View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 6:40 am Post subject: Some Hiking Shots |
|
|
David wrote:
Finally developed and scanned the last of my hiking shots from the other week. These were all Adox 100, taken with my Pentax KX, using a Quantaray (Tamron) 70-300, Sigma 35-80, or Samyang 18-28. Mostly, I used the Tamron.
1
2
3
4
These previous three were actually taken around my office, to finish off the roll after the hike.
5
6
_________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maxcastle
Joined: 14 Apr 2012 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
maxcastle wrote:
I particularly like number 6, almost expect neil young to appear! or laura ingalls! _________________ my humble blog is
http://rolotomassi.blog.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
I like 3, 4 and 5 most. Why don't you upload them a little larger? _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
Thank you, both, for your comments. I enjoy knowing what people like because it validates (or brings into question) my own taste. I admit my favorite is 4.
I upload them that size because I'm too cheap to buy high-speed Internet and instead tether off my cell phone carrier's data connection. Sure it's 3G and all, but it still takes 18 hours to upload a video to YouTube and about 5 minutes to upload 5 megs pf photos to Picasa. So I size them all at 1,000 pixels (maximum dimension) and compress them to 10. That makes grayscale jpegs about 200K and color jpegs about 500K. Anything larger and it would take forever to upload all my photos. Plus, I have like 10,000 photos on my Picasa account hand still haven't broken 4GB.
I once e-mailed 64 camera phone images to myself and it took five days for the e-mail to leave my phone's imbox. Oops. I think my carrier puts the brakes on high-data-volume users' connection speeds. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
The horizontal pics are large enough but the vertical would benefit a lot from the ~double size. _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|