View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 9:44 pm Post subject: Which Helios 40? |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
Hello,
I wonder which Helios 40 gives the swirly bokeh? And I also wondering about black or silver? Is there anything that is different if I choose a black or a silver? I have seen some black that looks very new on Ebay, and that Is confusing me cause I thought this lenses were old?
I want to buy one, but I only want a lens that gives that swirly background, and now I wonder if you could help me out here?
Any tip on any good ones on the net?
Kind regards
Tammy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arctures
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 6:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
As far as I know any version - black or silver has excellent swirly bokeh. Black version that looks like new is really new I guess. KMZ factory has been continued lens production since this year. Silver version was produced in the USSR. As far as I know all Helioses differs from each other by sharpness wide open because the quality control issues. So the best way is to get a picture wide open before purchase if possible. _________________ Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2., Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
Arctures wrote: |
As far as I know any version - black or silver has excellent swirly bokeh. Black version that looks like new is really new I guess. KMZ factory has been continued lens production since this year. Silver version was produced in the USSR. As far as I know all Helioses differs from each other by sharpness wide open because the quality control issues. So the best way is to get a picture wide open before purchase if possible. |
--------
Thank you so much for your answer! I think a read here somewhere people discuss if it was a Helios 40 -1 or a Helios 40-2 someone used, cause the person whos asked didn't received the swirly background. Maybe there isn't any different between this two lenses?
Yeah, it would be great if they could say if their lenses gave swirly background, but I guess they would think i'm crazy then Most people don't want that I guess?!
Well, this was difficult, I really don't want a helios if it doesn't gives that lovley , crazy bokeh
Anyway, thanks for your answer!
Kind regards |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
Swirly bokeh is not automatic. I mean, both H-40 have capacity to make this bokeh, but it also depend of the photo (distance from subject + distance from background + light). So, I think it's not that strange to see a photo taken wide open with H-40 without this bokeh.
I'm pretty sure that all H-40 can produce this bokeh. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arctures
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
Tammy, as it was mentioned by BurstMox, bokeh or out of focus area is really not "automatic". That means you really have to learn how to get the best from this lens. So you should go and make plenty of shots in order to achieve the results you want. As far as I know all Helios-40-2 share the same optical schema so they produce the same OOF painting. But how wonderful would your photos be depends solely on you. So be ready to learn how to get the most of your tool. That is true for any lens out there. _________________ Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2., Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Arctures wrote: |
Tammy, as it was mentioned by BurstMox, bokeh or out of focus area is really not "automatic". That means you really have to learn how to get the best from this lens. So you should go and make plenty of shots in order to achieve the results you want. As far as I know all Helios-40-2 share the same optical schema so they produce the same OOF painting. But how wonderful would your photos be depends solely on you. So be ready to learn how to get the most of your tool. That is true for any lens out there. |
+1 swirly bokeh scenes are very limited. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arctures
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
I forgot to mention Helios 40-2 performs (in terms of OOF areas) better on a full frame camera because of wider FOV. So if you are shooting with APS-C or even MFT you may be kinda disappointed. Just go to flickr.com and compare photos from Helios 40-2 + Nex/Pentax/other APS-C with Helios 40-2 + Canon 5D/5D Mark II-III/other FF. You'll see the difference I mean. _________________ Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2., Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lo3ll
Joined: 24 Aug 2012 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lo3ll wrote:
Beside the helios 40, cyclop 85mm 1.5 also does give you the same bokeh!
Cheaper and lighter in weight!
http://imageshack.us/a/img18/640/qa89.jpg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tammyb
Joined: 24 Jun 2012 Posts: 37 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tammyb wrote:
Thanks for all your kind help here!
Is there any different in quality between Helios 40 and cyclop? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lo3ll
Joined: 24 Aug 2012 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 1:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
lo3ll wrote:
Optically helios 40 and cyclop same. But cyclop does not have aperture so it is always at f1.5 and that is why it is lighter and cheaper. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Arctures wrote: |
I forgot to mention Helios 40-2 performs (in terms of OOF areas) better on a full frame camera because of wider FOV. So if you are shooting with APS-C or even MFT you may be kinda disappointed. Just go to flickr.com and compare photos from Helios 40-2 + Nex/Pentax/other APS-C with Helios 40-2 + Canon 5D/5D Mark II-III/other FF. You'll see the difference I mean. |
Very true. Most of the swirly occurs in the outer part of the image circle. FF captures it well, APS-C less well, and 4/3 less yet. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
Actually, not only the Helios-40 in all of its versions, but any Helios lens, just like its German "progenitor", the Biotar series lenses, will give you the swirly bokeh thanks to the optical design of these lenses...
And you certainly can get the effect on crop cameras as well, but there will be less of it (shot with 550D):
One thing that is a required condition for getting this effect is a busy background, something like tree leaves, pebbles, a grassy field, etc.
It also depends on the distance of the subject from the background (like all types of bokeh) . _________________ Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BurstMox
Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 2018 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
I'm not sure if it's totaly related to formula. Naturely, formula is big part of the reason, but I noticed that lastest Helios's (77M4 for exemple) doesn't give easily this type of bokeh. In opposite, Helios 44 give this effect very easily. Maybe the coating have something to do with it, or just the slight changes they may have done from the origial 44 to the last one's. _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|