View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 3:42 am Post subject: Suggestion for high end tripod ball head |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I have a very sturdy Gitzo carbon tripod to which I have attached a Benro B-4 ball head. The Benro looked very good and it was much cheaper than brands like RRS or Novoflex etc. I am however disappointed in the Benro, especially with heavy lenses. When I turn the knob to lock the ball head after framing, there is a significant give and the result is that the framing is off. In order to frame properly I have to frame high and try to anicipate the amount of movement after I lock the ball head.
I am now prepared to pay for quality. I need something that will hold even my 600/5.6 Nikkor which is 2.7Kg. I appreciate that there always will be some play with a lens this heavy, but with the Benro I experience a lot of play even with much smaller lenses. Which ball head would you recommend? _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7555 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 5:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
I do not see many people here use ball head for 600mm lens here. A ball head for super tele lens like this http://reallyrightstuff.com/ProductDesc.aspx?code=BH-55-LR&type=3&eq=&desc=BH-55-LR%3a-Full-sized-ballhead-with-LR&key=it will be too heavy for daily use with normal or short tele photo. It will also be hard to operate with such heavy and long lens. Go for a gimbal head like this http://www.tripodhead.com/products/wimberley-main.cfm if you want a head for exclusive use on tripod or something like this http://acratech.net/product.php?productid=10&cat=1&page=1 if you want to use it on both tripod and monopod.
Some here should have a better idea on this topic as my experience is limited to 500mm Mirror lens. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
My Manfrotto 498RCZ is a similar spec and price to the Benro and it does the same thing, it moves when you clamp it tight. It's ok for short lenses but not for long. So I hardly use it, instead I use a Manfrotto 804RC2 pan / tilt head which is much easier and more accurate to use. I prefer pan & tilt now that I use this head more.
But I think a geared head is probably the best option for long lenses, or a gimbal. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
I'm not a ball head fan myself; I do prefer geared or two-way heads when it comes to heavy/long lens combos.
Having said that, should you insist in using the ball head concept with a heavy/long tele, I'd guess your best option would be a FOBA Superball, it's a rock-solid performer with up to 15kg capacity. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
I have a large no-name ball head that came attached to a Bogen tripod I bought second hand. It locks down even a fairly heavy camera/lens combo securely, but even it has some give before it finally comes to a rest. I also have a Benbo (related to the Benro?) tripod with ball head that locks down fairly well, but not as securely as this big no-name one. Anyway, I've just come to regard the sag as a "feature" when using ball heads. I have five different ones in various sizes, and they all do it.
Honestly, I prefer using a more traditional head style with a big and heavy camera lens combo, like what you'll have with a 600/4 with camera attached. Takes a lot of the headache out of framing a subject. What I often do, though, if I' stuck with using a heavy setup with my Bogen with ball head is I will adjust the legs, pulling one or more in slightly to correct the framing. Pulling a leg in raises that trisectional area of the frame. (Can't really call it a "quadrant") _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
You should buy a gimbal head.
They start at around $150. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Himself
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3242 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
If you really want to go with a high end ball head then try an Arca Cube.
_________________ Moderator Himself |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Thanks for your replies and suggestions!
If I could find an Arca Cube head at 50% off, I might actually consider it
I'm looking for a "do it all" head which means that a gimbal head is out of the question. After all, I rarely use my longer lenses but when I do, it has to be sturdy.
I have been eyeing the high end ballheads and will continue reading reviews. What has cought my attention though is the Manfrott/Bogen 405 with Arca Swiss type plate adapter. Not as fast to use as a ballhead but it should take the weight just fine and allows easy adjustment after locking the head. Hmm... _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Excuse me for commandeering your thread Pontus.
My cheap camera tripod is useless with long lenses - even using a remote release causes vibrations. I also have a really
heavy duty tripod designed to be used with surveying instruments, in my case my theo, I'd love to be able to mount a
standard camera head on it. However the screw thread is 5/8" diameter Whitworth and I can't find a head with a thread that
large, they're all 1/4" and 3/8". I could possibly make an adapter myself using a 5/8" tap and a 1/4" die, but it's a lot of
hassle without a proper workshop.
Any suggestions?
