Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Here's a pic of this lens:
Compared to most other fast 35mm-40mm lenses I tried it's already sharp wide open imho
It's simply not as good as it's ultra-good Biogon 28/2.8 brother which causes "bad" reputations
Bokeh at wide apertures is really busy indeed, but I like it anyway for most situations
I really loved it optically but sold it due bad haptics
Here some more sample shots, mostly wide open, some F2.8
Here's a 100% crop - wide open according to the crappy bokeh and thin DOF! Who says it's soft wide open?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/54671350@N02/6890416938/sizes/o/in/photostream/
_________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |