View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MMouse
 Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:21 pm Post subject: Great bright 55/58mm for reasonable money |
|
|
MMouse wrote:
Hello,
I had previously a great Voigtlander 58mm f/1,4.
Apart from chromatic aberrations with the A7, it is an superb lens and I enjoyed it.
Now I'm missing a good 55 to 58mm lens that could be a standard on the A7 and a 85mm on APS-C.
I need something bright, but I'm afraid f/1,2 lens will be almost as expensive as the Voigt so f/1,4 may be fine.
I look for decent sharpness wide open and not too distracting bokeh.
I have had a few 50mm lenses and that was the main point, sometimes beautiful bokeh but too much character for my liking.
For example my Minolta MC PG 50mm f/1,4 is sharp but I find it's bokeh on APS-C too harsh and it sometimes glow strangely on full frame. I think the Voigt had much smoother blur than the 50's I own.
Do you know a lens that could remplace the Voigt for significantly less money ?
I think I can spend about $200 if necessary.
Above that, I'll probably wait and buy another since I know it's a great lens.
Thank you for your advices. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3025 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
You can usually pick up a Canon FD 58 1.2 or even a 55 1.2 for around that sum. Either one is reasonably sharp at 1.4 and beyond.... _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
papasito
 Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1688
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
If don't matter to you the CA, the MC 1,2/58 is a real great lens |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1N0
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2566
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
You should be able to pick of one of the Tomioka 55mm F1.4's (many brands) for around $50 _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lightshow
 Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
papasito wrote: |
If don't matter to you the CA, the MC 1,2/58 is a real great lens |
The Rokkor 58/1.2 is normally over $300, any less, and I would look extra hard for issues, like chips or scratches, or bad mods, as many have been hacked to mount on EF... Which should have been a non destructive mod. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luisalegria
 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
How sharp is sharp?
Or sharp enough?
Thats very subjective.
As d1n0 says, there are tons of very similar and very cheap 7-element 55/1.4's around, actual makers uncertain, from the late 1960's-80's. All heavy metal things. Maybe they have too much character but thats also subjective. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MMouse
 Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
MMouse wrote:
Thank you.
Did a few more researches and went on Flickr to see samples.
Some old lenses seems to be quite sharp with nice colors, but I don't like their bokeh that much. f/1,2 lenses are too expensive. I don't mind disturbing bokeh for f/1,8 lenses, but I want a smooth bokeh lens.
I'll probably wait until I could find a new Voigt. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
y
 Joined: 11 Aug 2013 Posts: 311 Location: EU
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
y wrote:
The 55-58s are great. Most of them come from early 60s which implies not so great sharpness but great bokeh.
Topcon RE. Auto-Topcor 58/1.4 - an excellent lens with excellent bokeh at f/1.4-f/2. My personal fav. A limited edition of Voigtlander 58mm f/1,4 was modeled after this lens.
Konica Hexanon AR 57/1.4 - very nice bokeh for not much money |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MMouse
 Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
MMouse wrote:
Thank you.
Topcor looks quite similar to the Voigt but it's rare in Europe and not that cheap.
Minolta MC 58mm 1.4 and Konica 57mm 1.4 are probably among the best bokeh lenses in that period, but well I'm not 100% convinced. Looks very good on some shots but not what I'll call smooth. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sciolist
 Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
MMouse wrote: |
… I don't mind disturbing bokeh for f/1,8 lenses, but I want a smooth bokeh lens.
I'll probably wait until I could find a new Voigt. |
How about a cheap and cheery double-gauss then? You could look at a Pentax M 50 1.7 while you look for a Voigt. If it has a particular characteristic, as well as being double-gauss, it is that it produces quite a modern render for an old lens. To my eyes at least. One of my favourite lenses, unless I want heaps of character. As I say, it provides for a pretty clean, modern looking image. Sold by the cart load, hence low prices. It is a 50 however, and not a 55/58.
Speaking of double-gauss, my own personal favourite for bokeh is my common semi-auto Carl Zeiss Biotar 58 f/2. But that might be too slow for you. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cooltouch
 Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Jamaeolus's recommendation of the Canon FD 55mm f/1.2 is a lens I can heartily recommend. If you're patient and you shop around, you should be able to find a nice copy for under $200. I know this to be true because I bought one for substantially less than $200.
Another lens to consider is the Canon FL 55mm f/1.2. It can usually be found for quite a bit less than the FD version. A significant fact to keep in mind is that the optical formula of the two lenses is identical. There is a difference in coatings and obviously a difference in the mounts, but using the lenses on a Sony mirrorless, this mount difference isn't going to matter.
I've done comparisons between my FD and FL 55mms and I can't tell a difference between the two under normally lit, bright sun conditions, so I don't think the coating differences are a very big deal, to be honest. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/
Last edited by cooltouch on Sat Nov 10, 2018 1:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
D1N0
 Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2566
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
MMouse wrote: |
Thank you.
Did a few more researches and went on Flickr to see samples.
Some old lenses seems to be quite sharp with nice colors, but I don't like their bokeh that much. f/1,2 lenses are too expensive. I don't mind disturbing bokeh for f/1,8 lenses, but I want a smooth bokeh lens.
I'll probably wait until I could find a new Voigt. |
If you want a smooth Bokeh lens you might consider a 50 1.4 like the Super-(Multi-Coated) Takumar 50mm f1.4. Tomioka bokeh tends to be more wonky (depending on what's in the back ground and how far away it is). _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemark
 Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4297 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
I have quite a few lenses in that range. Some of them i have been comparing here:
http://artaphot.ch/systemuebergreifend/objektive/477-standard-lens-bokeh-i
Among them, i would recommend the following:
* Minolta MC-II 1.4/58mm (sharper than the MC-I version); it is in fact more a 60mm lens, and it has a nice bokeh. Quite cheap (in the 50 USD range). Its bokeh is even slightly smoother that that of the FD 1.2/55mm (look at the link above)!!
* Konica AR 1.4/57mm: quite similar to the Minolta MC 1.4/58. Very cheap, often considerably below USD 50.--
* Minolta MC 1.2/58mm (in fact about 60mm): considerably smoother bokeh than the FD 1.2/55mm, slightly smoother than FL 1.2/58mm.
All these lenses have a much smoother bokeh than the corresponding 1.2 and 1.4/50mm lenses. For the bokeh, the longer focal length (about 60mm real focal length) is more important than the optical construction.
http://artaphot.ch/systemuebergreifend/objektive/479-standard-lens-bokeh-ii
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sciolist
 Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
If you want a smooth Bokeh lens you might consider a 50 1.4 like the Super-(Multi-Coated) Takumar 50mm f1.4. Tomioka bokeh tends to be more wonky (depending on what's in the back ground and how far away it is). |
Yep. Double-gauss again.
EDIT: It's a Planar. Apologies.
Last edited by Sciolist on Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
KEO
 Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 781 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
I have one of the Konica Hexanon 57mm f/1.4s, and I would say it has smooth bokeh. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99
 Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
50/1.4 Takumar? Considerably cheaper than your budget and a good enough lens on my 5D mkii. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MMouse
 Joined: 18 Apr 2018 Posts: 58
|
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MMouse wrote:
Thank you.
I think the Voigt will be my own Christmas present. Unless I found a great gem, may happen, I don't know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|