View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ferrick
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 643 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 12:59 am Post subject: DIY adapted Century 230mm f/3.8 cine lens on K5-IIs |
|
|
ferrick wrote:
It is a c-mount cine lens with a long narrow tube-like rear end. I cut away 2.5cm the rear most part of the lens and inserted it into a M42 focusing helicoid for use on my K5-IIs. It works very well! What's you comment on the performance of this cine lens on APSC sensor?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 4:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Very nice! Crispy with good colors and smooth bokeh. I own two Century telephotos, Tele Athenar II versions, which were intended for 35mm photography. They are both very sharp lenses, so I would expect nothing less from yours. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ferrick
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 643 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
ferrick wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Very nice! Crispy with good colors and smooth bokeh. I own two Century telephotos, Tele Athenar II versions, which were intended for 35mm photography. They are both very sharp lenses, so I would expect nothing less from yours. |
Yes, they are good! I have a Century 6" f/2.8 in c-mount. Will convert it into M42 later and then share photos with forum members.
Below shown how the lens was converted.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ferrick
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 643 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
ferrick wrote:
deleted
Last edited by ferrick on Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
It is a very fine lens indeed, perhaps the sharpest 200mm lens I have.
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=38992&highlight=%2Bcentury&sid=0fb5030108e2ccec4a4639d5ed39c2d9
Mine is a variant of yours, designed an an slr lens because it has a preset aperture. The family resemblance is clear though. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ferrick
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 643 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ferrick wrote:
You got some very nice shots in your post. I particularly like the seagull photo. However, it appears that the front element of your version is scratched or with coating issue . Why that didn't affect the image quality at all ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
ferrick wrote: |
You got some very nice shots in your post. I particularly like the seagull photo. However, it appears that the front element of your version is scratched or with coating issue . Why that didn't affect the image quality at all ? |
Telephoto lenses are usually not affected too much by scratches or coating issues on the front element. I've mentioned this here before, and I'll mention it again briefly -- I used to own a Nikon 180mm f/2.8 ED that had a big chunk taken out of the front element. It was a LOT more than a scratch. It was a gouge. I bought it from a working pro, who claimed to have taken many great photos with it, and the only reason why he was selling it was because he was moving to autofocus. Anyway, because of the front element damage, I bought the lens for very cheap. I loved that lens -- it was one of the sharpest lenses I owned. And I could never see any degradation of images that I'd taken with that lens because of the missing chunk of glass.
A6 Intruder Cockpit -- Note Garfield -- Nikon F2A, AIs 180mm f/2.8 ED, Fujichrome 100.
WWII P47 Ace Paul Conger, same outfit as above, taken circa 1992.
_________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Posts: 251 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mark wrote:
Great colors and bokeh! I loved #5 and #6 images the most! _________________ Latest post on my blog (no new posts):
http://lightbeam-photography.blogspot.hu/2013/10/sword-lilies.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ferrick
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 643 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ferrick wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
ferrick wrote: |
You got some very nice shots in your post. I particularly like the seagull photo. However, it appears that the front element of your version is scratched or with coating issue . Why that didn't affect the image quality at all ? |
Telephoto lenses are usually not affected too much by scratches or coating issues on the front element. I've mentioned this here before, and I'll mention it again briefly -- I used to own a Nikon 180mm f/2.8 ED that had a big chunk taken out of the front element. It was a LOT more than a scratch. It was a gouge. I bought it from a working pro, who claimed to have taken many great photos with it, and the only reason why he was selling it was because he was moving to autofocus. Anyway, because of the front element damage, I bought the lens for very cheap. I loved that lens -- it was one of the sharpest lenses I owned. And I could never see any degradation of images that I'd taken with that lens because of the missing chunk of glass.
A6 Intruder Cockpit -- Note Garfield -- Nikon F2A, AIs 180mm f/2.8 ED, Fujichrome 100.
WWII P47 Ace Paul Conger, same outfit as above, taken circa 1992.
|
Unbelievably sharp ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ferrick
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 643 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Sep 04, 2013 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ferrick wrote:
Mark wrote: |
Great colors and bokeh! I loved #5 and #6 images the most! |
Thank you! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|