View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: Tokina 300mm f/6.3 Reflex Macro |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
Given my interest in mirror lenses, getting this one was just a matter of when. I received it last week, took it out this weekend, and I am very happy with its performance. Finding worthy subjects was more challenging.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8065375363
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8065376094
For those looking for a quality mirror lens, this is it. Thanks Tokina! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
are those crops or original size photos? _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
WolverineX wrote: |
are those crops or original size photos? |
They are not cropped. This lens focuses down to 80cm, so it offers up to 1:2 magnification - this is what justifies the macro denomination. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
nice. that's that new mirror for m43? _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
Very interesting, what's the MFD? Looks like a great bug-hunter. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
fuzzywuzzy wrote: |
Very interesting, what's the MFD? |
80cm. I reviewed it here. I took more shots recently - I will upload them over the next few weeks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
Here are a couple more samples. First one was shot at over 7 miles distance and I converted it to B&W because colors were faint due to haze.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8181271690
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8181271642 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GaborF
Joined: 06 Nov 2012 Posts: 35
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GaborF wrote:
Very interesting bokeh - looks unique on the "cactus" picture! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
GaborF wrote: |
Very interesting bokeh - looks unique on the "cactus" picture! |
'unique' is one word to describe it, 'drunk' is another _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
GaborF wrote: |
Very interesting bokeh - looks unique on the "cactus" picture! |
It's what you can get when the background is busy and too close to the foreground. Lots of small donuts there.
Here's one more set:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8184011067
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8184010997
http://www.flickr.com/photos/laurentiucristofor/8184047218 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
nice results. the bokeh is a little funky, but thats to be expected with a mirror. _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
Excellent images! They make me want to buy this lens. I am however worried about just how sharp this lens really is. A lot of the reviews I've seen tend to criticise it rather a lot. The resolution test below is taken from this review. The measure the resolution at something like 800 LW/PH
Comparing with their review of the Panasonic 100-300mm lens, the measure the central resolution to be about 1200 LW/PH (falling to the level of the Tokina mirror at the edges).
On that basis, the Tokina can hardly be considered "razor sharp". I too would like to see full size versions of some of your images to better judge the real sharpness.
Mark _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
SXR_Mark wrote: |
Excellent images! |
Thanks.
SXR_Mark wrote: |
They make me want to buy this lens. I am however worried about just how sharp this lens really is. |
I had seen that review before and I thought that the Tokina fared well in that comparison of 100% crops with the 75-300. Most differences there could come from shooting the Tokina at a higher ISO - note that the background is noisier. That kind of differences would require very large prints to notice. In the end, I think your choice will be determined more by whether you want a zoom, AF, and no donuts than by the relative sharpness. The images from mirror lenses sharpen very well so with a little PP you will get similar performance from a smaller package.
Here's an unprocessed 100% crop from the first image I posted, where I used a tripod:
And here's an unprocessed 100% crop from a handheld portrait:
There is plenty of detail to work with in these. The main challenge will be to use this lens to its full potential because 300mm is very tricky to handhold on MFT. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
@ Laurentiu Cristofor
Thank you for posting the crops. I agree with your assessment of the merits of this lens. I have several mirror lenses and they can never quite match the ultimate sharpness of a good refractor, but in the real world sharpness is limited by handling and precise focusing. In skilled hands (like yours!) remarkable results are possible. I think the fact the Tokina has a chip that triggers the auto-magnification on the camera will be a real asset in getting correct focus.
Also, the B&W set is great. Who would have thought a 300mm lens could be so versatile!
Mark _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 524 Location: WA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
SXR_Mark wrote: |
Thank you for posting the crops. I agree with your assessment of the merits of this lens. I have several mirror lenses and they can never quite match the ultimate sharpness of a good refractor, but in the real world sharpness is limited by handling and precise focusing. In skilled hands (like yours!) remarkable results are possible. I think the fact the Tokina has a chip that triggers the auto-magnification on the camera will be a real asset in getting correct focus.
Also, the B&W set is great. Who would have thought a 300mm lens could be so versatile!
|
You're welcome and thank you for your kind words. One thing that I like about mirror lenses is that they don't have much of a problem with CA - this is the part that worries me a bit about the refractor designs. The price is good too. And I like that this Tokina focuses close - the zooms focus down to only 1.5m.
About the chip - I found out that I actually prefer to trigger the magnification myself - just got used to it and I don't have to wonder about how much it would stay on. Might come in handy sometime, but for now I turned the feature off. I do like that I get EXIF information recorded - not that it changes much between shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|