View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:08 am Post subject: A Trio of Tokinas |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
OK, it's more like a quartet - but that title doesn't have the same ring to it.
Here are four Tokinas dressed up in Vivitar (3) and Soligor guises.
Respectively they are 105/2.8, 135/2.8, 200/3.5 and 4.5/250mm
Not surprisingly they all render very similarly.
I have listed the images from the 105mm before and they were a delightful surprise to me.
Here are the lenses in question.
and here are a mix of images from them
All shot at open aperture I think
Quite chuffed am I ........
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
#1 is really nice. How the flower stands out from the background
Looks like sharp and contrasty samples _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Nordentro wrote: |
#1 is really nice. How the flower stands out from the background
Looks like sharp and contrasty samples |
Thank you for the kind words.
Not every image is a work of art for sure.
I took these to show off the IQ of these lenses, which is fairly good I think - they have surprised me.
I started with a 105/2.8 and since it was so good, I started looking for other similar Tokinas.
They were all quite cheap lenses, and to me represent excellent value.
Here are a few more images.
They show very little artistic or compositional virtues, but reflect how good these lenses are:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bernhardas
Joined: 01 Jan 2013 Posts: 1432
Expire: 2017-05-23
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
bernhardas wrote:
Edited
Last edited by bernhardas on Mon May 09, 2016 9:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
and fair enough too. Who doesn't like an underdog.
If they give you results like above, well there isn't much to not like really. They look more contrasty then some of the Takumars I've used. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
I detect another T4 fanatic in the making! _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
casualcollector wrote: |
I detect another T4 fanatic in the making! |
Haha - not a fanatic, but I like these examples of the Tokina T4's - the telephotos are fairly simple lens designs.
I would be hesitant about the wide angle T4's as I think that they - being a more complex design - might be showing their age against later wide angle lenses from the same manufacturer. Could be wrong though.
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
invisible
Joined: 06 Jun 2013 Posts: 344
|
Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2014 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
invisible wrote:
I own the 200/3.5 and find that it's a very, very good performer. In time I started using my Vivitar (Kiron) 75-205/3.8 instead because of the flexibility that a zoom gives you, but regardless I think the 200/3.5 outperforms the Vivitar at 200mm in terms of sharpness, bokeh, etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
invisible wrote: |
I own the 200/3.5 and find that it's a very, very good performer. In time I started using my Vivitar (Kiron) 75-205/3.8 instead because of the flexibility that a zoom gives you, but regardless I think the 200/3.5 outperforms the Vivitar at 200mm in terms of sharpness, bokeh, etc. |
Yes, that is probably not surprising.
The prime lenses contemporary with the zooms of the time would have had better IQ, even from the same manufacturer.
I am glad that you enjoy your lenses as I do.
Cheers
OH |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|