View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: Pentax SMC K lenses |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I'm at it again! A couple of nice little parcels arrived today.
#1 Pentax SMC K 3.5/28
#2 Pentax SMC K 1.4/50
I succumbed after seeing hoanpham's and Jeff Zen's great landscapes with the 28. The 50 came mounted on a K2 camera in almost perfect condition, needing only new seals and a good clean.
These lenses are bulkier and heavier than the Takumar and M versions, with 52mm filters. I haven't had a chance to take any pics with them yet. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hoanpham
 Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Congrats.
The K 50/1.4 is a very good build and optical very good. I like it better than M and A 50/1.4.
K 28/3.5 is razor sharp andperfect for landscape. Try f8-f11, on my K5, it is at pixel level. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
estudleon
 Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Well done, Peter!! Enjoy that beauties.
Congrats. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hasan
 Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hasan wrote:
Hello Peter,
grats on the the 28/3.5
According to Yoshihiko Takinami and many others, it is the best among the Pentax 28's:
http://www.takinami.com/yoshihiko/photo/lens_test/pentax_28-30.html
You can find some opinions on Pentax manual lenses here, too:
http://stans-photography.info/
Regards |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Thankyou Rino & hasan
I bought these really for historical reasons as I want to use them primarily on the K2 camera they were designed for, but the chart in hasan's link indicates the K3.5/28 has slightly better resolution than the M version, so on that score I'll probably consider selling my M3.5/28 and M2.8/28 and use it exclusively. I'm not a fan of scientific tests but I need to compare these three 28s before I decide. The 50's are incomparable and need no charts!  _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
robau
Joined: 01 Mar 2012 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
robau wrote:
has anyone tested those against say Hexanons? I´m into some comparisons recently, only Japanese stuff, but lacking Pentax.
Used to own a K 1000 with 2,0/55 years ago, really loved the pics. They had something special, like fine and contrasty. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Drack
 Joined: 27 Feb 2011 Posts: 735 Location: Lithuania
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Drack wrote:
I`m so jealous of the 28...Really want one myself. _________________ I have many great Russian cameras and lenses for sale on my ebay account, please check it out: http://www.ebay.com/sch/piksius/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=25&_trksid=p3686
Forum members are olbigaded to a discount
DSLR: Pentax K-x + 18-55 kit + f4 35-75mm
Mirrorless : Samsung NX-20 + 18-55 kit
M42 lense: Helios 44-2 , Helios 44-3, Helios 44m , Tair 3 Phs , Mir-1B , Jupiter-37a, Industar 50-2, Industar 61 L/Z, Tlear-N .
Currently using:
Minolta X-700 + MD f1.7/50mm + Rokkor-X f2.8/28mm + MD f3.5 35-70mm MACRO
Zorki-4K + J-8 f2/50mm + J-12 f2.8/35mm
EXA 1A + CZJ Tessar f2.8/50mm |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
saffersteve
 Joined: 28 Jun 2011 Posts: 91 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
saffersteve wrote:
Nice! would love a SMC 1.4.
Can't comment on the 28 but this 24 of mine is really nice
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ariban
 Joined: 30 Apr 2012 Posts: 159 Location: Kolkata, India
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: 28mm |
|
|
ariban wrote:
First of all, congrats! Excellent buys and you will enjoy them.
I have two of the 28mm s- the f 2.8 (M) and the f3.5(M).
The 2.8 is a fine lens and is sharp enough. Excellent for streets.
The 3.5 however is just brilliant. Place it at f 5.6 (or a half stop smaller) and you need not bother to focus it!! Nothing could be simpler. Marvelous colors and contrast and excellent colors.
smc Pentax M 28mm f3.5 (wide open)
smc Pentax M 28mm f3.5 (wide open)
All the best with the new lenses.
Arijit _________________ Arijit |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
K 28/3.5 is razor sharp and perfect for landscape. Try f8-f11, on my K5, it is at pixel level. |
I took it away with me on a short holiday to the Isle of Wight, to give it a run. It is certainly sharp and a fantastic lens for landscapes, just what I need it for, and it seems to love working with the NEX-7. These are taken at f8 ISO100 on the Fine (jpg) picture quality setting (3000x1680). No PP whatsoever. Please click for full size versions to see how sharp they really are.