That Wimberley head looks fabulous Calvin, a bit too expensive for me though! _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SVP
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 665 Location: Greece
Expire: 2017-12-17
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
SVP wrote:
@peterqd: Is the 5/8" Whitworth identical to the audio (mic stand) 5/8"-27 one?
If yes, there exist readily available 3/8" male to 5/8" female adapters. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10983 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
One with a big (more gripping area), hollow (lightweight), ball, would fulfill design needs.
My cheap Slik has 4cm solid ball -- not too heavy; enough support, in a pinch, for 3.5kg 500/4, though not optimal for moon shots, but plenty sturdy for lenses I use most, to 300/4. I usually use a different type head (and tripod) with the longest lenses. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
One with a big (more gripping area), hollow (lightweight), ball, would fulfill design needs.
My cheap Slik has 4cm solid ball -- not too heavy; enough support, in a pinch, for 3.5kg 500/4, though not optimal for moon shots, but plenty sturdy for lenses I use most, to 300/4. I usually use a different type head (and tripod) with the longest lenses. |
The Benro B4 that I have has a ball diameter of 64mm and it is rated for a maximum of 40Kg load. But it's not good enough for me.
Good specifications and nice looking but it doesn't work for me. I don't think I would be satisfied with another cheap alternative either. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
SVP wrote: |
@peterqd: Is the 5/8" Whitworth identical to the audio (mic stand) 5/8"-27 one?
If yes, there exist readily available 3/8" male to 5/8" female adapters. |
Actually I've discovered the survey tripod thread is 5/8" UNC (C for coarse), not Whitworth, but they are virtually identical.
They are both much coarser thread than on mic stands - 11 threads per inch compared to 27 tpi. I found the mic stand
adapters Click here to see on Ebay you mean - they're almost exactly what I need, but as you can see in the pictures, the
5/8" female thread is too fine.
Anyway, thanks for your help! _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1441 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
I've read a lot of good things about the relatively new Photo Clam ballheads. Might be worth a look.
reallybigcameras.com _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
SVP wrote: |
@peterqd: Is the 5/8" Whitworth identical to the audio (mic stand) 5/8"-27 one?
If yes, there exist readily available 3/8" male to 5/8" female adapters. |
Actually I've discovered the survey tripod thread is 5/8" UNC (C for coarse), not Whitworth, but they are virtually identical.
They are both much coarser thread than on mic stands - 11 threads per inch compared to 27 tpi. I found the mic stand
adapters Click here to see on Ebay you mean - they're almost exactly what I need, but as you can see in the pictures, the
5/8" female thread is too fine.
Anyway, thanks for your help! |
the UNC and Whit' threads are close enough to fit with no trouble at all. I have taps and dies in my workshop so I'll make an adapter for you the next time I can clear the junk from around my lathe. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
SVP wrote: |
@peterqd: Is the 5/8" Whitworth identical to the audio (mic stand) 5/8"-27 one?
If yes, there exist readily available 3/8" male to 5/8" female adapters. |
Actually I've discovered the survey tripod thread is 5/8" UNC (C for coarse), not Whitworth, but they are virtually identical.
They are both much coarser thread than on mic stands - 11 threads per inch compared to 27 tpi. I found the mic stand
adapters Click here to see on Ebay you mean - they're almost exactly what I need, but as you can see in the pictures, the
5/8" female thread is too fine.
Anyway, thanks for your help! |
the UNC and Whit' threads are close enough to fit with no trouble at all. I have taps and dies in my workshop so I'll make an adapter for you the next time I can clear the junk from around my lathe. |
That's a fabulous offer Dave, thank you very much indeed!
There's an important thing to know before you do anything - the tripod screw is fitted in a slot in a loose bar, and the top
plate has a hole about 50mm dia. in the centre. This allows for sliding the theodolite around on the plate to achieve
perfect plumb over a point on the ground. The adapter would need to span across this hole onto the plate, so about
100mm long. Also the thread on the screw is about 12mm long, so the "adapter" needs to be at least that deep, so I was
anticipating using a 1" x 1/2" brass bar 4" long or thereabouts. Here's a pic of a tripod plate like mine - I'll measure it
more precisely and PM you the dimensions.
Thanks again!
_________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|