View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pe1ihu
Joined: 23 Dec 2012 Posts: 5 Location: Wilp Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:43 pm Post subject: Auto Chinon 300mm 1:4,5 |
|
|
pe1ihu wrote:
I recently purchased an Auto Chinon 300mm 1:4.5 serial 101028 for 45 USD
Filter = 67mm , rear = M42 + mechanical switch "auto-manuel"
8 aperture blades
I have a few photos taken with my Canon 550d
Tree at f4,5 1/25 sec ISO 200
Tree at f8 1/8 sec ISO 200
Tree at f22 1 sec ISO 200
Birdcage at f4,5 1/12 sec ISO 800 new foto
Birdcage at f8 1/4 sec ISO 800 new foto
Birdcage at f22 2 sec ISO 800 new foto
Some pictures of te lens
Last edited by pe1ihu on Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:39 am; edited 5 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:44 pm Post subject: Re: Auto Chinon 300mm 1:4,5 |
|
|
Attila wrote:
pe1ihu wrote: |
I recently purchased an Auto Chinon 300mm 1:4,5 for 45 USD
I have a few photos taken with my Canon 550d
|
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
How have you found it? I had a Sankor 300/4.5 but it gave horrible purple fringing. Looks like your Chinon copes much better. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Fix color, contrast with a few clicks and looks she will be a good lens , congrats! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pe1ihu
Joined: 23 Dec 2012 Posts: 5 Location: Wilp Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pe1ihu wrote:
Found it on "Marktplaats" the Dutch ebay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
The first set of photos look ok, but the second set of the bird-box look, to be frank, terrible.
Hopefully it's just mis-focus but I'm not sure. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
SonicScot wrote: |
The first set of photos look ok, but the second set of the bird-box look, to be frank, terrible.
Hopefully it's just mis-focus but I'm not sure. |
Yes, the birdhouse looks out of focus until the F22 shot. _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7794 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Can we see a picture of the lens? I'd like to compare it to my Chinon 300 / 5.6 _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pe1ihu
Joined: 23 Dec 2012 Posts: 5 Location: Wilp Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
pe1ihu wrote:
I added some lens details and pictures in my first post |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Looks soft & CA issues wide open, but not bad at F8. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pe1ihu
Joined: 23 Dec 2012 Posts: 5 Location: Wilp Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
pe1ihu wrote:
SonicScot wrote: |
The first set of photos look ok, but the second set of the bird-box look, to be frank, terrible.
Hopefully it's just mis-focus but I'm not sure. |
I made some new Pictures focusing on tree trunk (previous bird hole)
There is a strange white mist in the lower part of the picture at f4.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
pe1ihu wrote: |
SonicScot wrote: |
The first set of photos look ok, but the second set of the bird-box look, to be frank, terrible.
Hopefully it's just mis-focus but I'm not sure. |
I made some new Pictures focusing on tree trunk (previous bird hole)
There is a strange white mist in the lower part of the picture at f4.5 |
Reading the details I see you have some very slow shutter speeds, this indicates you are using a tripod (or similar) to get the shots. Assuming that to be the case, why are some of the shots at ISO 800? Surely using a tripod gives you the opportunity to use the lowest ISO possible (for cleaner photos).
With the new photos you added, the lens should be optimal around f8 (probably) but it's still not looking great, to be honest. Not the worst I've seen but if it were me, I'd be looking for a better lens in this focal length.
As for the 'white mist' it looks like a lack of contrast, not uncommon from a cheaper lens wide open. Could also be you were shooting more towards the sun than away from it. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Posts: 390 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
Well, it is not horrible but I think one old Tair 3s will kick it's ass. It doesn't look sharp or CA free... Still nice for the money! _________________ 10-300мм 4.0 - 1.2 - 4.5 NIKON&Sony bodies / Sony 10-18, Pentax 28 2.8 II, CZJ 35 2.4, Nikkor DX 35 1.8, Samyang 35 1.4, KMZ 50 1.7, FDn 50 1.2 L, Nikkor 55 2.8, Rokkor 58 1.2, Soligor 85 1.8 Preset, Samyang 85 1.4, Canon FDn 85 1.2 L, Tokina AT-X 90 2.5, Canon FDn 135mm 2.0, Nikkor 180 2.8 ED, Tair 300 4.5
________
snimo.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pe1ihu
Joined: 23 Dec 2012 Posts: 5 Location: Wilp Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pe1ihu wrote:
SonicScot wrote: |
pe1ihu wrote: |
SonicScot wrote: |
The first set of photos look ok, but the second set of the bird-box look, to be frank, terrible.
Hopefully it's just mis-focus but I'm not sure. |
I made some new Pictures focusing on tree trunk (previous bird hole)
There is a strange white mist in the lower part of the picture at f4.5 |
Reading the details I see you have some very slow shutter speeds, this indicates you are using a tripod (or similar) to get the shots. Assuming that to be the case, why are some of the shots at ISO 800? Surely using a tripod gives you the opportunity to use the lowest ISO possible (for cleaner photos).
With the new photos you added, the lens should be optimal around f8 (probably) but it's still not looking great, to be honest. Not the worst I've seen but if it were me, I'd be looking for a better lens in this focal length.
As for the 'white mist' it looks like a lack of contrast, not uncommon from a cheaper lens wide open. Could also be you were shooting more towards the sun than away from it. |
I'm also not satisfied with the lens
Due to bad weather I have taken the pictures from a tripot with high iso values from under the porch
I had expected better images, better than my Canon EF-S 70-300 kit lens
maybe I should look for a tair _________________ Love to use old cheap MF lenses, Sigma 24/2.8, Yashica 35/2.8, Nikkor 135/2.8, Kenlock 135/2.8, Chinon 300/4.5 Greetz , Alex |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2012 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
A Tair-3 would be an excellent choice, I have one and it's a really fantastic lens.
If you're patient you might find one for as little as £30-£40 in great condition _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
buerokratiehasser
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 470
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
buerokratiehasser wrote:
Mine is silver and labelled Universar, but the design seems to be the same
Can you pull out a lens hood?
Stopped down to f8 or f10 it's good for what I call "iso 250". (on old Sony 10Mpix ccd aps-c sensor)
It gives purple-green-bokeh and a "seeping low contrast" look so I suspected Sun lens (Dimension/Universar/Chinon... there were some big threads about those including 135 and 200/3.5) even without seeing the design. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|