View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:06 am Post subject: Olympus Trip AF50, Kodak Vision2 500T in Fomadon LQN |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
This is a very nice looking camera but it's bloody awful to use! Surprising Olympus put out something this bad. It is a 28mm fixed focus lens so the AF part is a lie - it even has the letters 'AF' in red on the front! Fixed aperture and single shutter speed so it's a toy camera really.
All this could be forgiven if the lens was any good. It isn't, very soft, low in contrast and loads of barrel distortion, just crap.
Worst of all, the camera doesn't space the frames correctly, the first frames are heavily overlapped and the spacing slowly gets greater so by the end of the roll, there is a cm between the last two frames. This means the middle of the roll and the end of the roll are okay, but the first third of the roll is useless as the frames are overlapped.
Worst camera I've ever used, by far.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
#15
#16
#17
#18
#19
#20
#21
#22
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
First forest pictures did save series.
I confirm this my camera was crap too, did work well but took crap images. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I like the forest pics, I only included the others to illustrate what a crappy camera this is.
The softness, distortion and lack of contrast are all bad.
One good thing about using this camera - it makes me appreciate the good ones much more, now I've seen what a bad one is like _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1826 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
It is a travesty that Olympus called the AF50 a Trip! The original Trip, with the light meter wrapped around the lens was great. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Aye, that original Trip was great, but they used the name for a lot of cheap plastic cameras and spoilt it, sadly. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|