| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:55 am Post subject: Rodenstock-Ysaron 90mm f/4.5 |
 |
|
pdccameras wrote:
With an enlarging lens like this 90mm f/4.5 Rodenstock-Ysaron - who needs a Trioplan? 
All shots wide open on the A7.
P.
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 983
Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 2:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mir wrote:
The second one is truly marvelous....
Maybe i should give some of my enlarger lenses a go....
_________________
"Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, 1.5/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7584
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Nice photos. A Rodenstock Trinar should be better for bokeh photos.
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
| Mir wrote: |
The second one is truly marvelous....
Maybe i should give some of my enlarger lenses a go.... |
Thanks for the compliment!
Absolutely give them a try - its lots of fun, the IQ is generally high, and it forces you to take a slightly different approach to your photography. Mounting is usually pretty straight forward, since many of these optics have standard M39 X 1 (LTM) screw mounts - just screw on an LTM -> M42 adapter ring Click here to see on Ebay
and then screw the lens into an M42 helicoid tube or M42 bellows designed for your camera and you are off and running.
Best,
P.
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| Nice photos. A Rodenstock Trinar should be better for bokeh photos. |
Thanks, Cal - I'll give one of those a shot!
Paul
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
I like all of them.
Sharp with the beautiful bubble bokeh.
Great images and not as easy as you make them look.
Thank you.
OH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
!Karen
Joined: 20 Jul 2013
Posts: 836
Location: Belgium Baby
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
!Karen wrote:
Those photo's are beautiful, great bokeh!
_________________
FLICKR PHOTOSTREAM |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
serkol
Joined: 26 Aug 2012
Posts: 926
Location: Belarus
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
serkol wrote:
Intresting and nice photo! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Posts: 2587
Location: Indonesia
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
lovely pictures. I wonder what is difference this lens with Rogonar 90/4,5
_________________
nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TrueLoveOne
Joined: 30 Sep 2012
Posts: 1839
Location: Netherlands
Expire: 2013-12-24
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
TrueLoveOne wrote:
Lovely images! Experimenting with lenses is a great way to spend your free time! 
_________________
My Flickr photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/chantalrene/
Sony A7, Canon 5D mkII, Minolta 7D + RD3000 and some more.....
Minolta and Konica collector.... slowly selling all the other stuff! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 5:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
the problem with enlarging lenses is that most of them only have a few blades. So if you need some DOF
and stop them down a little you get ugly bokeh.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr G
Joined: 27 Jan 2014
Posts: 187
Location: London & Essex
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr G wrote:
I have an older version of that lens knocking about in my darkroom, will have to dig it out and gaive it a go!, nice pictures by the way.
_________________
EVEN A BLIND SQUIRREL FINDS A NUT NOW AND THEN! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7584
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| hifisapi wrote: |
the problem with enlarging lenses is that most of them only have a few blades. So if you need some DOF
and stop them down a little you get ugly bokeh. |
Yes. Most modern enlargers are with few blades. The old ones does have lots of blades.
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 941
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| hifisapi wrote: |
the problem with enlarging lenses is that most of them only have a few blades. So if you need some DOF
and stop them down a little you get ugly bokeh. |
Yes. Most modern enlargers are with few blades. The old ones does have lots of blades. |
It has little to do with age. Enlarging lenses only have to deal with flat field, not 3-d subjects
so bokeh is not an issue and there is no need for multiple blades.
_________________
===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7584
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| hifisapi wrote: |
| calvin83 wrote: |
| hifisapi wrote: |
the problem with enlarging lenses is that most of them only have a few blades. So if you need some DOF
and stop them down a little you get ugly bokeh. |
Yes. Most modern enlargers are with few blades. The old ones does have lots of blades. |
It has little to do with age. Enlarging lenses only have to deal with flat field, not 3-d subjects
so bokeh is not an issue and there is no need for multiple blades. |
The reason of having less blades is to reduce the manufacturing cost.
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010
Posts: 1258
Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
So who else checked out the Ebay prices on Ysarons after seeing the pics?
_________________
I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
Thanks all.
It is definitely a good idea to shoot for older versions of enlarging lenses to get a high number of diaphragm blades. I have a cheap plastic Isco enlarging lens with a square (4 blades) aperture! I will have to shoot a few pics with that one just for the fun of it.
I did have little extra time the last few days, and blooms in the garden coincided with a string of nice weather, so it has been a the perfect opportunity for messing around with some goofball lenses!
Best,
Paul
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pdccameras
Joined: 23 Aug 2009
Posts: 825
Location: Putnam, CT
Expire: 2014-08-11
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2014 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pdccameras wrote:
By the way, if you are on the hunt for one of these, I think the Rodenstock Omegaron (branded for Omega enlargers) is the same lens!
Paul
_________________
Canon 5D Mii, Canon 40D, Canon 350D IR, Sony A7 Mii, Sony Alpha-6000, a ton of lenses: AF & MF and too many cameras to count, all formats: 110 - 4x5. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
