View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JWH
Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:32 pm Post subject: A New Arrival, Jupiter 6-2 180/2,8 - with some questions. |
|
|
JWH wrote:
Came across this one on the dutch ebay-like equivalent and could get it for a very reasonable prize, compared to the ebay listings on this item.
It arrived earlier today and that box was way heavier than I expected! Whilst unpacking it revealed the fully silver Jupiter 6-2 which was so cold that I could barely even hold it! It's quite cold these days here in the Netherlands. First thing that struck me was the size, it is enormous!
I also ordered a M39-EOS adapter as I thought I would need it for this one. Seeing it was silver I automatically assumed it was the M39 version of this lens. However the M39 adapter didn't fit and it fitted nicely in a normal M42 adapter. Then I also noticed the Serial being 004049.
Could this be a rare bird? It's hard to find info on this thing on the web.
Also the focus ring seems a bit stiff and focussing literally turns the lens out of the adapter. I have cleaned and re-lubricated lenses before but I can't seem to find any major screws sitting on this one. Anyone has any idea?
Added are several photo's of this lens and a test snapshot. Sorry for the bad cropping, Lightroom didn't want to cooperate for once.
Test shot with one of my 2 pet rats as subject. The shot was taken wide open at f/2.8! Flashed with a Vivitar SB-4, bounced of ceiling. Shows some CA but I am still impressed with how sharp it is.
Last edited by JWH on Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Superb portrait! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
egidio
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 222 Location: slovenia
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
egidio wrote:
lots of ca but great bokeh, looks like a more BW lens _________________ I use: Flektogon 2.8/20, Flektogon 2.8/35, planar 50mm/1.4, Takumar 1.4/50mm, Takumar 1.9/85, MIR 24H, Mir1v, Industar-50-2, Helios-44-2, Pentacon 2.8/135, cyclop 85 1.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
Interesting lens and a characterful portrait (but with huge amounts of axial CA). _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:31 am Post subject: Re: A New Arrival, Jupiter 6-2 180/2,8 - with some questions |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
JWH wrote: |
Also the focus ring seems a bit stiff and focussing literally turns the lens out of the adapter. I have cleaned and re-lubricated lenses before but I can't seem to find any major screws sitting on this one. Anyone has any idea? |
It's in fact extremely simple. The lens unscrews into two parts easily; just hold the front of the lens with one hand, and the rear part with another, and unscrew. The entire optical assembly complete with diaphragm pre-set rings will come off, and you'll have full access to the focusing helicoid. From there, you'll remove the small screws from the knurled focusing ring, pull the ring upwards, and it'll be clear what to do after. Make sure not to lose any adjustment rings that may fall off the lens when you start disassembling it. Full instructions here: http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?id=8030 _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Hello JWH.
Wow, what a nice catch !
Having a look at the pictures and its serial number, I would guess :
1/ it was made for foreign trade as Jupiter is not written in cyrillic.
2/ It is a Jupiter-6-2 which is M42 mount
3/ the serial number beginning by 00, it seems to be a preseries made for VIPs as marc "themoleman" told us.
http://translate.google.fr/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.photohistory.ru%2Findex.php%3Fpid%3D1207248189136931&sl=ru&tl=en&hl=&ie=UTF-8
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.zenitcamera.com/archive/lenses/jupiter-6.html&rurl=translate.google.fr&usg=ALkJrhiVDwi-YqQQ_cRdxnPercjK52cTTw
Here a link to the MFLenses topic about russian serial numbers
Russian serial numbers _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
It's an odd hybrid to be sure. I wouldn't be too quick to call it a 6-2 though. It is possible to just swap out the nameplates. This doesn't really matter, I've just never seen a soviet silver version of any lens to have the -2 designation, and not be black. I don't mean to burst anyone's bubble, it could in fact be a very rare transition piece.
You're also absolutely sure it's a native m42 mount? I've encountered some m39 zenit lenses that have had m39-m42 rings on them for so long it looks almost natural.
The rat picture is superb! The lens shows a truly distinct character.
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JWH
Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JWH wrote:
Thanks for the replies everyone.
@Olivier - Thanks for the info's, wasn't aware that the serial numbers were for most Russian lenses! As I looked into those for the Helios I own.
@themoleman342 - It is hard to say if there's a ring on the mount or not. I've read some people saying that these rings are sometimes nearly impossible to get off. I've tried to see if something would move at the mount side for a while and put quite some strength into it, but nothing would move. Also when feeling at the area you don't feel any space between the mount part and the body itself. Also at the inner part, as the rear element is quite far up, you don't feel anything that might indicate a ring. You can feel the inner part of the mount go to the M42 mount pretty smoothly without spaces or sharpish ends. Which leaves me to believe that there is no ring attached, however I am not able to say this with full 100% certainty.
I've added a photo of the mount part which hopefully could help.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
There is certainly no adapter ring, but the mount may not be original. It probably was a professional job. Considering the typical expense of these lenses, it is not unlikely that someone would want this done. That would just be my guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JWH
Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JWH wrote:
Just a thought;
Could it be professionaly and exclusively made lens made in M42 mount / or silver for a certain customer? Seeing the serial number is 00xxxx and according to your guide to serials that means it was made for VIP's. If it really were to be adjusted for M42 the job is very professional. Even the part of the base of the lens is made to fit to M42, rather than M39, seeing the silver incline is definately part of the base.
Pardon me if I am going too far in my mind here, I just like to know everything about it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Maybe not, JWH.
I say that because I own a beautiful silver Helios-40 which has been modified to fit M42 and your above picture of your Jupiter-6 makes me think about that. When I received the Helios-40, I didn't see any additional ring or any adapter from M39 to M42.
Then, it is written Jupiter-6-2 on the front label ring, and those Jupiters were for M42 mount. So, it could be a preserial lens. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
More than likely it was a post-factory job. Customization and special orders weren't really a feature of soviet production lines. I've since come full-circle on the serial number post. I think most read a little too much into it. Maybe there was a heightened quality control for pre-production lenses, which may reduce the number of lemons, but this did not necessarily mean that the materials were better. While I do believe it still may be worth while to search for a lens beginning with 0, 00, or 000 you do have to understand that party membership was at 19 million people by 1986. Party membership was maintained and increased through incentives. One of the methods of social control was sustained scarcity. If the party could in fact say that optics (or any goods) were set aside for specific members, perhaps some would join for this reason. But yes, I could go on, but the history lesson is over for now. Back to the original question, I think you just have a really professionally replaced mount. Perhaps the original was damaged in some way and instead of just putting the old back the owner 'upgraded' it to m42. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
themoleman342 wrote: |
More than likely it was a post-factory job. Customization and special orders weren't really a feature of soviet production lines. |
There was an article in the "Soviet Photo" magazine detailing how to convert some M39 into M42 without losing infinity focusing. Apparently, the article was geared towards camera technicians (I can only guess there were no other ways to communicate information to them). So it could indeed be a professional upgrade done in a repair shop at the time. Or it can be an early prototype - I've seen quite many of those prototype lenses made in small numbers, so I won't call them extremely rare. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
It can be an early production version of the jupiter 6-2 (due to the numbers and the mount), or a very good mount change job.
It was a common thing for Soviet 'master' (people with good hands and technical skills) to change \ modify stuff to fit their needs.
Many people did that in improvised workshops in their studies \ garages.
And it can also be a case of an old lens getting to the hands of a professional who preferred to change the mount for a newer camera rather than use adapter rings.
Anyway, wonderful lens - enjoy it! _________________ Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|