MAMIYA 645 Lens, 55mm, 1:2,8

[lowersaxonguy]

MAMIYA 645 Lens, 55mm, 1:2,8 adapted to Olympus pl1, iso 400, handheld

/big_4641_P2213755_1.jpg][/url]


On Panasonic G3 , iso 400, handheld


More pics at (Nex C3): https://secure.flickr.com/photos/mopedfahrer/10815043015/in/photolist-htFZ1b-htFY4w-htFVuT-hqFqhd-hqGAta-kjmafZ-kjmNmv-kjow5j-kjmQAa-kjoyGJ-kjmbUa-kjmMqH-kjovum-kjmMQR-kjoww1-htHgx4-htFYrA-htFWtX-hqGzq8-hqGzP4-hqFPvW-hqFPeJ-hqFNM1-htFUVX-htFXd3-htHeGF-htFXah-hqFNYy/

[flaviomaia]

Seems to be a good performer.
These wide angles for mamiya 645 look a bit off place on small bodies like your pen.
I've used my 45/2.8 on a nikon D80 and even that didin't look very balanced, especially when a regular 35mm format 50/1.4 is smaller and probably sharper.

[lowersaxonguy]

depends on,I throw my 300 and 500 mm lenses on such bodies , no problem. I didnt bought this cams for nice looking on lenses.
I enjoy to take pics. In the other case i had to carry too much wight of FF bodies in my opinion.
I cant talk about sharpness and weight of of nikon 1,4 , dont own one. Please look on my link,some pics there are taken with nex c3 guess they are little bit sharper. Wondering u nikon lens will show more details, less distortion and falloff at 2,8 ?? With the mamiya its easy possible to shift on mft.
The mamiya 55mm weights 255gr.
Nikon 50mm 1,4 280 gr !!!!
Mamiya 45mm 2,8 weights 475gr !!! real wide angels are haevy stuff at medium Format. I woudnt buy them for just playing on mft or aps c.
u are invited to add u best nikon 55 1,4 pic here.
regards