Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Leidolf Lordon 1,9/50mm VNEX
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:59 am    Post subject: Leidolf Lordon 1,9/50mm VNEX Reply with quote

...it was grey and rainy this weekend ... only a few shots ...


f5,6

#1

#2


f1,9

#3

#4


PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, it looks okay at 5.6 but at 1.9 it's awful. Sad Of course, poor light doesn't help.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Hmm, it looks okay at 5.6 but at 1.9 it's awful. Sad Of course, poor light doesn't help.

+1 one of the forgettable camera, many thanks to sharing them.


PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

+1
Do you have a picture of the lens ?


PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Olivier wrote:
+1
Do you have a picture of the lens ?


Olivier, here is a picture:




The Lordonar and Lordon were manufactured by Enna Munic you can read here:

http://www.designundphoto.de/seite%20ca0160%20leidolf%20lordomat%20.htm


Gerhard


PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Danke sehr, Gerhard.


PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a very pretty camera, shame about the lens.

What mount does this camera have?


PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1, it is special unique Lordomat-mount.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am reluctant to believe samples show even average performance this lens can offer. I am on the mission to put you wrong Wink.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The old Enna lenses are only of the level of iq that gewa shows, the ones they made for Corfield and Argus are also bad.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The subjects are very important too. The Nª 3 is a good one. Pictorial looked (in one of the some styles) is a good way to emphatize some of the character of the lens.

The last two don't add nothing to benefict the lens, I guess.

Perhaps a single portrait could add something positive.

Of course all is IMHO.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here are some more pictures all shot with f1,9.


#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

O, this is much better. It certainly has Enna signature. Lovely bokeh and enough detail. Thank you for posting.


PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pancolart wrote:
O, this is much better. It certainly has Enna signature. Lovely bokeh and enough detail. Thank you for posting.


+1 so much better ! Light is key factor always, based on these pictures , first series has probably focusing error too.