View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:02 pm Post subject: Auto Revuenon 55/1.4 |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
I won this item at 12,50 euros (but has to pay 18 euros shipping costs! )
My question: are all 55mm Revuenons made by Tomioka, or did they buy them from various manufacturers? _________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Not sure, perhaps come from different manufacturers. Good news is I never heard bad things about this lens. Can you show me a picture ? _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Tomioka was a manufacturer , but also a design office ! Probably other lens mfg's made this lens under other brands ... I'm quite sure cosina and sun/sigma group made it, with tomioka drawings ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I'd say that 55/1.4 Tomiokas with metal focusing ring are optically slightly better (sharper), than the with rubber ring. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Perhaps they are come from different manufacturers. I had metal version of this lens. Good one, but Nikkors are better and CZ , Olympus also. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
Here´s some pictures of the lens:
eBay pictures, not very clear.
Can you say something by the serial number? _________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I am, pretty sure this is not made by Tomioka unfortunately.This is looks to me a made by an unknown manufacturer who is made Praktica lens also.
Let we see what is other members opinion. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xpres
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 964 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-10-28
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Xpres wrote:
Looks a bit like my cosinon 55/1.4. Very nice from 2.8 but very soft wide open. _________________ Film... and sometimes SD14, 5D2 and some other suff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gurdie
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 997 Location: Finland
Expire: 2013-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gurdie wrote:
Thanks, guys.
I have to wait the lens to arrive, and send some pics then. _________________ Markku
Give me two hours a day of activity, and I'll take the other twenty-two in dreams.
― Salvador Dali
----------------------------------------- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I know about 5 versions:
- the pictured one
- rubber ring, O - shaped surface
- rubber ring, III - shaped surface
- metalic ring, III - shaped surface
- leather-like ring
- multi-coated (blue letters)
#2 is probably the most common, prone to iris failure
#4 is realy very sharp (I'd say the copy I had was slightly sharper than all #2 I've tested), seems to be a HQ build
#5 is sometimes referred as Tomioka original, rare, I've never tested this version, but I'd expect good build and optical quality
#6 rare, I've seen it only once on ebay (but there ar MC Cosinons and Porsts based on the same optical design) _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Case from Holland
Joined: 26 May 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Amsterdam, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Case from Holland wrote:
[quote="no-X"]I know about 5 versions:
- the pictured one
- rubber ring, O - shaped surface
- rubber ring, III - shaped surface
- metalic ring, III - shaped surface
- leather-like ring
- multi-coated (blue letters)
#5 is sometimes referred as Tomioka original, rare, I've never tested this version, but I'd expect good build and optical quality
Some time ago i had a version 5, optical good but build quality lousy.
Much play in de rear part which resulted often in images with either left of right side unsharp.
I sent it to a guy in Lituania for glass parts.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
I got a similar lens too a while ago. The aperture is stuck at 1.4, so I could only try it out wide open.
No PP, only RAW to jpg coverted, from D90.
In ViewNX's once magnified it didn't seem less sharp than my Nikon 50/2 Ai stopped down to 2.8. Unfortunately jpg conversion kills the effect. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3702 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Gurdie wrote: |
Here´s some pictures of the lens:
eBay pictures, not very clear.
Can you say something by the serial number? |
This is CHINON made lens body.
@Lena: Show us more photos please. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
I didn't cope too well with the small DOF, but these seem more or less in focus.
No PP either.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1839 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
I hate to start up an old thread again, but it seemed logical to put my question here.
According to the list from no-X above, i have been offered a version 2, and it has stuck aperture blades. Now my question is: is this the version that is soft wide-open? And is it repairable or not? I must add that i have recently repaired a Rikenon 1.4/55 with loose aperture blades with succes, but this is obviously another lens... (b.t.w.: the Rikenon is sharp wide-open.)
Serial number starts with 20xxx , if that means anything.
Thank you!!
_________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
izvar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 Posts: 252 Location: Moldova
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
izvar wrote:
Same lens. Wide open. CHINON branded.
UPDATED:
Mine is exactly like this one:
http://forum.mflenses.com/auto-chinon-mulitcoated-55-1-4-first-pictures-t25175.html _________________ “The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat.”
― Confucius
Last edited by izvar on Fri Apr 05, 2013 4:08 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
TrueLoveOne wrote: |
I hate to start up an old thread again, but it seemed logical to put my question here.
According to the list from no-X above, i have been offered a version 2, and it has stuck aperture blades. Now my question is: is this the version that is soft wide-open? And is it repairable or not? |
First of all, all of these lenses are soft(ish) wide open. It's not b "bug", it's a "feature"
Your lens is most probably repairable. You will approach it from the front (don't touch anything on the rear). Focus the lens to minimum focusing distance. Note the 3 screws around the front barrel. Unscrew these 3 grub screws. Unscrew the front barrel.
Now, depending on which exact lens you have, you may be able to simply pull the entire optical assembly with your fingers - or you may have to unscrew (with a spanner wrench) a retention ring, after which you will be able to pull the entire optical assembly with your fingers . Unscrew front and rear lens groups (if possible; in one case I was unable to unscrew the rear group, and had to do everything from the front).
If you were able to unscrew both groups of glass, you can then simply soak the remaining diaphragm assembly in isopropyl alcohol or Zippo fluid (the latter works better), move and clean the blades. If not, you will have to disassemble the aperture mechanism, remove and clean the blades and other moving parts. I've done it, and it's rather simple compared to other lenses. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012 Posts: 1839 Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
Okay !! Thanks a lot... sounds a bit like it's constructed the same way as my Rikenon 1.4/55. I thought it would be completely different, because it's the version with the rubber with the O-shaped grips on it.
I'll give it a try then! _________________ My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2013 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
A lot of Japanese lenses are similar to a point just short of identical in construction. The M-42 normals especially so. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|