Beach huts at Bembridge
The new Bembridge lifeboat station
Wonderful pics from India, Arijit, thank you for adding them. I love looking at pictures from places I've never visited, I would love to go there one day. Where were they taken? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LucisPictor
 Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Hey, that's a good performer!! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
simbon4o
 Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
Both - great lenses! I like the M 50 1.4 more though for the one idea smoother bokeh. _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Thanks Carsten. I'm delighted with the 28 on the NEX. It seems to give me confidence that the photographs are going to be good no matter what mistakes I make!
simbon4o wrote: |
Both - great lenses! I like the M 50 1.4 more though for the one idea smoother bokeh. |
Well, that lens doesn't have the field of view of the 28!  _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
simbon4o
 Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
simbon4o wrote: |
Both - great lenses! I like the M 50 1.4 more though for the one idea smoother bokeh. |
Well, that lens doesn't have the field of view of the 28!  |
I was talking about the K 50 1.4 and M 50 1.4  _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
simbon4o wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
simbon4o wrote: |
Both - great lenses! I like the M 50 1.4 more though for the one idea smoother bokeh. |
Well, that lens doesn't have the field of view of the 28!  |
I was talking about the K 50 1.4 and M 50 1.4  |
Ah, sorry, I should have realised what you meant. I haven't really tried the K50 properly yet, I find I don't use 50 lenses on APS-C much. I have the Pentax-M 50/1.7 on my ME Super and this one will live on my K2 when it returns from CLA. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hoanpham
 Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Peter, your landscape are sharp and details.
Seems like the nex7 handles this lens very good.
I used to adjust my shots with nex5 with dynamic level 5 to give a kind of weak hdr which should be the base to PP. _________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hifisapi
 Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
Ive had both lenses for several years ( actually I have most of the smc k series ). While the smc k 50/1.4 is really good, the
28/3.5 is truly stellar. Outstanding resolution, contrast, and rendering. I love mine and use it over the F2 version which I also have.  _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peterqd
 Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
hifisapi wrote: |
Ive had both lenses for several years ( actually I have most of the smc k series ). While the smc k 50/1.4 is really good, the
28/3.5 is truly stellar. Outstanding resolution, contrast, and rendering. I love mine and use it over the F2 version which I also have.  |
Thankyou, that's good to know. I was quite surprised when I looked at the range of the K series lenses. I don't remember them very well when they were being produced in the 70s - any new equipment was way beyond my dreams in those days. When I could finally afford to replace my Praktica, the Pentax-M range had been on the market for a few years and I went for an ME Super and skipped over the K range. Now I have the K2 and a couple of K lenses I'm beginning to feel I made a mistake back then. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
simbon4o
 Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
Both 28 3.5(K and M) have this magical aperture F11 where they are really sharp without any CA with great colors and contrast. I had M 28 3.5 but changed it with the M 28 2.8 II because of the sharper center wide open(for macro). _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hifisapi
 Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:49 pm Post subject: I luv the K series |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
hifisapi wrote: |
Ive had both lenses for several years ( actually I have most of the smc k series ). While the smc k 50/1.4 is really good, the
28/3.5 is truly stellar. Outstanding resolution, contrast, and rendering. I love mine and use it over the F2 version which I also have.  |
Thankyou, that's good to know. I was quite surprised when I looked at the range of the K series lenses. I don't remember them very well when they were being produced in the 70s - any new equipment was way beyond my dreams in those days. When I could finally afford to replace my Praktica, the Pentax-M range had been on the market for a few years and I went for an ME Super and skipped over the K range. Now I have the K2 and a couple of K lenses I'm beginning to feel I made a mistake back then. |
I used to be an exclusive Pentax M42 user but later switched to the bayonet lenses. Since the M42 were so superb mechanically I never reallly liked the M or A series as they are mechanically inferior to the K series ( I have a few though). What I did find out in the long run was that not only are the K series mechanically the best, in many cases they are also optically the best probably due to excellent mfg tolerances and quality control of the mid 70's. As such, I now have nearly all of the smc K series and really enjoy using them on my Pentax DSLR  _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ariban
 Joined: 30 Apr 2012 Posts: 159 Location: Kolkata, India
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: Peter |
|
|
ariban wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Wonderful pics from India, Arijit, thank you for adding them. I love looking at pictures from places I've never visited, I would love to go there one day. Where were they taken? |
Thanks Peter. These were from Kolkata- in fact from my neighborhood in the South East Part of the City.
Please do visit India sometime... photographically it will be a feast! Trust me.
regards,
Arijit _________________ Arijit |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mehmetkok
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 22 Location: istanbul-Turkey
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
mehmetkok wrote:
Pentax K-r
Pentax SMC K 135mm F2.5
 _________________ He is a Pentaxian....
Pentax K10D Grand Prix
Pentax SMC K 135mm f2.5
Pentax SMC M 50mm f1.7 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tromboads
 Joined: 29 May 2012 Posts: 1655 Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
Stop its guys.. My Super Tak collection is nearing an end, I don't need to be encouraged to start collecting K glass  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mehmetkok
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 22 Location: istanbul-Turkey
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
mehmetkok wrote:
Pentax K-r
Pentax SMC K 135mm F2.5
 _________________ He is a Pentaxian....
Pentax K10D Grand Prix
Pentax SMC K 135mm f2.5
Pentax SMC M 50mm f1.7 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mehmetkok
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 22 Location: istanbul-Turkey
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
mehmetkok wrote:
We Are The Best ''GALATASARAY''
 _________________ He is a Pentaxian....
Pentax K10D Grand Prix
Pentax SMC K 135mm f2.5
Pentax SMC M 50mm f1.7 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|