Posted: Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I'm sure you'll find the older 135/3.5 has the edge. The 135/2.5 Takumar bayonet which I had back in the "film era" always seemed to lack brilliance. But digital may do better than Kodachrome with it, so you'll make up your own mind when you get the adapters. That lens was relatively cheap when it was in production, far less costly than the 135/3.5 SMC-M which had a much better - and well deserved - reputation for good image quality. But these days, it seems to sell for three or four times the price of the SMC-M and more than double that of the 135 Super Takumars . . . _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |