Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Konica MG, Kodak Vision2 500T @1000, Fomadon LQR
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:07 pm    Post subject: Konica MG, Kodak Vision2 500T @1000, Fomadon LQR Reply with quote

I was interested in trying to push the 500T to the max ISO setting of this camera for low light shooting.

Seems the film is perfectly capable of very nice results pushed to 1000 but the MG metering isn't upto the job, some of the shots were underexposed while others were exposed perfectly, trying to fix the underexposed ones ran into grain issues. Also, the results aren't so sharp, the MG is nowhere hear as sharp as the Konica A4.

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12

#13

#14

#15

#16

#17

#18

#19

#20

#21


PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It may not be as sharp as some but it has a nice glow to it in the highlights of some of these shots. I really like the Laundry room one !


PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers Erkie. I'm going to get some copper tape so I can put my own dx markings on the reloadable canisters then I can try shooting this film in the A4, see if it is sharper, the A4 is razor sharp so if there is any softness, it will be the film, although I have had very sharp results from the film with my Konica Hexanons so i suspect it's just the MG.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

8-10 and 18 stand out for me. 18 especially. 8 has great tones and contrasts.

15 and 16 look off. Did you post-process them for sharpening? There's nothing wrong with that in my book, but those both look a little off like the sharpening may have been overly assertive for the images.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers David.

They are all sharpened, I think 15 and 16, bad light and not so accurate exposure played a part.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Damn nice tone curve you got there - that saw is positively grungy! And I mean that in the best possible way Laughing


PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers, the MG wasn't that accurate in exposure so I had to play with the results, which partly accounts for the funky tones.