| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:35 pm Post subject: New(old) lens! CZJ Pancolar 1.8/50 |
 |
|
uddhava wrote:
I am slowly increasing my lens collection by adding CZJ lenses as advised by other members here. I don't have so much money so I try to find a bargain or reasonably priced lens. This one I got for $32 which is not too bad, however the aperture was stuck when I bought it.
I cleaned the blades off and it worked for a while, but now it is sticking again(it won't close all of the way) and I notice oil left on the blades or reappearing. Maybe I will need to clean it a few times.
I took some test shots and it seems okay besides the above problem.
Please comment.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
Last edited by uddhava on Tue Sep 04, 2018 3:57 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Does it seem like a good copy?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 8979
Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
I only have the 2/50 pancolar, and your images remind me of its ability to reproduce nice color especially the blue skies. What do you think of your lens do you like it?
_________________
Moira, Moderator 
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 3461
Location: Northern Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
On my monitor it looks good to me. 
_________________
"I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
| mo wrote: |
| I only have the 2/50 pancolar, and your images remind me of its ability to reproduce nice color especially the blue skies. What do you think of your lens do you like it? |
Yes, and I think you are correct the colors(including the sky as you mention) are looking good. I like the look of the lens, it focuses
smoothly and the aperture clicks nicely except it doesn't close all of the way. I cleaned the blades and it worked properly for a while,
but now it is sticking again and I am seeing more oil on the blades. perhaps I need to clean it a few times or have it cleaned at the shop.
I like that it opens to 1.8 since my eyes aren't what they used to be.
Thanks for the comment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
eddieitman
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 1246
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
eddieitman wrote:
The lens looks like it performs really well and is infact a good copy,
Take a look at the 2nd picture the level of detail in the branches for the corner, I have one and i had to clean mine several times before it worked correctly.
$32 is an excellent price as well these are going for a lot more normally
_________________
My web site www.digital-darkroom.weebly.com
Life is like a camera. Focus on what's important, capture the good times, develop from the negatives and if things don't work out, just take another shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
| DigiChromeEd wrote: |
| On my monitor it looks good to me. |
Great! Glad to hear it. I am new so it's good to get the opinions of the more experienced. Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
| eddieitman wrote: |
The lens looks like it performs really well and is infact a good copy,
Take a look at the 2nd picture the level of detail in the branches for the corner, I have one and i had to clean mine several times before it worked correctly.
$32 is an excellent price as well these are going for a lot more normally |
Okay, thanks. And what you are saying will help me to determine if a certain lens is good.
Nice to have some sunshine during the long winter. actually I am not originally from Hungary, but from Southern California so I am missing the sun. Besides that I can not see so well to focus when it is cloudy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
izvar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 252
Location: Moldova
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
izvar wrote:
I tried three copies of CZJ 50/1.8 Pancolar MC. Two were MC in white and a third one was red MC. I noticed that wide open the red MC is the sharpest one and with better microcontrast. That was just my experience. And after all, I sold the white ones and I left with none (cause the red MC was not mine)
Conclusion: do not make comparisons with lenses, which not are yours ))
Let's guess - your copy is zebra one(not MC)
_________________
“The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat.”
― Confucius |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012
Posts: 3072
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
| izvar wrote: |
I tried three copies of CZJ 50/1.8 Pancolar MC. Two were MC in white and a third one was red MC. I noticed that wide open the red MC is the sharpest one and with better microcontrast. That was just my experience. And after all, I sold the white ones and I left with none (cause the red MC was not mine)
Conclusion: do not make comparisons with lenses, which not are yours ))
Let's guess - your copy is zebra one(not MC) |
Your correct! It is the zebra. How did you know that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
izvar
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Posts: 252
Location: Moldova
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
izvar wrote:
I felt that because I have other zebras from CZJ
Less contrast and some vintage rendering...
_________________
“The hardest thing of all is to find a black cat in a dark room, especially if there is no cat.”
― Confucius |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
