View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
konicamera
Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 746 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 8:33 pm Post subject: DYI Shift lens |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone here has any experience with home-brew shift lenses? I've been toying with the idea of making my own shift (not tilt!) lens for a while now. I would like to mount it on a Konica film SLR, which has a very short F/F distance (40.5mm). I thought if I used a third-party 28mm lens made for Nikon (probably the industry's longest F/F distance, with 46.5mm) that would give me room to work out some form of sliding contraption. Of course, the easiest way of getting sch a lens is to buy a T/S Nikkor and mount it using the Nikon to Konica adapter made by Konica. But I am interested in the challenge and saving some $$, as the T/S Nikkors cost an arm and a leg. Any great ideas out there? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier with a medium format lens?
You'd have more margin both for the sliding part, being register distance longer, both for the shift movement, because of the bigger coverage.
A decent medium format lens can cost very little.
No cheap wide angles, though. _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
konicamera
Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 746 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
Aanything wrote: |
Wouldn't it be easier with a medium format lens?
You'd have more margin both for the sliding part, being register distance longer, both for the shift movement, because of the bigger coverage.
A decent medium format lens can cost very little.
No cheap wide angles, though. |
I thought of this and, indeed, I would have much more to work with in terms of F/F distance. But I mostly want such a contraption for architectural photography and was thinking of a 28mm f3.5 lens, or at most a f2.8. The reason for this is that I want a rear optical element of a diameter allowing for as much side travel as possible. I suspect that with a medium format lens that travel would be relatively short. There is also the question of the cost of a 28mm equiv. MF wide angle lens, the matter of size/weight and, of course, the challenge. If at all possible, I would like to stick to 35mm format. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
What a coincidence! Right now I am working at a DIY shift adapter!
But it is not for a SLR camera. It is for using any FF SLR lens as a shift lens on APSC (Sony NEX). It is a half-done work at this moment and in the next days I'll probably make a post about it.
I have adapted a front shift lens standard from an old 6x9 folding camera and transformed it into a shift lens adapter wich can accept different mounts.
Last edited by dan_ on Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:24 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bernhardas
Joined: 01 Jan 2013 Posts: 1432
Expire: 2017-05-23
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
bernhardas wrote:
edited
Last edited by bernhardas on Mon Apr 18, 2016 5:56 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
konicamera
Joined: 03 May 2009 Posts: 746 Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
bernhardas wrote: |
@Konicamera
As written above, you will need a lens that illuminates a larger format, otherwise you will get strong vignetting or dark corners.
For an aps sensor ff gives you some shift but mf will yield distinctly more.
There are also ww zoom lenses that change the circle of illumination while zooming. The largest is always at the highest zoom level.
There are not many manual ww zooms around. The old Nikon Af 18-35 3,5 -4.5 D comes to my mind. At 18 it is a tight ff at 35 a very generous one. |
I didn't think of the vignetting issue. This would seem to imply that 35mm format T/S lenses have an image circle that is much greater than regular 35mm lenses. Is this correct? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Yes. Vignetting is an issue. Like others have said, you'd want a larger format lens for T&S. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
BendyCam, first version:
I have now a 35mm ready to be adapted, but now I'll try on my Pen - there is more room due to short registration distance.
_________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4744 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
enzodm wrote: |
BendyCam, first version:
I have now a 35mm ready to be adapted, but now I'll try on my Pen - there is more room due to short registration distance.
|
how the hell did you get an innertube over those. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NewStuff
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 Posts: 847 Location: Wales, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NewStuff wrote:
I suspect boiling water would be involved. _________________ Too many to list. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enzodm
Joined: 11 Sep 2010 Posts: 350 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
enzodm wrote:
philslizzy wrote: |
how the hell did you get an innertube over those. |
Maybe the size helped. I did not do anything special, except being patient . However, as is it is difficult to avoid vignetting, and I never had time to do something better. The objective is a Tominon 105/4.5 taken from a Polaroid scientific camera. _________________
Canon 60D, Tamron 17-50VC, Canon 55-250IS, Sigma 50-150/2.8 plus:
Wide: Mir 20/3.5, Kenlock 24/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Yashikor 35/2.8, Mir 37/2.8
Fifties: Voigtländer Color Ultron 50/1.8, Pentacon 50/1.8, Zenitar 50/1.9, Leica Summicron 50/2, CZJ Pancolar 50/2, CZJ Tessar 50/2.8, Industar 50/3.5 , Rikenon 55/1.4, Petri 55/1.8, Helios 58/2
In the middle: Cyclop 85/1.5, Nikon 100/2.8
135s: Tamron 135/2.5, CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5, Jupiter 135/3.5, CZJ Triotar 135/4, Tamron Twin Tele 135-225
Tele: Soligor 200/2.8, Pentax Super Takumar 200/4, Hanimex 400/6.3, Makinon 500/8
Various: Schneider-Kreuznach Componar 135/4.5, Tominon 105/4.5, Vest Pocket Kodak meniscus, Wray Supar 2"/4.5
Sony Nex 6 plus:
Industar 69 28/2.8, Fujian 35/1.7, Rokkor 50/1.4, Jupiter 50/2, Cosmicar 50/2.8, Industar-22 50/3.5, Leitz Elmar 90/4, Canon Serenar 100/4
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Inventive, but that is a tilt lens, not a shift one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kendo1
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 171 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kendo1 wrote:
Have you checked out the pic of my Granddad's camera?
Note the front mounting, it looks quite easy to replicate for a shift lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|