View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 Posts: 1761 Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:37 pm Post subject: Kodak Retinette Ia Camera |
|
|
LittleAlex wrote:
Very pretty camera with incredibly good Reomar 2.8 45mm lens from Schneider. I believe it is one of lanthanum triplet lenses. There are test pictures which I took to explore the lens possibilities. The film was FUJICOLOR SUPERIA 100
_________________ "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Indeed excellent, I hear first time this lens , thanks! Can you include a picture from camera itself, to inform people better. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 Posts: 1761 Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LittleAlex wrote:
Attila wrote: |
ICan you include a picture from camera itself, to inform people better. |
Attila wrote: |
I hear first time this lens. |
I bought it only because it was very chip (something around $12), and very pretty in the perfect condition (completely like on the above picture). However later I discovered, that it is not only very beautiful toy, but also the perfect picture taker.
For example, there is the open (2.8 ) lens:
Not so bad for the triplet lens, isn’t it? _________________ "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Wrong triplet are myth , usually come from wrong set of camera or low quality maker, I did try numerous triplet all was good as more element lenses if they did come from famous makers like yours. One of my best triplet experience is Novar from Carl Zeiss in Ikonta M folder. I see no difference vs Zeiss Tessars. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
LittleAlex
Joined: 27 Nov 2008 Posts: 1761 Location: L'vov (Western Ukraine)
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LittleAlex wrote:
Attila wrote: |
W low quality maker, . |
Surprisingly, to make the good tessar is much easier then the good triplet. So, the good triplet needs really the very competent producer. _________________ "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept" - © H. Cartier Bresson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Nice samples, the Reomar is a good lens, as is the Radionar it replaced. I think the Reomar is, as you say with Lanthanum, like Voigtlander and Kodak, after ww2 Schneider redesigned their triplets to use the new lanthanum glasses.
I agree with Attila, there are plenty of good triplets, I have excellent Schneider Radionar, Voigtlander Voigtar Zeiss Ikon Novar and Meyer Trioplan equipped cameras. I think the crappy triplets are the ones from the cheap makers like Staeble-Kata, Roeschlein Kreuznach, Enna etc. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|