'm searching for the 3.5 and not 2.8 Versions!
Cheers,
Karhallarn |
Very strange. The Minolta MD 135 3.5 is a sharp lens that only needs minor contrast correction. Does your copy have haze? _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
I have a Minolta 135/3.5 and it's both sharp and contrasty. The CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 is indeed much heavier even if it's not that much bigger. In terms of IQ they're equally good (but quite different) but the Minolta is mechanically superior, at least when comparing my copies. Bottom line, I don't think there's anything smaller and better than the Minolta 135/3.5 as long as it's in good condition...
Last edited by miran on Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3460 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Asahi Pentax Takumar SMC 3.5/135. _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
The smallest 135 in my experience is the Jupiter 37A or the newer 37AM. It's a clone of the CZJ Sonnar so the image quality is extremely good, I often winder why it doesn't get more praise here. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5039 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
The smallest 135 in my experience is the Jupiter 37A or the newer 37AM. It's a clone of the CZJ Sonnar so the image quality is extremely good, I often winder why it doesn't get more praise here. |
+1 .. but it is heavy. _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
CZJ Sonnar is probably the sharpest small 135 I have, but I do have a Chinon which is pretty good, with a 2.8 max aperture and even smaller than the Sonnar. The trade off is that the IQ isn't quite as good.
I tried the J37A and whilst it is good, I found it to be a bit, dare I say, boring. It's good, but it's not quite as sharp as a Sonnar and the colours weren't as pleasing. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
miran wrote: |
I have a Minolta 135/3.5 and it's both sharp and contrasty. |
+1. MC/MD 135/3.5 is a wonderful lens, sharp and contrasty wide open. Btw I still have one for sale in almost new condition. However, my version is with 55mm filter thread, which is not super-light. If one looks for small size/weight, then he needs the version with 49mm filters. It is said, however, that 49mm version is less good optically, so I wonder maybe OP has this version.
Btw, if size/weight is your primary concern, don't limit yourself to f3.5 lenses. Hoya HMC 135/f2.8 is ridiculously compact, smaller than many 135/f3.5, beautiful aesthetically and very well built. It's my favorite 135mm. At f2.8 it's a bit low contrast, but already at f4 it matches pretty much any 135mm lens that I have and I have a few very well regarded (e.g. Pentacon or Minolta MD 135/f2.8 4/4 formula). _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Hoya 135 I had was crap, not close to the same level as others being discussed here. Fairly small but quite heavy.
Topcon RE Auto Topcor 3.5/135 is quite small, certainly light and hard to find a better 135mm lens.
Jupiter-11 4/135 is very small and quite light, I've got three copies, 1957, 1958 and 1963, all three are wonderful. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it!
Last edited by iangreenhalgh1 on Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:09 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Karhallarn
Joined: 26 May 2009 Posts: 577
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Karhallarn wrote:
Cheers for all the replies!
I don't have a M42 Adapter at the Moment but I will think about it!
I made a mistake in the post! I don't have the MD 135mm but the MC 135mm QD! Is there a difference in performance between the MD and MC?
Maybe I'm just too picky!
I just took some pictures with the lens and noticed that eventhough the focus indicator on my Samsung says that an image is focused correctly, it is off when viewed later on the computer screen! I don't have this problem with other MF lenses! Any Idea?
When nailed, the lens seems reasonably sharp to my eyes at f3,5 and much better at f5.6.
Here are three images from f3.5 to f5.6 to f8.
Cheers,
Karhallarn _________________ www.MoWePhoto.de
Olympus OM-D e-m1 II , Olympus E-5 and NEX 5 and a lot of glas.
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mowephoto/?hl=de
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/25115960@N08/
500px:
https://500px.com/mowephoto |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Don't forget the Oly Zuiko 3.5/135. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Well, all 135/f3.5 Rokkors prior to MD with 49mm filters use the same 4/4 optical formula. However, the coatings progressed, so MD versions should be a little better. Looks like your problem is not related to the lens though, but rather to focusing/handholding.
Btw,135/f3.5 MD Rokkor with 49mm filters is just 265-285 gram compared to 370-415 gram for QD (depending on generation), so you might want to locate that lens anyway. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shyl
Joined: 22 Jul 2011 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
shyl wrote:
Weltblick 135mm f3.5 is fairly good and small also |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsmlogger
Joined: 14 Apr 2010 Posts: 178 Location: Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
dsmlogger wrote:
I don't think you can go wrong with Olympus Zuiko 135mm f/3.5.
Compact and sharp even wide open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011 Posts: 1246 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
I can lso recomend the jupiter 37a a fantastic lens.
I would also recomend the korean carenar 135f2.8 super light but an excellent performer _________________ My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Don't forget the Oly Zuiko 3.5/135. |
+1.
S. Dynarex 4/135. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Isco Westanar IMO, this lens is tiny and superb
http://forum.mflenses.com/isco-goettingen-tele-westanar-13-5-135mm-m42-t49537,highlight,%2Bwestanar.html _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miran
Joined: 01 Aug 2012 Posts: 1364 Location: Slovenia
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
miran wrote:
eddieitman wrote: |
I would also recomend the korean carenar 135f2.8 super light but an excellent performer |
As always that depends on the actual copy you get. I have this lens and it pretty much sucks in every respect. Or maybe there are several different Carenars 135/2.8, all different but branded the same, I don't know... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eno789
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 159 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eno789 wrote:
I always like the rendering of Konica 135mm f3.2. Not very big or heavy, and inexpensive.
Some wildflower shots
A few more in this album with a tag of "Konica AR 135mm F3.2". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Very nice image. "The" konica 135 mm. Lens to me. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2012 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I've got a 135 lens that I think is a bit of a sleeper, it's a good lens that out of my 6 or 7 135's is my usual 'go to lens' for my NEX.
Fully extended it's 88mm long, and there's a short built in hood. Closed it's a nice compact 77mm. It's 66mm diameter with a 55mm filter and weighs .35kg
My lens is branded Super Paragon, but it's a Cimko and I've seen it under other brand names. It's also f2.8.
It's a damn good lens, if you can find one. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andreq
Joined: 30 May 2011 Posts: 184 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Andreq wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote: |
Asahi Pentax Takumar SMC 3.5/135. |
+1
It's the smallest of my 135mm and it's quite good. _________________ Body : Canon 5d Mark II, Canon 50d
Lenses : Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f1.4 T*, Tamron 17mm f3.5, Rexagon 28mm f2.8, Rikenon 55mm f1.4, Prakticar Pentacon 135mm f2.8, Carl Zeiss Planar 50mm f1.7 T*, Promaster Spectrum7 70-210mm f4, Bell and Howell 28mm f2.8, Yashica Yashinon-DX 50mm f1.4, Nikon Series E 50mm f1.8, Vivitar 90-230mm f4.5 Close Focusing, Super-Takumar 55mm f2, Yashica 75-200mm f4.5 Macro 1:4, Canon "kit lens" 18-55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Another vote here for the CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, wonderful little lens. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007 Posts: 5745 Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2012 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
shyl wrote: |
Weltblick 135mm f3.5 is fairly good and small also |
Yes, it's a OEM version of the Tamron 860, it shows as well under "Sands Hunter" OEM brand, it's preset and weights only 280g.
In fact, I think it's T2 mount but uses to come with a fixed T2-M42 adapter on it.
Jes. _________________ Jesito, Moderator
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|