View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 6:43 pm Post subject: Strange M39 and infinity focus issue... |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
Got 2 fine lenses a few days ago - a 1960 red 'n" Jupiter-9 lens, and on '0xx' Helios-44 lens, which I assume is also from that era.
Both are silver, both are SLR versions, and both are of the M39 mount.
Here is the ebay listing of the Jupiter-9, so you can see the version.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/390455075272?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
Now, I also own a very nice '00x' Tair-11 133 f/2.8 lens, which is also silver, has a red 'n', and is of the M39 mount.
To use those, I got my self an M39 -> canon EOS adapter (I have the canon 550D camera).
All 3 lenses mount just fine.
When I got the lenses, I checked them at home, and I was in a kind of hurry, so I shot a few pics, nothing serious.
The other day, I was shooting some portraits, and was stunned to discover that both lenses cannot focus beyond maybe 6 or 8 meters!
The ring shows 10 meters, 20 meters, 25 meters, and infinity, but the lens would not focus...
Read some stuff about this issue here and on other sites, and learned that sometimes the adapter is to blame, as it blocks the lens going the whole way to infinity...
So, I decided to "trick" it, and mounted the lenses on my camera using an M39 -> M42 adapter ring, and then using the M42 -> EOS adapter.
It worked on the Helios-44!
When mounted through the ring, it focuses perfectly from MFD to infinity.
The Jupiter-9 still does not, when mounted this way, for some reason.
The Tair-11, on the other hand, focuses from MFD to infinity just fine with the M39 -> EOS adapter I have.
Any thoughts on this issue? any solutions you know of? _________________ Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
looks like that jupiter 9 is adapted from some other mount _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Well, it looks like your m39-Eos adapter is a tad too long. 135mm are often calibrated to focus past infinity to allow for thermal expansion, so your Tair can work with this adapter.
M39 register is 45.2, compared to M42 register of 45.46. It appears that you J-9 is calibrated too precisely for infinity, consequently it sits 0.26 mm too far to reach infinity on m42 adapter. The solution is too disassemble J-9 and adjust infinity, which is done by taking out some shims. See guide here, it's for Kiev rf version, but m39 should be similar. http://www3.telus.net/public/rpnchbck/Jupiter-9%20dismantle.html
EDIT. After seeing Wolverine's post and looking at your auction, I agree with Wolverine. This looks like amateur adaptation, probably poorly adjusted for infinity. Probably the solution is to sand/file the mount plate, assuming the lens has register close to SLR M39 mount. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
i must correct myself. it is m39 but rangefinder version, so it won't focus to infinity on dSLRs , only on mirrorless cams
look at the Attila's post in this thread
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=26305&start=15 _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
Wait, how can it focus at all until ~20 meters if it's the RF version?
Also, seller wrote that it is the SLR version... it's a big seller, which I don't suspect of cheating.
Looked at attila's thread... how can I tell if it is the RF or SLR 1960 M39 version?
The things described in the guide are too complicated for me to do.
Is there any easier solution, or should I try and return the lens to the seller and get a refund? _________________ Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
Misha_M wrote: |
Looked at attila's thread... how can I tell if it is the RF or SLR 1960 M39 version?
|
slr m39 version is shorter than RF version
RF version is one on the left, and slr version is in the middle
_________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
Does it mean that the SLR version will? If you mount the lens using an M39 -> M42 adapter and then M42 -> camera mount with glass? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
m39 SLR version should focus to infinity on dSLR _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
It's very obvious non-factory conversion of RF lens to SLR M39. if that was true LTM, it wouldn't focus to 20m on m42 adapter. Focusing 85mm lens to 20m means only 0.36mm extension. I would just grind off M39->EOS adapter a little. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dimitrygo
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 561
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dimitrygo wrote:
Your lens fucuses in the opposite direction and the mount looks very strange. I think this is either some Frankenstein lens or some unknown variant of Jupiter 9 poorly adapted to M39. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
It's possible that it was put together wrong after an inexperienced person tried to service it.
My first few reassembly attempts had small errors that put the helicoid in the wrong position and therefor at the wrong distance to the sensor/film plane. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
enliten
Joined: 20 Sep 2011 Posts: 201 Location: Perth, WA
Expire: 2014-07-03
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 6:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
enliten wrote:
ooh! exciting!
Quote: |
RF version is one on the left, and slr version is in the middle |
I bought mine thinking that it was the RF version, I was wondering why it got so close to infinity on my canon... I may have to mess with some shims myself
-Ben _________________ www.craftedbyben.com
Digital: Canon EOS 7D
Film SLRs: Zenit 122, Nikon F55, Nikon FM2, Pentax Spotmatic, Pentax ME Super, Pentax K1000, Minolta SR1
Rangefinders: Konica Auto S2, Zeiss Ikon Contessa LKE, Zeiss Ikon Continette, Zeiss Ikon Ikonta 521/16, Fed 5B
50's: Super Takumar 50 f1.4, Helios 44-m6,, Minolta MD 50 f1.4, Meyer Optik Oreston 50 f1.8, Olympus 50 f1.4, Industar 55 f2.8 (RF), Jupiter-3 50 f1.5 (RF), Yashinon DS 50 f1.4, Zeiss Jena 50 f2.8, Zeiss Pancolar 50 f1.8
Med Tele: Jupiter-11 135 f4 (RF), Mamiya 120 f4 Macro (645), Meyer Optik Trioplan 100 f2.8, Jupiter-9 85 f2
Tele: Jupiter-21a 200mm f4
Wide: Rikenon 35 2.8, Rikenon 28 f2.8, Minolta MD 28 f2.8, Minolta MD 24 f2.8, Pentacon 30 f3.5, Enna Werk Munchen Lithagon 35 f4.5
Autofocus: Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 50 1.4, Tokina 11-16 2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
Lena wrote: |
Does it mean that the SLR version will? If you mount the lens using an M39 -> M42 adapter and then M42 -> camera mount with glass? |
I think it should work; like I wrote in the original message, I also got a Helios-44 M39 version, which was also said to be for zenit SLR, and when I mounted it using M39 -> M42 ring -> M42 to canon EOS adapter, it worked just fine.
fermy wrote: |
It's very obvious non-factory conversion of RF lens to SLR M39. if that was true LTM, it wouldn't focus to 20m on m42 adapter. Focusing 85mm lens to 20m means only 0.36mm extension. I would just grind off M39->EOS adapter a little. |
It doesn't focus at 20 meters, or at 10 meters, or at any distance beyond ~6 meters (haven't measured it exactly with tape, but it could not focus correctly at a window of a neighboring house, which is a few meters away...) .
Update:
It really is the RF version!
Checked it in the most reliable way; mounted it on an old film zenit-E camera using the ring adapter, and it still doesn't focus beyond ~6 meters...
So, is there a way of servicing an RF lens to become an SLR lens, or should I try to return it and get a refund, or sell it?
P.S:
About M39 to EOS adapters in general, does anybody know an adapter brand that is thin enough to allow correct infinity focusing when mounting directly with it? or is it easy do fix the adapter, and can be done at home by a non professional? _________________ Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|