Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Pacific Optical 450mm f/3.0
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 8:05 pm    Post subject: Pacific Optical 450mm f/3.0 Reply with quote

--

Last edited by Opticus on Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:27 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whow, looks nice Smile
Is that camera body for this lens, or only a size indication?
I suppose it has clear (not colored) visible transmission, so I would say it is for the visible spectra.
Iris, but no focusing mechanism.
US manufacturer.
-> Military, probably aerial for the aircrafts at higher heights (like U2)?


PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked Shocked


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Covers 6x6. AWAR on Pan X 65 lp/mm. Very effective coating, 98% transmission. Probably poorly achromatized, "color correction 5461 A - 6563 A"

USAF bought 'em, so for some aerial application or other.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pardon my ignorance, but what does AWAR stand for?

I notice the lens was made in Inglewood, CA, isn't that also where Lockheed had a factory?


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Area Weighted Average Resolution

http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXI/congress/part1/176_XXXI-part1.pdf

http://books.google.com/books?id=9bVlw51dyrEC&pg=PA43&lpg=PA43&dq=Area+Weighted+Average+Resolution&source=bl&ots=sV69YIpbXD&sig=nqVMTtxwZy1f_LBp8fAME3PxfNE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=xaQiUJPdJ4Oi2AWK5YGwAQ&ved=0CEgQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=Area%20Weighted%20Average%20Resolution&f=false


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think Ian has visions of that lens on the front of his NEX. Wink


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the info, Dan! Did you find the rest of USAF datasheets?
Edit: Nevermind. It's in the datasheets you sent me

Lloydy wrote:
I think Ian has visions of that lens on the front of his NEX. Wink


I'll post up some samples once i get this monster in my hands. Very Happy


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, after this 3kilo beast caused me some back pain the other day I've kind of lost interest in superheavy lenses:



However, I do have a tripod sufficiently strong to hold that 30kilo Pacific monster Wink


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

--

Last edited by Opticus on Sun Aug 21, 2016 7:27 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rathenower Optische Werke Visionar 1.9/168.


PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Well, after this 3kilo beast caused me some back pain the other day I've kind of lost interest in superheavy lenses

However, I do have a tripod sufficiently strong to hold that 30kilo Pacific monster Wink


Ian, I'm surprised at you. Yours is a tiny little lens of nothing at all.

I'm pleased, though, that you understand one of the reasons I'm not strongly in favor of most longer lenses from aerial cameras.

Thinking of which, for those who want such things, there's a 100/5.6 S.F.O.M. (covers 4x5) on offer on leboncoin.fr. Topogon/Metrogon clone, I think. I have one, don't recommend getting the one on the 'coin, but advice from me has rarely stopped people from making foolish mistakes. The lens itself is in a light alloy barrel but the cone is very heavy; my initial reaction to mine was that the Armee de l'Air must have flown battlecruisers.