| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:12 pm Post subject: pentacon 50mm F1.8 |
 |
|
nurkov wrote:
Taken with Canon 7D and pentacon 50mm F1.8 [M42] at F2.8
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1372
Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
Nurkov,
I have the same lens but can't go so close, what did you use for macro?
[]s,
Renato |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
with this picture nothing it's naked glass and full frame no crop, this lens has quite close focus of 0.33 m. Maybe it depends on a version mine is Pentacon auto 1.8/50 Multi Coating. It looks like that:
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Yebisu
Joined: 13 Feb 2011
Posts: 1299
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yebisu wrote:
Looks good to me. It does focus close for a 50, doesn't it?
_________________
If you have time, please check out my photography blog from Japan. http://monkeybrainsushi.wordpress.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RSalles
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1372
Location: Brazil - RS / South
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RSalles wrote:
Took some shots, and barely as close as yours but wait: the last Canon i had was also a 7D and the crop factor was 1.6... Or, otherwise you shoot a giant flower. 
I'll download the images i took later and post here. The M42 copy i have here is almost the same as yours, i own also 2 more in PB mount, which i'll try also for the near-macro-hidden function,
[]s,
Renato |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
here is the same flower taken from 1.8m witk mitakon 135mm F2.8 so you can get a scale of it 
And yes as for the 50mm is focusing really close, really nice and under rated lens.
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user
Last edited by nurkov on Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nurkov
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 711
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-03-09
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nurkov wrote:
On the other hand when you use macro tubes you get something like that, taken at F11 with pentacon full frame no crop
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/34787419@N08/
Minolta and Canon user |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4744
Location: Cheshire, England
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I'm gonna have to dust mine off and give it a serious blast.
_________________
Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 1655
Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
+1 for the pentacon. I've got a couple in different guises and they are all great. but shhh not so loudly.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
