View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:13 am Post subject: Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.4 |
|
|
fermy wrote:
I've been a good boy and haven't bought a lens for the whole 2 weeks. However, all things come to an end. Today the mailman brought the package with another Hexanon. There was a discussion recently, which Hexanon 50 is the best, soon I will know...
Meanwhile here's the loot that this lens brought me within one hour family walk. The coatings are very good -- check out the river picture, the sun is just outside the frame. I haven't compared it directly to my "best" 50s - Canon FD 50/1.4 and 1.2 and Minolta MD 50/1.4, but the lens is a cracker for sure. All shots are with E-PL1.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Pictures look very good indeed!
Nice lens, congrats. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Beautiful work! I had the Hex 1.7/50 and this one, and this is the one I kept. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arctures
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 295
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
Ecxellent resuts very nice lens character! _________________ Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2., Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heartcat
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2012 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heartcat wrote:
Such pretty spring flowers.
The last photo is the best one for me. Beautiful lighting, great sharpness and detail, and nice composition. _________________ Canon 50D; CZJ Sonnar 135mm 3.5; SMC Takumar 55mm 1.8; Helios 44-2 58mm 2; Jupiter 37-A 135mm 3.5; Jupiter 11A 135mm 4; Pentacon 135mm 2.8; Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5;(Tokina) Vivitar 35mm 2.8; Tokina RMC 28mm 2.8; Vivitar 19mm 3.8; RMC Tokina 80-200mm 4.5; RMC Tokina 35-70mm 3.5; Panagor 90mm 2.8; Asahi Pentax extension tubes; 2xAuto Prinz teleconverter M42 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tenoates
Joined: 20 Apr 2012 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 5:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
tenoates wrote:
Nice! Is this Leica M-mount?
TIA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Arctures wrote: |
Ecxellent resuts very nice lens character! |
+1 _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Some of your shots are showing "pop" on my monitor...these are the lenses I prefer to help me achieve this. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
tenoates wrote: |
Nice! Is this Leica M-mount?
TIA |
Nope, this is regular Konica AR mount. Either I am extremely lucky with 50/1.4 lenses, or they are indeed the sweet spot of the 50's. Check out here my Canon FD 50/1.4 samples. http://forum.mflenses.com/hexanon-50mm-f1-4-or-f1-7-t48185,start,15.html#1217211 Same pop. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghost2501
Joined: 26 Apr 2012 Posts: 102 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ghost2501 wrote:
Is 40 € a fair price for this lense (I think it is).
I hesitate to buy one of the following 50mm f1.4 lenses :
- this Hexanon (Konica mount)
- or the Pentax Takumar SMC (bids will end in 7 days but price is 30 € for now)
- or the Fujinon (M42 mount - +/- 150 € ) _________________ Nikon D7000 + Sony NEX-3 + Vivitar 24mm f2, Rexagon 28mm f2.8, Pentor 35mm f2.8, Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.4 + Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AI, Helios 44M 58mm f2, Jupiter-9 85mm f2, Helios 100mm f2 from T3C-2, Kaleinar 100mm f2.8, Makinon 135mm f2.8, Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Let me put it that way: I've got it cheaper, but I had to repair it. I would never sell it for 40 Euros. The lens is much better than that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
40 euros is a great price for this lens, it usually fetches more than that, it's a great lens, I wouldn't hesitate to take it for 40eu. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Quote: |
which Hexanon 50 is the best |
hehe all the best , congrats!! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Quote: |
which Hexanon 50 is the best |
hehe all the best , congrats!! |
Thanks! Yeah, so true, "best" is not defined.
Anyway, out of curiosity I did a shootout between this Hexanon 50/1.4, Hexanon 50/1.7 and Canon FDn 50/1.2. You know, paper clippings, boring stuff, but shows sharpness and contrast well. The results surprised me.
