View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kyonthinh
Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 7:44 pm Post subject: Pentacon 30 3.5 - one day in Leipzig with B/W |
|
|
kyonthinh wrote:
Well, as I said, I didnt like it. But because it gives 45mm in Crop camera, it's worth a try.
All wide open, and i'm new in B/W, so pictures are not very good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Looks as though flare may be an issue?
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
This is a lot better lens what you did present here _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ducdao
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 288 Location: Montreal, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
ducdao wrote:
The results are terrible. I have this lens and it's not that bad. Maybe you should try stopping it down, this lens is not meant to be shot wide open. _________________ Duc
Pentax K100D/K10D/K20D/K-x/K-7 | DA15/ 35/40/70 Limited | DA10-17 | DA14 | DA* 50-135
Takumar: 24/3.5 | 28/3.5 | 35/2 | 35/2.3 | 35/3.5 | 50/1.4 | 55/1.8 | 85/1.8 | 85/1.9 | 105f2.8 | 135/2.5 | 135/3.5 | 150/4 | 200/4 | 300/4
Pentax: K20/4 | M20/4 | M28/3.5 | K30/2.8 | K35/3.5 | M50/1.4 | M50/1.7 | K50/1.2 | K50/1.4 | K55/1.8 | A50/1.4 | M85/2 | M100/2.8 | K105/2.8 | M100/f4 | M135/3.5 | K135/2.5 | M150/4 | M200/4 | M300/4
M42: Too many to list
Stock Images
My Flickr: Sunny Skye |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kyonthinh
Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
kyonthinh wrote:
I think I have a bad copy, in color it's always too soft. Maybe I should throw it out when I have time and money and buy me another. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
kyonthinh wrote: |
I think I have a bad copy, in color it's always too soft. Maybe I should throw it out when I have time and money and buy me another. |
I have issues with my 30/3.5. I'm probably going to send to Moleman to at least get it cleaned up. I agree with the poster
about shooting wide open at 3.5. Not very good results when wide open. _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Ok, so technically it's not great, but IMHO some pictures have distinct vintage charm. I quite like the stairs, the cameras and the last one. I find the softness and the glow quite pleasant. IMHO it creates the illusion of a very old movie. Should be interesting for female portraits too. I wouldn't try to squeeze any sharpness from it, just use as a softfocus lens. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2697 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
fermy wrote: |
Ok, so technically it's not great, but IMHO some pictures have distinct vintage charm. I quite like the stairs, the cameras and the last one. I find the softness and the glow quite pleasant. IMHO it creates the illusion of a very old movie. Should be interesting for female portraits too. I wouldn't try to squeeze any sharpness from it, just use as a softfocus lens. |
I agree that some of these shots, especially the last, have some lovely old world charm to them. I've only used my version wide open on close-ups so I expect it's the same on larger scenes, it's still an excellent lens though. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
erm might be worth checking if someone had put one of the elements in the wrong way......it happened to me from an ebay lens. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I have the Meyer zebra version and find it to be a wonderful lens. Tack sharp with great colors. However, mine had bad haze when I received it, which I cleaned - now still has haze, but not as bad. This is the lens I now pick up when I need something in that general focal length, even though it is relatively slow. I actually like it better than my Flek 35/2.4. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I've had three copies of this lens and one did have a similar look to this one, due to being full of fungus, a complete coating of two elements with the thin, wispy kind. After I cleaned it the IQ improved dramatically and it performed like the others.
The way this one is performing right now, it's definitely got something wrong with it. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kyonthinh
Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kyonthinh wrote:
Can you show me how to open inner element? After I remove 3 parts, I dont see any screw which i must remove more. Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I wish I could remember, it's been 9 months or more since I did it, sorry. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kyonthinh
Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kyonthinh wrote:
Ok, I found out, I must remove from the front, not the rear.
Test with your post, ian.
Still the same i think. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Yes, from the front, sorry I'm late to tell you that. I found the front easier to clean that the tiny rear element, and I suspect I still have haze remaining in my rear glass. To my knowlede the front elements are bonded into a single piece and cannot be installed wrong. The rear I don't remember if it could be reversed. I suggest you put the glass up to a very bright light and see if there is fogging. There sure appears to be a lot of diffusion in your pictures. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Good luck Kyonith, I've had a few lenses that were like yours and ruined by fungus and haze, most of them I was able to clean, luckily, and I'm far from an expert. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kyonthinh
Joined: 30 Mar 2012 Posts: 222 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kyonthinh wrote:
The rear is damaged, very sad . Maybe i will sell it or keep as soft lens. Good news is the shop near my house still have two meyer lydith, bad news is i dont have any money until next month.
Life is hard, isnt it? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Riku
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 1059 Location: Finland
Expire: 2017-04-30
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Riku wrote:
My Meyer 30/3.5 is good if you don't examine extreme corners or distortions...
Last edited by Riku on Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I agree about the corners, but they behave better when stopped down.
Before cleaned
No crop - after cleaning
Up close
Fully open, note upper left somewhat blurry
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I read this topic the other night and thought, "I like my Pentacon, I'm sure it's better than this ?" But I hadn't used it for a while, so I got it out today and tried it.
Cropped, but otherwise completely untouched, when zoomed in that's sharp ! and although it was a grey day I've seen CA in shots like this from lesser lenses, there's none here.
Straight out of the camera.
Straight out of the camera.
Big crop and auto levels to get some better exposure on the cat.
Sadly, I think Kyonthinh's Pentacon has a problem. normally it's a very good budget lens that is often overlooked because it is seen as 'cheap'. That's a shame, it's very good. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Macca
Joined: 20 Mar 2012 Posts: 248 Location: Glasgow, Scotland.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Macca wrote:
Its a nice lens ,I like the mfd, this is with a close up filter 3+ at 5.6
and wide open can have a nice effect too
_________________ Sony A7iii.
CZ Distagon 15mm 2.8,Loxia 25mm 2.4,RE Auto Topcor 35mm 2.8,Contax Zeiss 35mm1.4,Minolta M Rokkor 40mm f2, Jupiter 3 50mm 1.5, Kuribayashi CC Petri Orikkor 50mm 2,Topcor S 50mm f2,Topcor RE GN 50mm 1.8,RE Auto Topcor 58mm 1.4, Helios 44m 2,Steinheil Munchen Auto Quinon 55m 1.9,Olympus auto g zuiko 60mm f1.5 ,KMZ PO2-2M 75mm F2,Jupiter 9 85mm f2(Arsenal Kiev),RE Auto Topcor 85mm 1.8,Leica Elmarit 90mm 2.8 R, RE Auto Topcor 100mm 2.8,Meyer Orestor 100mm 2.8,,F.B.R.105mm 2.4, RE Auto Topcor 135mm 3.5,Leica Elmarit R 135mm 2.8,Steinheil Munchen Quinar VL 135mm 2.8,Contax Zeiss 100-300mm 4.5-5.6, Vernon Edonar 350mm 5.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|