| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:25 pm Post subject: 35mm F1.7 CCTV |
 |
|
alaios wrote:
Hi,
does anyone have this lens? Should I give it a try? I have seen some fun results but two questions
1. are these predictable in the send to know where and how "distortion" would hit you
2. is the same kind of behaviour something that one can simulate in photoshop?
Regards
A |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wolfhansen
Joined: 06 Oct 2013
Posts: 514
Location: Germany, Ruhr Area
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2014 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wolfhansen wrote:
Here are many sample pics |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vanylapep
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 312
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
vanylapep wrote:
My first MF lens, you should get it, only 35$US so cheap, no matter how it'll perform  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alaios
Joined: 24 Jan 2014
Posts: 724
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alaios wrote:
Hi thanks for the nice answers.
Which focal length do you think I should by for my nex?
I was thinking for the 35
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
what do you have already, what is your interest ? choice of focal length is very subject dependent.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
vanylapep
Joined: 03 Jan 2014
Posts: 312
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vanylapep wrote:
Get the 35mm, i use it on NEX-6. It's really cool for video. I bought the silver version. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 350
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
Mine flares badly, but apart for this , is nice. I also bought a rubber hood, that slightly reduces the flare.
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011
Posts: 2018
Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2014 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
I used a lot on my Nex-3 . That's very far to be a very good lens, but it's fun to use, for a very low price.
It has interesting bokeh, and blury edges.
_________________
Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pd1987
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 74
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pd1987 wrote:
Give 25 and 35 mm a try, but avoid 50 mm. 50 works only when aperture is closed "a bit" to 1.8.
Distortion and blur is rather predictable. With 25 mm be careful with focusing object close to the edge - it might be out of focus...
I presume you can achieve everything in PS, but the question is how much time you'd like to spend on it 
Here you can see all my tests on M4/3 camera - Lumix G2:
http://lenscraze.blogspot.com/search/label/fujian
Personally - I love 25 and 35 mm. I've taken some outdoors wedding shots for befriended couple with 25 and they were amazed. It's definitely fun to use, but it won't work for every task. I treat it as "an effect" lens.
_________________
Samples and subjective tests of manual lenses here:
LensCraze.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rstarphoto
Joined: 07 Feb 2014
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rstarphoto wrote:
I like to use mine in the square format on My Fuji's...I have the black version...
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I have Fujinan branded and yes for 25 USD no brainer to take it, good enough.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pd1987
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 74
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2014 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pd1987 wrote:
| Rstarphoto wrote: |
I like to use mine in the square format on My Fuji's...I have the black version...
|
Oh yes! Those C-mount lenses are perfect for square photos. I've taken some that way and I love that look!
_________________
Samples and subjective tests of manual lenses here:
LensCraze.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Basilisk
Joined: 21 Mar 2013
Posts: 356
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Basilisk wrote:
Looking through that previous thread, I would say that this lens displays strong field curvature. Off centre sharpness is possible, but not at the same time as centre sharpness at the same distance. This could be exploited a bit like a tilt shift lens, i.e. different objects at different distances in focus at the same time. Maybe someone would like to run a test - set the camera up with a fixed focus and move objects in mid frame and off centre around until they are all in focus. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rstarphoto
Joined: 07 Feb 2014
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rstarphoto wrote:
| Basilisk wrote: |
| Looking through that previous thread, I would say that this lens displays strong field curvature. Off centre sharpness is possible, but not at the same time as centre sharpness at the same distance. This could be exploited a bit like a tilt shift lens, i.e. different objects at different distances in focus at the same time. Maybe someone would like to run a test - set the camera up with a fixed focus and move objects in mid frame and off centre around until they are all in focus. |
I think that's why I use the square format. I don't run into that too often as I can off center focus but not get the center oof. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