Canon won, it's significantly sharper in the corners at large apertures. However, this was expected, Canon FD 50/1.4 and 1.2 are really hard to beat for resolution and contrast across the frame. What baffles me is that this lens came last, beaten by 50/1.7 Hexanon as well. However, I can't get 50/1.4 Hexanon off my camera, it just makes any dull northern day look like spring: nice punchy, yet natural rendering, the images that pop. Hexanon 50/1.7 never felt anything like that to me, good sharp lens, but it never felt special. I guess this just shows how limited is the value of lens tests.
More pics with 50/1.4 Hexanon.
Last edited by fermy on Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:34 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I shoot mine often on my FT1 and I think it might be a slightly better performer on film.
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
...well I can add my small test for resolution at 100 yards....there wasn't much difference between Canon FDn 50mm f1.4 and Hexanon 50mm f1.7. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
1) I shot at 3m
2) The differences were only at large apertures, by f4 they were pretty much gone
3) The difference in the corners were quite obvious at 100% view.
I am not sure if any of this matters photographically. I suppose I can come up with scenario where corners at f1.4-f2 would matter, but in practice it's not very often. The bottom line here is that in actual usage the lens that loses on test charts feels superior to me (not compared to FD, but compared to f1.7 Hexanon). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
fermy wrote: |
1) I shot at 3m
2) The differences were only at large apertures, by f4 they were pretty much gone
3) The difference in the corners were quite obvious at 100% view.
I am not sure if any of this matters photographically. I suppose I can come up with scenario where corners at f1.4-f2 would matter, but in practice it's not very often. The bottom line here is that in actual usage the lens that loses on test charts feels superior to me (not compared to FD, but compared to f1.7 Hexanon). |
Well I find comparing lenses interesting, but I remember in the 1960s the same discussions and I'm sure it will continue into the future. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghost2501
Joined: 26 Apr 2012 Posts: 102 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ghost2501 wrote:
I've just received my copy today. Lens is in very good shape but... there are some fungus. That's the only flaw I can see for now.
If that's not visible @f8, I think I can live with it.
Beside that, great bargain for 40 €. _________________ Nikon D7000 + Sony NEX-3 + Vivitar 24mm f2, Rexagon 28mm f2.8, Pentor 35mm f2.8, Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.4 + Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AI, Helios 44M 58mm f2, Jupiter-9 85mm f2, Helios 100mm f2 from T3C-2, Kaleinar 100mm f2.8, Makinon 135mm f2.8, Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
Well I too got one saturday and waiting for the film to be used up. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghost2501
Joined: 26 Apr 2012 Posts: 102 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ghost2501 wrote:
My copy is rather soft @f1.4 but gets better @f2.0
f1.4
f2.0
f2.8
f4.0
I'll compare it to my Nikkor 50mm 1.8 Ai some day. _________________ Nikon D7000 + Sony NEX-3 + Vivitar 24mm f2, Rexagon 28mm f2.8, Pentor 35mm f2.8, Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.4 + Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AI, Helios 44M 58mm f2, Jupiter-9 85mm f2, Helios 100mm f2 from T3C-2, Kaleinar 100mm f2.8, Makinon 135mm f2.8, Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lena
Joined: 24 Apr 2012 Posts: 495 Location: Pl
|
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lena wrote:
Ghost2501 wrote: |
I'll compare it to my Nikkor 50mm 1.8 Ai some day. |
That would be very useful |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ghost2501
Joined: 26 Apr 2012 Posts: 102 Location: Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ghost2501 wrote:
Can fungus be responsible for softness wide open ?
I hesitate to dismount it for cleaning (7 elements in 6 groups). _________________ Nikon D7000 + Sony NEX-3 + Vivitar 24mm f2, Rexagon 28mm f2.8, Pentor 35mm f2.8, Konica Hexanon 50mm f1.4 + Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AI, Helios 44M 58mm f2, Jupiter-9 85mm f2, Helios 100mm f2 from T3C-2, Kaleinar 100mm f2.8, Makinon 135mm f2.8, Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f3.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Yes. 50/1.4 is not difficult to dismantle from the rear. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|